We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workspace Group Plc | LSE:WKP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B67G5X01 | ORD GBP1 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-4.00 | -0.72% | 552.00 | 552.00 | 553.00 | 564.00 | 548.00 | 564.00 | 91,776 | 15:46:43 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Estate Investment Trust | 174.2M | -37.8M | -0.1970 | -28.12 | 1.06B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
15/4/2011 16:22 | 50.0p is just ridiculous 40p'll do nicely then, thank you :) | catcheemonkee | |
15/4/2011 16:18 | With a re-rating and the look of the current chart, this has every opportunity of ticking up to 50p in the next year. My opinion, we shall have to beg to differ. Don't forget to buy back in soon :- | mreasygoing | |
15/4/2011 15:33 | mreasygoing - 15 Apr'11 - 15:21 - 7319 of 7319 Sounds like a man who has sold some or all of his holding (around 26p) and hoped to buy back lower, only to se it go higher. If not, why de-ramp ? I'm not ramping or de-ramping - 50.0p is just ridiculous - as stocka has pointed out already - what are you smoking? FYI 50.0p would be a 66% premium to the NAV if the NAV was 30.0p which it's not, it's currently 28.0p. I think you need to study 'Property stocks for beginners'... | purplebox | |
15/4/2011 15:21 | Sounds like a man who has sold some or all of his holding (around 26p) and hoped to buy back lower, only to se it go higher. If not, why de-ramp ? | mreasygoing | |
15/4/2011 14:53 | Stockadoodle - 15 Apr'11 - 09:46 - 7314 of 7315 "50p with ease"!!! HaHa.. What are you guys smoking? LOL That's exactly what I thought when I read the post - for the avoidance of doubt, 50.0p is NOT possible within the next year. | purplebox | |
15/4/2011 14:40 | This will be re-rated and 50p is certainly a target over the next year ! | mreasygoing | |
15/4/2011 09:46 | "50p with ease"!!! HaHa.. What are you guys smoking? LOL | stockadoodle | |
14/4/2011 21:51 | The city like this company and a breakthrough past 30p should take this one to 50p with ease. | the jackel | |
14/4/2011 00:12 | Holding nicely at the highs, this is now primed to move higher. Would like to see a steady tick up from here. Am very confident about this company. There is little to stop this rising to 50p now on the chart in time. | mreasygoing | |
14/4/2011 00:05 | steady steady | brando69 | |
13/4/2011 17:42 | softly softly Catchee Monkee | catcheemonkee | |
11/4/2011 14:25 | nicely nicely | brando69 | |
08/4/2011 16:36 | Closed at 26.75p. Halved it's losses in the auction :-). | purplebox | |
08/4/2011 16:08 | finding support at 26? | brando69 | |
08/4/2011 16:06 | Seems to be in it's own private hell hole today :-(. And earlier in the week I was thinking that it had held it's recent gains extreamly well during the CGT season. Results in early June - I'm estimating a 0.55p dividend. | purplebox | |
07/4/2011 17:16 | Closed at 27.25p. A Shot in the Dark - 7 Apr'11 - 16:30 - 7304 of 7304 wow some one else who had an Apple II - I had one back in the day; cost pretty much all of £6000. If I'd put that into Apple shares instead I'd probably be retired by now... Yes - very true :-(. | purplebox | |
07/4/2011 16:30 | wow some one else who had an Apple II - I had one back in the day; cost pretty much all of £6000. If I'd put that into Apple shares instead I'd probably be retired by now... | a shot in the dark | |
06/4/2011 21:16 | It's a mystery... ...the only problem with the iPad is that the TDW site bars access to Safari. They may join the modern world in the summer I'm told. Otherwise - the iPad is really cool - even if it's only a discounted MK1 from Tesco Direct :-). It's the first Apple I've owned since my beloved Apple II back in my university days. | purplebox | |
06/4/2011 21:12 | can i venture that they are one in the same? | brando69 | |
06/4/2011 21:01 | Who is this 'purpleipad' guy anyway... | purplebox | |
06/4/2011 21:00 | Who is this 'purplebox' guy anyway... | purpleipad | |
06/4/2011 19:21 | purpleipad is hardly trashing this thread... he's stating hard facts - the numpter who wrote of a 97% fall completely omitted to mention that there was a rights issue resulting in increased share capital | brando69 | |
06/4/2011 19:13 | purpleipad - 6 Apr'11 - 18:22 - 7295 of 7297 I don't mean you purplebox, I mean someone with a very similiar name ! | mreasygoing |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions