Xlmedia Share Discussion Threads

[tomstone12] 10/11/2019 11:49

funny thing is that that guys actually think KM85 was serious when he said he is being paid to post :)

[ggbarabajagal] 10/11/2019 11:29

Before I hand over to our CFO, it is worth reflecting on regulation of Internet gambling in America. In 2013, 3 U.S. states regulated. For nearly 4 years after 2013, little happened until Pennsylvania regulated Internet gambling in October of 2017. Then several months later, in May 2018, the Supreme Court lifted the federal ban on sports betting, and GAN launched Internet sports betting in New Jersey for our clients just 4 months later.

In the first 6 months of 2019, we've all witnessed a phenomenal amount of regulatory action in America. The indolent political pontification of prior years was replaced with hard legislative action in 2019, which in the first half saw bills enabling Internet gambling pass in Rhode Island, Montana, Indiana, Iowa, Tennessee, and perhaps most significantly, the state of Illinois, which surprised everyone back in June by legalizing Internet gambling on the last day of the Illinois legislative session. Each legislative bill passed into law creates a step change in the addressable market for U.S. Internet gambling operators and their infrastructure providers such as GAN. And I'm delighted to devise that GAN has recently received notice from an existing client for launch Internet sports betting in the state of Indiana, subject to regulatory consents. This existing client wishes to remain anonymous pending all parties' receipt of necessary regulatory consents, and we look forward to updating the market further in due course. The state of Indiana offers our shareholders to a population of 6.7 million and represents the third United States state that GAN will operate our technology platform in, having long established ourselves in New Jersey, and more recently, in the popular state of Pennsylvania.


Superb for Xlm

[ihatemms] 10/11/2019 09:46

Good luck km85.

[bookbroker] 10/11/2019 09:40

What a pathetic discussion is taking place, stick to the knitting folk, it is about whether this company can start to grow its earnings again, not whether or not the chief is profiteering at the expense of shareholders. You got to take any company with a pinch of salt, no director is whiter than white these days, most are grossly overpaid, but that is the market! Do you know if this Israeli dude takes a salary, maybe he does, maybe he doesn’t!

[km85] 10/11/2019 09:34

Ihatemms, You might call them positive comments, but they are facts. IF you can not tell the difference then I Cannot help. I never said you should buy because a CEO is buying or selling, you just need to do your own homework. So basically you think XLM raised capital to buy back shares at less 1 Pounds? Well the company raised money and spent it on acquisitions and when the stock dropped they bought back as a business and he bought more too. I highly recommend you to read a book called the Outsiders: Eight Unconventional CEOs and Their Radically Rational Blueprint for Success. Buffett himself, in the past, issued new shares, when they are high, to acquire companies and buy back shares when they priced down. He recently was happily dancing when Apple bought back punch of shares.

You also mentioned you preferred honest transparent companies Like Future. Is that because the stock went up 12x in the last few years. Because XLM business is just similar to Future. Future acquired new vertical and expand their main verticals and used its own technology to maintain those sites. Ah forgot to mention the lady CEO of Future also bought shares. Ah forgot to mention, keep forgetting, about 2 years ago XLM raised extra 7% new shares to acquire businesses, and last week FUTURE also raised extra 7% new shares to acquire business too!
I think when/if Future stock drops they will buy back shares. Simple

[ihatemms] 10/11/2019 09:27

I don’t like people ramping a company as if they’re being altruistic but actually they’re being paid to do it. But fair play to KM85 - at least he admits it. Anyway I won’t be posting on the board anymore. And as I said good luck and best wishes to all holders.

[jltaylor1001] 10/11/2019 08:22

Ok so why hang out on forums about XLM if you've washed your hands of them slating other posters?

[malcolmmm] 10/11/2019 00:11

I bought these for 75p in 2014 and traded them along the way selling at 218p in 2017.
Good trading very volatile share but the div is good. They have been trying to break into the American market for years so perhaps fortunes are changing. imo is going to be a rocky ride

[ponyten] 09/11/2019 19:00

Please ignore ihatemms KM85. Your posts are appreciated and informative.

[seans66] 09/11/2019 18:49

please carry on, i find your posts useful & interesting

[jltaylor1001] 09/11/2019 18:19

Steady on he's allowed a view !

[km85] 09/11/2019 16:04

Yes I am getting paid to post. If that makes you feel good.

[nw99] 09/11/2019 16:01

Follow the huge director buy

[ihatemms] 09/11/2019 16:00

For heavens sake give a rest Km85 . This is is the only stock you post on. I wonder why? Any back-handers from XLM?

[km85] 09/11/2019 15:44

Ben Graham once said: “You're neither right nor wrong because other people agree with you. You're right because your facts are right and your reasoning is right – that's the only thing that makes you right. And if your facts and reasoning are right, you don't have to worry about anybody else.”

We do not have to buy or sell just because CEO or Ory buys. We need to identify the reason why he is buying. Is it because he wants to play the market game? or because he thinks the share is cheap relative to the quality and the potential future of the business? I think the latter one.

[nw99] 09/11/2019 15:37

Stays in modelPortfolio still a buy

[km85] 09/11/2019 15:12

I personally do not care what they or others said. I just follow my homework. Make no sense to tell your readers: hey go sell because CEO is buying. There is no valid reason to recommend selling imo.

[km85] 09/11/2019 15:09

Not even 2 weeks. From 52 to 67p is a 29% increase in less than 10 trading days.

[vincentlouise] 09/11/2019 14:50

Investors cronicle suggest sell rec this week, as Ory Weihs purchases do little to calm investors fears, they have risen 25% in 2 weeks !

[km85] 09/11/2019 13:20

Yes they think it is worth to follow Ory lead when he bought shares last month.

[jltaylor1001] 09/11/2019 12:47

Interesting SCSW. No surprise top up suggested ! Interesting 2 swap out in growth portfolio