We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Alphabet Inc | NASDAQ:GOOG | NASDAQ | Common Stock |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.33 | 0.83% | 160.315 | 160.32 | 160.36 | 161.59 | 159.41 | 160.03 | 12,045,267 | 22:10:36 |
By John D. McKinnon
Republicans are focusing almost exclusively on the effects of social media on children in their questions for the executives.
It's early days yet. But that issue could become fodder for an eventual legislative bargain that would be similar to the one that led to Section 230 in the first place.
Section 230 was a part of a much larger package known as the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which sought to restrict access to obscene, indecent and offensive materials online for people under the age of 18. Section 230 was added to the legislation to balance the package for the platforms.
Ultimately the Supreme Court struck down all the restrictions but left Section 230 intact. Republicans could be starting to make a case for trying again on measures to shield children from some online content, possibly as part of a package that would also reform 230.
This item is part of a Wall Street Journal live coverage event. The full stream can be found by searching P/WSJL (WSJ Live Coverage).
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 25, 2021 14:08 ET (18:08 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
1 Year Alphabet Chart |
1 Month Alphabet Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions