We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Netscientific Plc | LSE:NSCI | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BN4R5Q82 | ORD 5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 63.00 | 61.00 | 65.00 | 63.00 | 63.00 | 63.00 | 6,290 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 1M | -3.09M | -0.1312 | -4.80 | 14.85M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/2/2017 23:13 | Since October Che7win has been talking about a placing being imminent - well, still no sign of it. | yasx | |
10/2/2017 23:13 | Chewin, What deficiencies have you highlighted - I am yet to read any. You initially appeared here talking about a 'chart curve' that induced you to take a position. What kind of straregy is that? -------------------- "che7win5 Oct '16 - 15:54 - 481 of 569 0 0 The chart curve still intact. If this moves, it will move very quick, I guess it needs news flow. -------------------- You then took a loss and thereafter deliberately try to skew your assessment of Proaxis until I pointed out that Proaxis alone was projected to generate nearly £300 million profit in less than a decade. So, what deficiencies have you come up with? Any? No, thought not. Now Chewin, if you have something useful to say, then do so (I very much doubt it)- otherwise close the door on your way out. | yasx | |
10/2/2017 20:07 | Yaz, Both your posts are fictitious. Basket cases should be avoided, I've learned not to invest in basket cases.Speaking of which, this stock has been nothing but a mitigated disaster for investors so far, How on earth did you get sucked in here?I'm quite amused that you continue to peddle this, perhaps you have no option and hope for some buyers to pump it up as before so yeah can escape?Stop trying to divert attention away from this company and its prospects. I'm glad to have ignored you and highlighted the deficiencies - it might have saved a few others following you. | che7win | |
10/2/2017 18:57 | You could not make it up - Chewin is overly concerned about the possibility of dilution at NSCI, a stock to which he has nil exposure. However, he is not concerned about the gargantuan scale of dilution observed at Tethys for a pittance, a stock in which he invested all his savings and (from memory), apparently took out a loan to add at 18p to his losing initial position taken at 55p. Oh dear! | yasx | |
10/2/2017 18:55 | I will produce the report this weekend - fear not chaps, expect a robust piece. Chewin - yo have failed to explain why you refuse to accept the disproportionate dilution at Tethys as nothing short of horrendous, yet remind us regularly on here about the possibility of dilution even though we have yet so witness any for a year or more. Come on, let us have your Tethys report (the one you prepared when backing Tethys at 55p and the addendum you offered to produce when Botting took over at 18p). Chuckle chuckle - in goes the boot. Thud! | yasx | |
10/2/2017 09:04 | runway, think the sagacious chap writes one word per day. | che7win | |
10/2/2017 08:12 | can we expect the 'detailed report' anytime soon.....?...... | runwaypaul | |
08/2/2017 23:19 | As for NSCI, I have a meeting with the Company within the next week. Some members of the Board are on holiday, others travelling. But, fairly soon I will catch up and give them a dressing down. This gracious chap is not one to soak up baseless ebullience from any Director. | yasx | |
08/2/2017 23:17 | Chewin, Opportunity cost is not an issue since I have a very diversified portfolio, and NSCI represent a tiny fraction of the same. I, like most sagacious investors, have a substantial part of the portfolio in cash to enable this gracious chap to grasp opportunities presented - thus, the opportunity cost to which you refer is in reality a virtual one. In your case however, it is real - you, by your own admission, went banco and bet the farm on Tethys. You continued to average down all the way from 50p, and especially when Botting took a seat on the Board, notwithstanding this gracious chaps seminars that Botting was a dud with not the faintest idea about anything. You are concerned about funding at NSCI, what about Tethys, which has just diluted holders of equity into oblivion for around a million pounds, having spent no less than around 400 million trying to prove up reserves. You could not make it up. Off you go. | yasx | |
08/2/2017 16:42 | Oh dear, another new low here and yazX yet to produce his 10 page research.Unloved and fund raising or equity reduction beckons.Just think of the opportunity cost here YazX, must be costing u a fortune to hold a dog going down when the market is on a rising tide? | che7win | |
02/2/2017 20:51 | Chewin, I think your 'no brainer' Tethys is the one that requires funding. Any sign of it, or, like the former Head Honcho Robson, is it over for good. Oh dear! | yasx | |
02/2/2017 15:40 | averaging down losers.... cardinal sin. | runwaypaul | |
02/2/2017 00:51 | Escape, Not bought any over the past few days -I hold plenty, but if it declines further I will take more.It really is tempting. I hope to have some feedback over the coming days. Incidentally, volume on the recent drop is very slight. | yasx | |
01/2/2017 14:00 | Yasx - are you buying ? | escapetohome | |
01/2/2017 09:49 | New low, when is the fund raising? | che7win | |
30/1/2017 09:26 | 380k options granted to Directors at 65.5p - poor that. | mortimer7 | |
10/1/2017 19:38 | If any disenchanted seller wishes to offload, then send me a message. | yasx | |
10/1/2017 19:36 | I earlier tried to get hold of a few more shares but there was hardly anything available - if one wises to acquire a line, well, one has to pay over the odds. Very confident of a good year ahead.... | yasx | |
19/12/2016 23:10 | Chewin, I am still expecting a deal to materialise - I had hoped this side of the new year, but, a little more patience required. | yasx | |
16/12/2016 22:47 | The deal this morning with PDS is taking more money out of NSCI.I thought the sagacious chap had stated that the flow of money would be the reverse of this.Oh dear. | che7win | |
07/12/2016 07:39 | not long left.... WOT?NO DEAL? | runwaypaul | |
17/11/2016 19:54 | Chewin, They don't need to raise cash by issuing equity in NSCI - it is perfectly more reasonable for each of the portfolio companies within the Group to undertake a financing arrangement by way of, say, a stake in (Vortex or another of the companies within the Group) in return for funds. In that way the NSCI stake in a part of the Group is reduced but this is not only necessary to develop the different parts but is well documented as the intended pathway in all the press announcements if you actually were sufficiently concerned to read them. I still expect the first of these financing arrangements to conclude by the end of the year. | yasx | |
17/11/2016 12:41 | They need to raise cash. | che7win |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions