Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[phoenixs] 18/9/2019 10:10

re production increases, you can be absolutely sure that Neill and his team have already put into their plans a schedule for ramping up from 3 tons to 30 tons per annum. They have been and still are many months ahead of us shareholders in what they know is coming down the line.

[bisho4] 18/9/2019 09:52

If you want to attend the AGM, I would email Sam ([e-mail]) to let him know, and ask what requirements there are for proof of share ownership.

Last year, I brought a screenshot of my holdings taken after the market had closed the day before and that was sufficient.

[nellyb] 18/9/2019 09:50

Yawn again.

[rainbow23] 18/9/2019 09:43

Nellyb. I think you need to get more sleep.

[jointer13] 18/9/2019 09:42

our know-how is worth a lot more than this alone.

[nellyb] 18/9/2019 09:32

rainbow, yawn.

[rainbow23] 18/9/2019 09:29

There was never any doubt that I was right. Pennyland was nailed on as more people realised that they were being fed large doses of fantasy. This is only the beginning of a spectacular crash. No revenues = no vrs.

[club sandwich] 18/9/2019 09:24

Fest - well he *was* right.

[wuzy] 18/9/2019 09:16

Drat, no more funds to top up. Oh well

[grabster] 18/9/2019 09:00

iAquaeSulis0118 Sep '19 - 07:54 - 78677 of 78688
0 0 2
grabster, do some basic research on Reach before you spout off incorrect statements


I am content to be corrected by someone who knows more than I do. No point me starting research from scratch on EU rules. Post something incorrect here and someone knowledgable will post chapter-and-verse within minutes. ;-)

[fireball xl5] 18/9/2019 08:52

BIGT will confirm VRS's production abilities.I note the HSE will be running REACH should the unthinkable happen in parallel. They will have the IT system ready for business. If dealings with the HSE are anything to go by progress will be leisurely. Duplication, another waste and 2 sets of data are never better than 1.

[cheek212] 18/9/2019 08:45

Didn't think I'd get the opportunity to buy some more at just above a pound! Thank you very much.

[alchemy] 18/9/2019 08:43

3 Whole Working Days . Before Christmas that would be 3 RNS S . Strategy the changed to 5 big targets . Paucity zone.Think Moses and forty days. Should be good when NR finds water!

[1teepee] 18/9/2019 08:43

I think it will be announced as a fundraise on Friday like last time. 16.30 I think it was

[affc21] 18/9/2019 08:37

NR mentioned a while ago that they were looking (and guessing trialling) at tweaking the graphene production process. Perhaps they were successful?

[alchemy] 18/9/2019 08:11

24 th Equinox plus 3 Tuesday next week.

[pcjoe] 18/9/2019 08:09

Spike - it’s needed now Imho - it’s crucial that mass production capability is proven to settle all the doubters out there - the mass reliable and cheaper production of quality Graphene is the holy grail - No Co has achieved it so far

As for custom - take a leaf out of Kevs book - “build it and they will come”

[soilderboy] 18/9/2019 08:07

Can anyone remind of the date for the AGM please?

[aquaesulis01] 18/9/2019 08:03

No grabster I do not. There are already moves to increase the graphene limit to 100 tonnes and I am hopeful it wont be too far away; just stating the current situation and what must change for graphene profits to take off.

[spike_1] 18/9/2019 08:01

Re query regarding VRS purchase of production machinery for 30 tonnes per annum:

my reading is that this is currently an exploratory / work up process with the machinery manufacturers.

At the point where bigger machinery is needed, it will then be purchased and - IMO - installed in the clients own product production facility and paid for by the client, and operated either by the client on a toll basis (likely), or by VRS on their behalf.

Best wishes - Spike

[grabster] 18/9/2019 07:58

Yeah but - do you seriously think that graphene development will be halted? (I'm not talking VRS - graphene in general).

The rules will change. Rules do. Ways will be found to redesignate or subdivide material classifications. Especially when global multinationals are involved.

[aquaesulis01] 18/9/2019 07:54

grabster, do some basic research on Reach before you spout off incorrect statements

The selling 'within the EU' restriction shouldn't be a problem if most of the company's production is for the wider non-EU world

Wrong

And presumably if UK is no longer in the EU, the UK production restriction won't apply?

Wrong

And whether UK is in or out of the EU, the EU will surely have to amend the limits for graphene, or get left behind in this revolution - as China storms ahead regardless (Versarien Beijing Technology Co Ltd included)

Yes and no

Why does it matter?

REACH is the strictest law to date regulating chemical substances and will affect industries throughout the world.

When REACH is fully in force, it will require all companies manufacturing or importing chemical substances into the European Union in quantities of one tonne or more per year to register these substances with a new European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki, Finland.

In essence, you have to have your graphene product covered by this regulation before you have a commercial product. European customers are unlikely to buy large quantities from you unless you can demonstrate compliance with REACH.

Does this affect my company even if I am not in Europe?

Yes. Similar regulations are already being developed in Korea, Turkey, and China; other countries are following and developing similar regulations to REACH.

Also, large multinational companies operate globally and tend to harmonize labeling and regulatory compliance to minimize duplication. By complying with REACH in Europe they will cascade the requirements throughout their organisations.