||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
Management Res Share Discussion Threads
Showing 4276 to 4296 of 4300 messages
|Let's get this chairman out.Get the two proposed ned's appointed.Then likely we will want to replace the broker/nomad. Then it's full steam ahead with an excellent and focused business.|
|I'm paraphrasing, he said results would be out but he didn't specifically say that we would resume trading although they should go hand in hand.|
|Yes we really need everyone who voted, to vote AGAIN at the next egm to remove Murray.Don't rely on everyone else, take the few minutes needed to place your own vote.This worm will now know the percentage against him.I wonder if he will get it trading and then be able to issue the final 500k worth of shares to bachmann.He will do whatever he can to cling to control, we must stop him by being United and voting without fail.|
|They said this morning that accounts out next week which will enable trading to resume.|
|Yes Jonnyfro - if 63% could be bothered to vote "for" they are likely to have voted for the resolution that was removed mid-process. So you'd expect most of these people will go to the trouble of voting the same again. It will be fascinating if Murray reflects and decides he can't win or he goes down when the vote happens. Feels this is going to move forwards soon but I am sure they will through a few more curved balls along the way|
|The resolution didn't pass because 75% was required. The next meeting is a straightforward 50.01 requirement. I suspect he may resign rather than be pushed.|
|63% in favour reported from the general meeting. A great turnout well done all who voted!|
"if someone wishes to take mine at the suspension price then that can be arranged in short order"
another failed punt from the waffling 'guru'.|
|Post on LSE board from Paul Morffew ! (text below reposted here with his permission)
"Sorry for not replying sooner as I was at the creditors meeting of MRS Pty Ltd (Mr Berkefeld was the representative of all the company's including MRS PLC).
Squareones happy for you to phone or email me (climate here is 32C). Here is my email address paul @ Scopn .com. au email me and I will give you my phone number. I only responded because someone said I was on twitter and I am (finally got up the nerve to post). I do have 2 twitters accounts thanks for whoever pointed that out. The other one was set up in 2010 and I can't remember the password. Not a big keyboard warrior as you so eloquently put it although I am liking twitter. But I have read with interest every post since October plus some of the not so subtle posters and Gige I apologise you are in this position and you do believe I am the root of all your evil but I categorically deny the accusations thrown at me. I agree there was an irreconcilable conflict between myself and the BOD. Maybe you and others should read the document which got into the hands of TW somehow in response to the circular (I definitely did not give it to him).
If anything ask yourselves one question. Why would I stuff up everything whilst I am personal guarantor for all the loans of the company and still are (still on the hook with Westpac for ~$11.6M) Read the admission document??? Even after I was supposedly terminated I am still Personal Guarantor for loans of MRS Pty Ltd. The BOD did not replace me. Not a nice situation to be in and totally outside my control.
It will be interesting to see what DK will post today about me. No doubt more defamatory claims.
I do not want to take the company back over and will support all shareholders in getting change when needed. That boat has well sailed.
The two NEDs proposed were unrelated to me and having only met Nigel and Trevor briefly in November (yes I was at the AGM). The NEDs were only put forward by my wife (not Daniela Athan) because of the difficulties in putting the requisition in by someone else who would have been a combination of shareholders to get the 5% required. It takes about 2 weeks to go through with our broker. These guys are totally independent, fantastic candidates, would run rings around current BOD and were put forward by other shareholders not myself as I was only the conduit.
People keep asking why don't I respond to the RNS' but just because its not out in the open do not believe for one minute it is not going on in the background. I have spent an inordinate amount of money on lawyers to date.
My wife did vote yes to all resolutions although they haven't shown up at the registrar yet.
Again Squareones, sorry if you don't believe who I am but feel free to email me as I am happy to chat. The same goes for Northland, Peterhouse and the BOD. Despite what is suggested by the BOD I do want an outcome. I have pressing family matters that take priority."|
|Loved your post on lse greenhills - if you're lucky hot soup;)|
|I'll tell you this - they can move when it suits them. Lawyers must have been advised to trawl everything and find a way to swing things in the BOD's favour. They weren't allowed to issue new shares to dilute as per last vito. As soon as they realised they could pay up Bachmann using the cover of closing old Mrs business and do it in shares (as this was before agreement to no more shares ) they jumped at the chance to do this IMMEDIATELY i.e before the vote so that they have the majority say on res 3/4.They are in no hurry for anything that doesn't suit them and hide behind clauses and lawyers to keep them just within the law. NOT acting in the shareholders best interest (as they are not holders) corruption and the slimy , slithering end of business creatures at play here - will be held accountable as this fraud-show is a transparent as can be - 'Donut' think you will get away with this - the world is watching you.|
|Agreed this moron needs to be out.|
|Clearly done before the egm to increase his voting hand, as he only needs 25% to overturn res 3/4.This payment in shares could've been made at any point in the last 2 months.Or I reckon cash balances are good enough to of paid in cash.It's funny we bought bachmann, but now THEY own 17% of Mrs and are still due 500k.D'almedia has NOT acted in the interests of shareholders here.Note, morffew made the previous payment of 500k in CASH, to preserve shareholder interest.Who would you back...a guy who owns 20% and is looking after your interests, or a guy who owns negligible shares himself, but issues shares like confetti to dilute holders, but which gives him a non-owned stake of 17% through control of bachmann stake.|
|Done to try and 'swing the vote ' by the looks of things - sad- must think we're daft|
|Wonder if it's legal to vary the number of shares mid vote - what with the other RNS they seem to be changing/making it up as they go along. Hopefully the old CEO is taking advice on how to best manage this|
|At first I thought - oh that sounds reasonable . Then quickly 5 words sprung to mind "TRYING TO SWING THE VOTE !"|
|Never seen a co doing a placing while suspended before.|
|RNS just out
|RNS just out
|probably never going to come back. that way the spiteful bod can stick it to the ex ceo by making his shares worthless. the pi's are just caught in the crossfire|