We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Panmure Gordon | PMR | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
99.00 | 99.00 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 11/1/2018 18:50 by freddie ferret Long time since I posted here.Lot of water under the bridge. PMR still exists, how independent it is is questionable imho. Putin has designs on the whole of Ukraine I think. |
Posted at 06/1/2017 15:08 by fizzypop The Financial Trader @Devon_Trader 38m38 minutes agoPMR has risen by 20% today, up a lot during last month, wonder if a takeover could occur here, it's been mentioned, luckily I'm in from 46p. 0 replies . 0 retweets 1 like |
Posted at 08/8/2016 08:26 by spob PMR bid story in the Sunday RNS yesterday, apparently |
Posted at 18/5/2016 21:29 by spob There is no dividendThe last dividend was paid in May 2015 |
Posted at 03/5/2016 09:36 by fizzypop Are we due another divi shortly, it went ex-divi 4 May last year? |
Posted at 08/3/2016 11:57 by cliffpeat Thanks for the link isis - it will be interesting to follow Johnson's progress.The tone of the article indicates a much more pro-active attitude than that suggested by the annual report of PMR (in my opinion) And if he can introduce and support strong businesses onto AIM it could do much to restore the reputation and usefulness of that market. |
Posted at 25/2/2016 13:08 by isis It looked pretty rosey when the Dividend was paid. But I know the business well and this turmoil has hit the IPO business, especially AIM.Let's hope they can recover. Even the Lloyds Float has been postponed so not all PMR's fault, but they should have a better income strategy. Looks like a Board Coup - but it had to crack somewhere. |
Posted at 25/2/2016 11:21 by salpara111 What a sorry tale! So glad I took my loss at 100pIt was pretty clear that wale was not up to the job. I hold cenkos now. Similar business but trades on a pe of about 4 and yields 11 percent. They just confirmed trading is in line with expectations so there is no reason why pmr should be doing so badly. |
Posted at 13/2/2016 15:20 by cliffpeat Board has no female executive director. Just saying. It all looks solid but grey IMO.2014 turn round year annual report stresses the high standards and quality service but could see no evidence of "rain makers" or innovation (except saying something to the effect that they keep an eye on new models etc. in the market). There appears to be some evidence that high growth SMEs is the sector that is making a significant impact on UK economy. What services and value, now or in the future, is PMR providing this sector? Are they (we) identifying and supporting the coming tsunami of IPOs, trade sales and mergers that are likely to happen over the next 5 years? Can - or should they report on their efforts and role in the incubation of the next generation of corporate players (businesses, not suits). Are there any contributors to this discussion board who are able to spell out the Value Propositions of PMR and how these are being adapted to current business environments and anticipating the future? |
Posted at 30/11/2015 22:07 by adamb1978 Just had another look through the numbers for PMR as have had much finger inching ever closer to the sell button in recent weeks. I've decided to continue to hold for a combination of reasons:- net working capital is 113p per share, so its trading at a heavy discount to w/cap - H1 was awful however if you look back at the group over recent years, turnover went £18m, £21m, £27m and then £29m in 2014. Clients similarly grew from 76 in 2011 to 142 at the latest half year - the CS acquisition will add about 10p to EPS on its own, and financed from a cash balance which was earning as good as nothing - there should be a reasonable amount of cost synergies which can be extracted from the deal with CS - whilst I wouldn't hold a company purely because on the hope of corporate action, PMR's ownership structure is not a long-term solution I'm therefore planning to hold at least the 2015 results, probably the 2016 interims. Adam |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions