We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elcom Itl | LSE:ELC | London | Ordinary Share | COM SHS USD0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.00 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
RNS Number:5448K Elcom International Inc 21 December 2007 Elcom International, Inc. ("Elcom" or "the Company") 2006 ANNUAL RESULTS NORWOOD, MA, December 21, 2007 - Elcom International, Inc. (Pink Sheets: ELCO and AIM: ELC and ELCS), today announces operating results for its year ended December 31, 2006. Financial Summary Table (in thousands, except per share amounts) Year Ended December 31 2006 2005 $ $ Net sales 3,218 2,714 Gross profit 2,546 1,996 Operating loss (6,841) (4,242) ----- ----- Net loss (6,832) (5,840) ===== ===== Basic and diluted net loss per share (0.01) (0.08) Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 416,209 72,173 ======= ====== The above table, the following description and the condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Risk Factors and other information contained in the Company's 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Trading in the Company's shares on AIM remains suspended pending the announcement of its interim results to 30 June 2007 which the Company expects to be able to release in January 2008. Overview Elcom International, Inc. ("Elcom"), a corporation formed in Delaware in December 1992, is a leading provider of Internet-based remotely-hosted, integrated eProcurement and eMarketplace solutions and services ("ePurchasing") In the U.K., we have a substantial contract with Capgemini UK Plc ("Capgemini") associated with the Scottish Executive's eProcurement Scotl@nd Programme, where Elcom provides an ePurchasing system to agencies, councils, and National Health Service of Scotland (hospitals) Trusts ("Public Entities") in Scotland. We signed agreements with five Public Entities in 2005 and one in 2006, bringing the total number of Public Entities in the eProcurement Scotland program to 26. There are approximately 47 Public Entities potentially available to join the eProcurement Scotland program, and possibly more, depending upon the Scottish Executive's definition of eligibility. We earn implementation fees and monthly hosting services fees for each Public Entity that joins the eProcurement Scotland program. Capgemini is the prime contractor in the Scottish Executive Agreement. Elcom subcontracts under this agreement as the technology service provider. During 2006 this contract accounted for over 61% of our revenues and we continue to remain dependent on it. In addition, we are a member of a consortium led by PA Consulting Group UK Plc ("PA"), a world-wide consulting firm, which has been awarded a contract, and has executed agreements, including a Framework Agreement between Proc-Serve Shared Services Ltd. ("PSSL"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PA, and a U.K. government agency, for the creation and deployment of an eMarketplace for U.K. Public Entities (the "Zanzibar eMarketplace"). The Zanzibar eMarketplace agreements were signed on August 12, 2005 and have a primary term of five years. PSSL is the primary contractor and Elcom, as a subcontractor to PSSL, will provide the eProcurement and eMarketplace components of the Zanzibar eMarketplace system. Generally, the costs of administrating the Zanzibar eMarketplace contract will be shared by the consortium members, based upon each member's share of revenues. Accordingly, we will only realize a portion of its earned revenues, after costs of the PSSL entity are accounted for. The Zanzibar eMarketplace agreements provide for one-time installation fees and recurring monthly hosting services fees, as well as payments for certain development work. The agreements do not provide PSSL with unfettered rights to the underlying Elcom technology, and therefore we anticipate that it's realized development fees will be ratably recognized over the applicable term of the agreement. As of December 2006, four U.K. Public Entities have officially "gone live". We are currently in a contractual dispute with PA Consulting in respect of the Zanzibar contract, and also considering initiating an Intellectual Property claim against the same firm. Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 Net Revenues. Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased to $3,218,000 from $2,714,000 in 2005, an increase of $504,000, or 19%. License, hosting services and other fees for 2006 increased to $2,710,000 from $2,081,000 in 2005, an increase of $629,000 or 30%. This increase is primarily due to higher hosting services revenue related to the Scottish Executive's eProcurement Scotl@nd Programme related fees. License, hosting services and other fees include license fees, hosting services fees, test system fees, supplier fees, usage fees and eMarketplace agent and affiliate fees. Professional services fees for 2006 decreased to $508,000, from $633,000 in 2005. Deferred revenue includes $90,000 related to Zanzibar eMarketplace, the bulk of which relates to implementation services that are ongoing as of December 31, 2006. We began accreting professional services revenue to the Zanzibar eMarketplace in May 2007. Revenues from Capgemini associated with the Scottish Executive Department of the Government of Scotland (the "Scottish Executive"), comprised 61% and 53% of net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Gross Profit. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased to $2,546,000 from $1,996,000 in 2005, an increase of $550,000, or 28%. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in license, hosting services and other fees recognized in 2006 over that in 2005. In addition, we recorded a lower level of cost of revenues in 2006, primarily as a result of decreased personnel time required to support the established customer base. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $8,156,000 compared to $5,413,000 in 2005, an increase of $2,743,000, or 50%. The main increase relates to a bad debt write off of the Khan deposit of $1,200,000. In addition, because of the cash constraints experienced over the last several years, we have operated with as few personnel as possible. In order to address staffing requirements related to the increasing level of business activity, we engaged third party contractors during late 2005 and through the beginning of the second quarter of 2006, and began to hire additional personnel in April 2006. Personnel expenses recorded in 2006 include $462,000 of stock option expense related to the adoption of SFAS 123R, which requires the expensing of stock-based compensation (stock options). In addition to the increase in personnel expenses, the primary reasons for the increase in SG&A expenses as compared to 2005 relate to additional software licensing, computer supplies and other computer infrastructure expenses of $113,000 related to our growing business, as well as an increase in legal expenses of $128,000 related to the change in control. Increases in travel and marketing expenses in 2006 were offset by a reduction in facilities expenses in 2006, as we renegotiated our headquarters lease in the first quarter of 2006. Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $1,231,000 and $825,000 respectively, an increase of $406,000, or 49%, in 2006 over 2005. The increase in expense in 2006 primarily relates to ongoing work associated with improving the data interchange inbound interface capabilities of our PECOS technology. Additionally, the increase in research and development expense is due to an increased level of development activity as noted above, as well as stock-based compensation expense of $139,000. Operating Loss. We reported a loss from operations of $6,841,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to a loss of $4,242,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase in the operating loss of $2,599,000 or 61%. This increased operating loss in 2006 compared to 2005 was primarily due to the increase in SG&A expenses and research and development expenses in 2006. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $69,000, a decrease of $1,536,000 over the $1,605,000 of interest expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in interest expense was due primarily to $1,419,000 recorded in 2005 as non-cash amortization of the beneficial conversion feature on the ten-year 10% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2013 issued by us. The Debentures converted into common stock in December 2005. Interest and Other Income, Net. Interest and other income, net for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $78,000 versus $7,000, for the year ended December 31, 2005. The change from 2005 to 2006 is largely due to the interest income related to funds raised during 2006. Net Loss. We generated a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $6,832,000, versus a net loss of $5,840,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase in the loss of $992,000, or 17%. Liquidity and Capital Resources Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $6.3 million, resulting primarily from a net loss from continuing operations of $6.8 million. This cash outflow included the $1.2 million of the performance bond that was deposited with an individual, Mr. Arshad A Khan. The funds advanced as a performance bond to Mr. Khan were due to be returned to us on or before the May 15, 2007. As of the date of this filing, the funds have not been returned. In light of this, we have written off the entire balance as a bad debt (SG&A expense) as of December 31, 2006. We have initiated legal proceedings against Mr. Khan personally to recover this amount. This transaction has had a material effect on our cash position and will require the raising of additional capital. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in its actions against Mr. Khan. As previously announced, on October 23, 2006, we agreed to issue an aggregate of 76,336,289 shares to investors in the U.K., and listed the Shares on the AIM Exchange. We raised a total of $2.5 million in cash, net of issuance costs. The Regulation S Shares were sold at a price of £0.0175 (approximately $0.03297) per share. The funds derived from the 2006 issuance of common stock are being used to support our working capital requirements. Subsequent to year-end, on February 5, 2007, we agreed to issue 73,230,009 shares to investors in the U.K. and listed the shares on the AIM Exchange. As was the case in 2005 and 2006, the shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration under Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for offshore placements, and therefore are subject to the same restrictions as the Regulation S Shares sold previously. Elcom raised a total of $2.5 million in cash, net of issuance costs of $23,948. The funds derived from the 2007 issuance of common stock on the AIM Exchange are being used to support our working capital requirements. At December 31, 2006, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents of $1,086,000 and net accounts receivable of $692,000. Our principal commitment consists of a lease on our headquarter office facility. We will also require ongoing investments in research and development and property, equipment and software in order to further increase operating revenues and meet the requirements of its customers. Risk Factors Relating to Liquidity Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern for 2007. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Malone & Bailey, P.C., have issued a report dated December 17, 2007 that included an explanatory paragraph referring to the significant operating losses and substantial doubt in its ability to continue as a going concern without generating incremental operating revenues or, if required, additional capital becoming available. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital. We are currently in discussions with a number of financing sources with a view to securing additional capital. It is anticipated that the outcome of these discussions will be finalized in the first quarter of 2008. Factors Affecting Future Performance A significant portion of our revenues are from license and associated fees received from Capgemini under a back-to-back contract between Elcom and Capgemini which essentially mirrors the primary agreement between Capgemini and the Scottish Executive, executed in November 2001. Future revenue under this arrangement is contingent on the following significant factors: the rate of adoption of our ePurchasing solution by Public Entities associated with the Scottish Executive; renewal by existing Public Entity clients associated with the Scottish Executive of their rights to use the ePurchasing solution; the procurement of additional services from us by Public Entities associated with the Scottish Executive; Capgemini's relationship with the Scottish Executive; and their compliance with the terms and conditions of their agreement with the