Eirx Therapeutics Share Discussion Threads

[alby220] 26/1/2015 12:20

Totally agree N.D.

[noddie dealer] 26/1/2015 11:14

I only way i can think we may recover something is if our patents / research is sold to generate more than our current debts and costs of Micheala.

Im not sure of the current number of shares in issue but does anybody know how much our assests would need to be worth to even cover our debt / costs??

I have written my shares off so any return would be a bonus.

[alby220] 26/1/2015 08:58

Imo. I defiantly don't think all is lost just yet. We have no other option but to follow it through, and see what ever the outcome brings forward. I have voted

[asmodeus] 25/1/2015 21:25

Presumably Alby, and others, you believe that Michaela is going to unearth assets of which the Directors are unaware?

[alby220] 25/1/2015 14:18

Rest assured it is still worth voting, imo all is not lost, just yet.

[noddie dealer] 25/1/2015 12:24

If the statement is correct ie'insovlent', surely nothing for share holders. If the company were 'solvent', then any assets after costs / debt would be divided. Seems clear to me. Am I wrong??? Is it worth voting if the statement is correct

[asmodeus] 17/1/2015 22:03

Many thanks. I haven't been following this for a long time, and so have seen no recent figures. But the Directors seem to believe the Company is insolvent...

[alby220] 17/1/2015 17:22

"That is a distinct possibility"
Totally agree.

[prodasyl] 17/1/2015 17:02

That is a distinct possibility

[asmodeus] 17/1/2015 15:27

In what way does it not extinguish hope, prodasyl? Do you believe there are assets that exceed debts?

[prodasyl] 17/1/2015 08:40

smcl Thank you for wishing me well. The "straw clutching" was merely by way of reference to seaclipper's dismissive jibe at 1664.

What I can see is that we are pursuing the appropriate path(Creditors voluntary liquidation), given our extant situation . In my view, that is the best procedural course of action that does not extinguish hope or expectation.

[prodasyl] 17/1/2015 08:40

smcl Thank you for wishing me well. The "straw clutching" was merely by way of reference to seaclipper's dismissive jibe at 1664.

What I can see is that we are pursuing the appropriate path(Creditors voluntary liquidation), given our extant situation . In my view, that is the best procedural course of action that does not extinguish hope or expectation.

[smcl] 16/1/2015 10:58

Prodasyl - what are the 'Straws' to which we might 'clutch at? Can't see it myself.

Anyway best of luck to you in this regard.

sm

[prodasyl] 15/1/2015 18:47

May I suggest that it is far less unproductive and much more benign to " clutch at straws" than to engage in mud slinging.

[smcl] 15/1/2015 17:14

Agreed. We have had Mike111D talk rubbish for years on this stock as if he was the universal expert with insider knowledge. The guy knows nothing more than any other investor on this or any other bulletin board.

Note the 'D'at the end of his name.

D - I feel should stand for Dipstick - I suggest he includes a prefix of 'T' to read Mike111TD - i.e Total Dipstick'. Most appropriate considering the outcome here!!

What a total waste.


sm

[seaclipper] 15/1/2015 17:05

Some still clutching at straws - its OVER guys GONE.

[pwhite73] 14/1/2015 23:18

Mike111D - "There again as someone who invested in the prior pre-IPO what would I know."

What you should know is that its a criminal offence to procure money under false pretences and that it can result in a fine and or imprisonment under The Fraud Act 2006 S2.

[skez13] 14/1/2015 21:58

i know



1.sell any IP etc to a unknown newly formed company.

2.keep a low profile for a few months after liquidation..

3.newly formed Company (point 1) applies for a IPO on aim.

4. offer gets heavily promoted by certain posters on bulletin boards.

[asmodeus] 14/1/2015 21:00

What would you know, indeed, Mike.

[mike111d] 14/1/2015 20:43

prodasyl, yes an important distinction to make IMO.

There again as someone who invested in the prior pre-IPO what would I know.

[alby220] 14/1/2015 20:32

It's not a scam for sure,imo and it is not over yet, please vote as suggested .

[officerdigby] 14/1/2015 16:27

I reckon there is chance that you might get 0.18p total back!I wonder who will finally make many out of this, or perhaps they already have! The last post in the website was kind of a shambolic little jibe about how reasonable it would have been to close the thing down in 2008. Nothing ever about what was actually done with the new money! That raising was a scam IMO and those involved with the pedalling of it should be ashamed end of.

[tiltonboy] 14/1/2015 14:07

No point in voting. The company is insolvent; there is no hope. Some people just won't let go.

You have been done like a kipper, just accept it.