ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

Warren Buffett’s takeover of Wesco Financial

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

To stop the directors of Wesco giving away too much of the company to shareholders of Santa Barbara savings and loans Buffett and Munger came up with a two-pronged strategy.

© ADVFN

First, Blue Chip needed to increase its voting rights. It bought more shares, paying up to $17, until it had 17% (The regulators prevented an unapproved shareholding of more than 20% in S&L companies).

Second, they needed to persuade members of the board that this merger was not in the best interests of shareholders. Munger asked for a meeting with Wesco’s CEO, Louis Vincenti, but was politely told that the deal will go ahead if shareholders approved following a recommendation from the board.

The rebuffed Munger then looked to Betty Caspers Peters. At first Don Koeppel, President of Blue Chip, spoke to Peters, but he was sent away.

Then Buffett phoned. Fortunately, she had just finished reading about Buffett and his Graham-based philosophy in the book Supermoney (Jerry Goodman, “Adam Smith”, 1972), where he is described as a clear thinker, full of business wisdom. Suitably impressed, she agreed to meet him only 24 hours later.

They met in a lounge at San Francisco airport. While they hit it off straight away, Peters made it plain that she wanted something done at Wesco. Buffett asked if, instead of the merger, he might be allowed to give it a try. He was convinced that he could generate more value for shareholders. And, after all, as Peters read in Supermoney, he had an impressive record in boosting returns in the companies he controlled.

But what if Buffett was incapacitated, or was run over by a bus and killed? Where would her and her brother’s shares be then? Well, Charlie Munger was a fine person to take over. After all, Buffett trusted Munger’s intelligence and integrity to such a degree that he had already arranged for him to manage Berkshire Hathaway and his family shareholdings if he was unable to.

After three hours it was agreed that Peters would lobby the board for a cessation of merger plans.

Following a second meeting, this time with Munger as well as Buffett, Peters was willing to press the board to arrange a meeting with the two of them. When she attempted this she found a determination to go ahead with the merger rather than discuss it further. Annoyed, she got her family to vote against it.

What happened next?

The merger plan was defeated by a shareholder………To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com