Scottish Executive and our ability to perform under our agreement with Capgemini. In addition, during July 2007 we committed incremental resources to provide the eProcurement and eMarketplace components of the Zanzibar eMarketplace for public sector organizations in the U.K. under our agreements with PASSL and PA. Future revenue under this arrangement is contingent primarily on the timing and rate of adoption by U.K. Public Entities of the Zanzibar eMarketplace. The Zanzibar eMarketplace agreements provide for one-time installation fees and recurring monthly hosting services fees, as well as payments to us for certain development work. The agreements do not provide PASSL with unfettered rights to the underlying Elcom technology, and therefore we anticipate that our realized development fees will be ratably recognized over the applicable term of the agreement. As of December 2006, four U.K. Public Entities officially "went live", and as of December 2007, this number had increased to nine. We are currently in a contractual dispute with PA Consulting in respect of the Zanzibar contract; we are also considering initiating an intellectual property claim against the same firm. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in any potential IP claim against PA Consulting. If further business fails to develop under the Capgemini agreement or if the Zanzibar eMarketplace does not attract a profitable level of clients, or if the U.S. initiatives do not expand as expected, or if we are unable to perform under any of these agreements, it would have a material adverse effect on our future financial results. Outlook As evidenced by the level of SG&A and research and development, our expenditures in 2006 have increased as compared to 2005 and years prior to 2005. Because of cash constraints experienced over the last several years, we had to address staffing requirements related to its increasing level of business activity. The number of our employees increased by eleven in 2006, although it has subsequently decreased by eight. SG&A and research and development expenses included $666,000 of combined stock option expense related to the initial implementation of SFAS 123R, which requires the expensing of stock-based compensation (stock options). In addition to personnel increases and stock-based compensation, increases in expenditures related to additional software licensing, computer supplies and other computer infrastructure expenses related to our growing business were experienced. Improvements in revenues and operating results from operations in future periods will not occur without our being able to generate incremental operating revenues from existing and new clients. Independent accountants and internal controls On September 20, 2007, we dismissed Vitale Caturano & Company, Ltd ("VCC") as our principal independent accountants. The decision to dismiss VCC was approved by our audit committee and board of directors. The report of VCC for our 2005 financial statements did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting principles, except that the report contained an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 , there were no disagreements between the Company and VCC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to VCC's satisfaction would have caused VCC to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report. In preparing the audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, management and VCC discovered that, during the fourth quarter of 2006, a cash deposit made by the Company with a sales agent of Euro1,000,000 (approximately $1,200,000) in connection with a potential bid for government contracts outside the United States was completed without approval of our board. As a result of this discovery, we investigated the transaction and further reviewed our internal controls. During this review, we and VCC identified certain material weaknesses in our internal controls relating to approval of transactions and cash management. Since such review, we have strengthened our internal controls by adopting additional internal controls policies and procedures relating to cash, cash management and corporate governance. VCC performed no work subsequent to the commencement of the Company's additional review and investigation. On August 30, 2007, we engaged Malone & Bailey PC ("MB") as our new principal independent accountant to audit our financial statements for, 2006 and 2007. During the two most recent fiscal years and the interim period preceding the engagement of MB, we did not consult with MB regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and MB did not provide a written report or oral advice to us that was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or an event identified in Item 304(a) (1)(iv) of Regulation S-B. In deciding to select MB, our Audit Committee considered MB's experience and expertise related to public companies, as well as reviewed auditor independence issues and existing commercial relationships with MB. The Audit Committee concluded that MB has no commercial or other relationship that would impair its independence and has the appropriate expertise that we required regarding our current operations. Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level because of material weaknesses. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has defined a material weakness as a "significant deficiency or combination of significant deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected." In relation to the audit for the year ended December 31, 2006, management and our independent registered public accounting firm identified the following material weaknesses in our internal controls:a contract in which a cash performance bond of Euro1,000,000 (approximately $1,200,000) was posted was entered into in the 4th quarter of 2006 without proper Board approval. Following the identification of this material weakness, the Board consulted with the independent registered public accounting firm and engaged outside counsel to provide advice to the Board as to the remedial action to be adopted in these circumstances. Based on outside counsel's advice, the Board appointed two Directors who had no involvement or visibility in connection with this transaction to undertake an investigation of the transaction in the first instance, followed by a full evaluation of corporate governance. We delayed the submission of the Form 10-KSB in order to conclude the investigation. The investigation concluded that the corporate governance procedures were inadequate during the period in question and that these deficiencies constituted a material weakness in the corporate governance and the disclosure controls and procedures. STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed herein could include forward-looking statements or information. