ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

U.S. Judge Rules Against BP - Again

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

It has been wisely said that, “Just because you are paranoid, it does not mean that people aren’t out to get you.” BP’s share price (LSE:BP.) (NYSE:BP) is being battered once again by the never-ending repercussions of the Deepwater Horizon tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico. The oil giant is beginning to look like the 97-lb. weakling who gets sand kicked in his face by thugs at the beach. And it’s beginning to look a lot like the U.S. government is out to get them.

In the wake of seemingly endless claims and litigation, BP presented its case today before U.S. District Court Judge Carl Barbier, seeking to have “hundreds of millions of dollars” in nearly 800 excessive and false claims already paid to claimants returned. Apparently, Judge Barbier is well-paid. Whilst BP pleaded for “equity and fairness,” Barbier ruled that the company was splitting hairs. It’s more like BP is funding claimants’ heirs.

BP’s suit was focused particularly on 208 claimants to whom they paid $185 million in excessive claims as well other claimants who should never have been awarded damages at all.

I’ve said it here before, and I will say it again. Don’t ever mess with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Once they find you are a sizable money source in violation of the Clean Water Act, they will come after you like a vampire on a dark night. And they carry a lot of weight in the judicial system.

The basis for BP’s claim rested on the accepted fact that the overpayments occurred as a result of the original method of calculating claimant’s losses. That method, as any first year accounting major would realize, did not including matching revenues and expenses. On 02 October 2013, Patrick Juneau, the claims administrator, ordered Judge Barbier, to correct the inadequacies of the accounting methodology. He did. Today, however, Barbier viewed the October 2013 decision, not as a rule to be followed, but as a stake-in-the-ground.

Just in case you’ve been living under a rock, it is interesting to note that Judge Barbier is also the same judge who ruled that BP was grossly negligent, causing the Deepwater Horizon spill. He is also the same judge who will be determining the financial penalties that will be assessed against BP as a result of that ruling.

I don’t know whether the powers that be at BP are paranoid or not. They should be.

BP shares closed down 0.24% at 464.95 in London today. The NYSE is still open as of this time. Shares are down now precisely the same percentage at 45.61.

 

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com