Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[luckyorange] 18/11/2019 09:12

The evaluation for the arch has taken place and that is why it is in situ testing in Bristol and yes it does contain graphene but is a polymer known as Polygrene... keep up!

[alchemy] 18/11/2019 09:10

I'd like to hear a riposte to that!

[kemorkid] 18/11/2019 09:08

Are we due a trading update ?

[supernumerary] 18/11/2019 08:59

Something to read while it's nice and quiet here. If Aecom are, as I think someone claimed, evaluating 60+ materials for their arch, I wonder if they're talking to Oak Ridge? The little video in the second link is very impressive, and I was struck by how similar a slice of a boat is to an arch. Presumably, Aecom will go with the cheapest material that meets their functional requirements, which may or may not contain graphene I suppose. As ever, time will tell...

[billwave] 18/11/2019 08:54

Reading previous posts it appears the reality of what is not happening here is slowly sinking in. A ridiculous market cap driven purely by a very clever and over exuberant individuals manipulation of social media. Still not one of the collaborations in the header come to fruition, numerous missed deadlines and no revenue stream being generated whatsoever. Indeed a business model that has yet even to be proved. Until that is achieved this company remains nothing but hype, fact. As I've said before, if this were PPI related all investors that were encouraged by NR's outstanding performance would have a financial claim for being mislead.

Teepee - you know what is worse than being a sheep? Being a sheep that doesn't think it's a sheep, it stands alone in the corner of the same field eating the same grass but somehow tries to convince others it is something other than just a sheep.

[ashehzi] 18/11/2019 08:44

Owenga, I think, some PIs moving money to other same cohort shares (IQE today e.g.). Nothing more. Drop doesn't match the combined traded volume of LSE & NEX.

[owenga] 18/11/2019 08:40

More buys than sells and we are down 4%. Tiny volume, crazy.

[adejuk] 18/11/2019 08:28

almost 2 months since agm and still....

[forestfred] 18/11/2019 08:11

A good place to be .

We have got how many collaborations still to get the results for from how many different sectors ..

And new ones no doubt being discussed .

A huge pipeline awaiting completion of testing to make graphene products globally commercial .

Many of which could be revolutionary so belief , time and patience will be our guide .

Just one of them could be transformational to the company and it’s shareholders and that industry in general.


Ff

[alchemy] 18/11/2019 08:05

Great. The back to bed , was an exhortation to but a very select few!

[ad631] 18/11/2019 07:45

Well Alchemy, my Tarot card reading predicts at least two RNS' in the next 15 working days:)

[alchemy] 18/11/2019 07:10

So back to bed?

[club sandwich] 18/11/2019 07:07

Oh look, no RNS. Again.

[club sandwich] 18/11/2019 06:21

Troll Hunter. I don’t recall ever making a price prediction as low as 700p. All of my predictions were far higher. Perhaps you can quote a post number - or apologise for making things up? In either case you're now filtered.

I do remember Graham’s £36 a share, though. Was that around the time he claimed VRS might end up worth £385bn? This from a company mgmt that still - more than 18 months later - can't currently break £10m in revenues...

[1teepee] 18/11/2019 02:16

Bit of a weird one hunting children's toys.Do you remember those trolls toys with long hair?

[1teepee] 18/11/2019 02:13

Troll hunter will not even attempt to explain why , he just deflected big time

[festario] 18/11/2019 01:23

I never planned to sell any of my shares at 200p, that's just plain wrong. Why would I ?I was still buying quite determinedly at 170p.Hence why my average was so badly damaged in the last 18 months.

[festario] 18/11/2019 01:21

No Troll Hunter, I sold the majority of my holding, because of the various concerns I've raised here in the past. Such as very poor figures in the accounts, unsatisfactory answers to direct questions I asked of our CEO, and the blind ramping I saw on here. But I still hold some.It was in February 2018 when SuperG boldly stated the share price would sail past 700p and he said that 3600 in the medium term was not demanding.Overall, as it stands today, selling what I did was the correct decision. But my point is a different one.Surely, those in control at VRS knew back them that neither Jinan or any other large deal was imminent... yet they continually made out that it was.

[1teepee] 18/11/2019 00:47

Do you suspect superg of spreading incorrect information?

[festario] 18/11/2019 00:06

Another shareholder has just reminded me of a very good point.Back in the 180p days, well over a year ago, we were being told about the so called catapults which would propel us past 700p.We saw lots of tweets about things being close, lots of nudges and winks about massive deals coming, 'near term'At that point, we would indeed have exploded from 180p, perhaps straight to 300p, 500p or beyond.However, nothing happened, and still hasn't.The point is, those in the know... Neill, Chris, Matt, Maybe even SuperG, they must have known that we weren't close to anything!That's shameful in my view.

[wuzy] 17/11/2019 22:51

Just watched it,very interesting l like earpiece translators and the air bike great ideas and yes you can see why China would like to embrace the best graphene from Versarien,bring it on.