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, those with respect to our objectives, plans and strategies set forth herein and those preceded by or that include the words "believes," "expects," "targets," "intends," "anticipates," "plans," or similar expressions, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that our expectations are, or will be, correct. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause our future results to differ materially from those anticipated, including: (i) the necessity for us to generate incremental operating revenues and whether this objective can be met given the overall marketplace and client's acceptance and usage of eCommerce software systems, eProcurement and eMarketplace solutions including corporate demand therefore, the impact of competitive technologies, products and pricing, particularly given the substantially larger size and scale of certain competitors and potential competitors, and control of expenses and revenue growth; (ii) the consequent results of operations given the aforementioned factors; (iii) the necessity to achieve profitable operations within the constraints of its existing resources and, if it can not, the availability of incremental capital funding; and (iv) other risks detailed from time to time in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and in our other SEC reports and statements. We assume no obligation to update any of the information contained or referenced herein or in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and other disclosures contained in the Company's 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended and Forms 10-QSB for the periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2006, as well as the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data) For the year ended December 31 2006 2005 $ $ Net revenues: License hosting services and other fees 2,710 2,081 Professional services 508 633 -------- -------- 3,218 2,714 Cost of revenues 672 718 -------- -------- Gross profit 2,546 1,996 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative 8,156 5,413 Research and development 1,231 825 -------- -------- Total operating expenses 9,387 6,238 -------- -------- Operating loss (6,841) (4,242) Interest expense (69) (1,605) Interest and other income, net 78 7 -------- -------- Income loss before income taxes (6,832) (5,840) Income taxes - - -------- -------- Net loss (6,832) (5,840) Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 281 (29) -------- -------- Comprehensive loss (6,551) (5,869) -------- -------- Basic and diluted net loss per share (0.01) (0.08) -------- -------- Weighted average number of basic and diluted shares outstanding 416,209 72,173 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited, in thousands) December 31 2006 2005 $ $ Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 1,086 6,399 Accounts receivable, net 692 503 Prepaids and other current assets 218 119 ------- ------- Total current assets 1,996 7,021 ------- ------- Property, equipment and software, net of depreciation 959 743 Other assets 14 10 ------- ------- 2,969 7,774 ======= ======= Liabilities and stockholders' equity Current liabilities: Loans payable - 1,299 Other current liabilities 3,812 4,765 Current liabilities of discontinued 42 62 operations ------- ------- Total current liabilities 3,854 6,126 Capital lease obligation, net of current 164 - portion Other long term liabilities 288 423 ------- ------- Total liabilities 4,306 6,549 ------- ------- Total stockholders' (deficit) equity (1,337) 1,225 ------- ------- 2,969 7,774 ======= ======= CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited, in thousands) For the year ended December 31 2006 2005 $ $ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss (6,832) (5,840) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 399 1,752 Non-cash interest expense - 145 Stock based compensation 666 1 Deferred rent expense - 312 Provisions for (reversals of) allowance for doubtful (35) 2 accounts Changes in current assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (154) (198) Prepaids and other current assets (103) (66) Accounts payable 100 79 Deferred revenue 398 35 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (706) 1,113 ------- ------- Net cash used in continuing operations (6,267) (2,665) Net cash used in discontinued operations (20) (241) ------- ------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of property, equipment and software (301) (57) ------- ------- Net cash used in investing activities (301) (57) Net cash provided by investing activities of - 48 discontinued operations ------- ------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Repayment of capital lease obligations (65) (30) Proceeds from loans payable - 2,269 Repayment of related party notes (120) - Repayment of convertible loans (1,179) (318) Decrease in other long term liability (135) (123) Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net 2,493 7,155 ------- ------- Net cash provided by financing activities 994 8,953 ------- ------- FOREIGN EXCHANGE EFFECT ON CASH 281 (29) ------- ------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (5,313) 6,009 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 6,399 390 ------- ------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD 1,086 6,399 ------- ------- SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Interest paid 68 26 Income taxes paid - - Discount on convertible debentures - 517 Conversion of convertible debentures to equity - 1,587 Conversion of loans payable to equity - 674 Issuance of common stock in satisfaction of deferred 250 - rent Cost of capital reduction 580 - The financial information contained herein is unaudited and has been extracted from the Company's 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB which contains audited financial information. A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Company is set out in the Company's Annual Report. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END FR OKDKKPBDDKBB
1 Year Elcom Itl Chart |
1 Month Elcom Itl Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions