Eirx Therapeutics Share Discussion Threads

[asmodeus] 12/2/2015 18:07

And is not one shareholder who follows this thread going to attend?

[officerdigby] 12/2/2015 14:23

Why what difference does it will it make to s/h's?

please none of this, nudge nudge win wink nonsense of last 8 years!

[skez13] 10/2/2015 18:57

officer


Mike reminds me of Comical Ali..

[officerdigby] 03/2/2015 13:56

This highly unseasonal we've just had Christmas but it seems S/H's have to vote for it again!

Love it that your still alluding to something happening at this stage Mike111D. You'd do good pep talks on death row, or perhaps a motivational speaker in various eastern European locations during past troubled times..

"Look on the bright side everybody!"

[mike111d] 03/2/2015 13:14

If your shares are held in a nominee account you will in all likelihood need to call your broker to have them lodge your vote on yor behalf, as in most cases they will not have distributed proxy forms directly to you based upon my experience with different brokers.

[mike111d] 03/2/2015 12:13

Correct, the vote on the 13th is to appoint them, they have not been formally appointed at this time.

[edjodav] 03/2/2015 09:33

looks like everyone shafted again ... shareholders will get nothing just been on the phone to kingston smith who say that there is a meeting on the 13th however they have not been appointed yet

[skez13] 02/2/2015 21:47

Kties

"successfully bringing claims against directors who have defrauded the company"

will that also include, raising funds from private investors for a project that never materialised?

[alby220] 02/2/2015 20:21

Exactly ! Mike. not all over as yet. Imo Only.

[asmodeus] 02/2/2015 19:49

Ah now I think I'm beginning to get the drift....

[mike111d] 02/2/2015 19:49

...... and mine.

A shame that the directors have had to go down this path but needs must and as they say it is not over until the fat lady sings.

[impala391] 02/2/2015 19:43

Go go michaela , if she can find the truth in this lot ,she's got my vote!

[kteis] 02/2/2015 18:33

Michaela Hall
Partner - Kingston Smith & Partners LLP

Michaela joined Kingston Smith & Partners as a partner in our St Albans office from another medium-sized practice in August 2011. With approaching 20 years in the industry, Michaela has been an appointment taking Insolvency Practitioner for over 10 years.

She has particular expertise in Administrations and Forensic Investigations and sector specialisms include professional practices, the licensed trade and trading-on manufacturing businesses and retail outlets. She has worked on a number of cases where detailed investigations have led to further realisations, either as a result of revealing additional assets or successfully bringing claims against directors who have defrauded the company and its creditors.

Michaela is also licensed with the ICAEW

hxxp://www.kingstonsmith.co.uk/people/michaela-hall/

[asmodeus] 02/2/2015 16:23

According to the notice I received, there are just two resolutions: No.1., the "special resolution" that the Company be wound up voluntarily and No.2, "the ordinary resolution" that Michaela Hall..........be appointed liquidator (for that purpose).

[lundylou] 02/2/2015 15:00

Any idea what the resolutions are to be voted upon?
Nothing's been published; there's no website.

[asmodeus] 02/2/2015 11:30

Surely at least one of those convinced that Michaela is going to "extract things from a hat" is going?

[asmodeus] 29/1/2015 19:55

Liquidation Meeting 2.00 p.m. Friday 13th. Feb.105 St Peter's Street, St. Albans. Anybody going? (I'm not - too far away).

[alby220] 29/1/2015 17:14

In my opinion OD, You are barking up the wrong tree. I feel your scenario is not at all correct at present. And I would suggest you wait a bit longer before you and we, assume all is lost.

[ewads] 29/1/2015 15:12

I think John K Pool has given the thumbs down to the last two posts.

[espeland2] 29/1/2015 13:36

Agreed, OD. AIM is a wonderful tool for getting investors' money out of them. I guess all of us who invested in it deserve nothing more. Luckily I got out of here in time to get at least some of my capital back, but it's a sobering thing to see names I remember still waiting and hoping.

[officerdigby] 29/1/2015 10:54

This is all very naughty. The Co appears to have been kept afloat just to enable the court case! Once that was won and the S/H got the payout. No reason to fund the Co any more. In essence the pre-IPO helped the case and now you can vote so they can all tidily keep the IP for something else, most probably one of the plans proffered at the pre-IPO except the ones that paid for it won't be part of the capital structure.

Naughty but it happens a lot!

[asmodeus] 26/1/2015 14:07

"any return would be a bonus." Of course! Who would disagree?