Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[smythe2] 29/7/2019 09:20

Rainbow your so funny!
What’s your investment strategy
BUY HIGH SELL LOW!!!
Lol

[superg1] 29/7/2019 09:18

Rainbow

A quick investor tip for you.

Pop into your local shop engage everyone and tell them that there is absolutely no chance of you, ever, ever, ever, going to win the lottery, then immediately buy a ticket.

When you do can you post the lucky dip numbers to me please (PRIVATELY)

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 09:11

###INFESTED BY TROLLS- IGNORE ####

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 09:11

Completely irrelevant

[bbmsionlypostafter] 29/7/2019 09:10

Tim,

You appear to be a deeply brainwashed cult member so asking you this question will likely generate another C&P of your usual post, but I'll ask anyway.


Why do you think superg deleted InvestmentGuru's post?

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 09:06

###INFESTED BY TROLLS- IGNORE ####

[bbmsionlypostafter] 29/7/2019 09:06

The elephant it the room that not a single cult member will acknowledge. No wonder superg deleted it lickety-split!

InvestmentGuru
18 Jul '19 - 11:53 - 73551 of 73552
0 1 0

I've just been reading through the Preliminary Results and have a question.

Revenue is shown as £9.14m.

Looking at the revenues apportioned to the various subsidiaries:

1) AAC Cyroma - £4.7m
2) Total Carbide - £3.2m
3) Versarien Technologies - £1.2m

That gives a total of £9.1m revenue. Am I therefore right in thinking that revenue from Graphene can only be £40,000 in total for the year?

[rainbow23] 29/7/2019 09:03

No Bo Jo effect on the share price today then. More hot air from the rampers.

[ch1rp] 29/7/2019 09:03

Well saidRiley. Great company great prospects. A winner for us holders...Meanwhile code 88 has been triggered. A BIG buyer in the background:)))

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 09:02

###INFESTED BY TROLLS- IGNORE ####

[nico115] 29/7/2019 09:02

Fair enoughThat's what make a market We've had some so called blinding RNS sYet we are only 128pI'm sceptical but happy if an wrong as I like the ceo and he deserves a lot of success and is v hard working and a decent fellaBUT I've seen it 9/10 where a ceo tweets non stop about his company being such good value and ends up falling over 50pctIf he was THAT confident he would let the announcements do the talking

[superg1] 29/7/2019 09:00

Re Frauds

I did at one point contact an AIM company that was about to be fitted up by another.

I did give them details of a guy that would show what they were being told was fiction.

I didn't hold positions in either. The talks news was in an RNS that's how I knew about it. I told the coney in talks to do some serious DD showing where they could get the info to show what was claimed was false.

Not long after news came, talks ended, no deal.

For me it's about research and getting to facts. Where I find fiction I report it. I spent 100's of hours on AGM reporting them, I didn't make a penny out of it, but a few PIs have appeared since saying they sold on the back of the detailed info. In that case it was well worth the effort.

The point for me is any company putting out false info are scumbags out to make money by fraud, worse still they fleece nice guys in the process.

Financial reward is not my interest re those, doing what is right is, to combat fraud and of course those scumbags.

I can make money by finding the good companies.

Anything I look at is treated as a fraud until I can prove otherwise.

Mike takes that view too. The fact is the vast majority of AIM companies are going to fail and leave investors with losses.

If you work hard you can reduce the risk of that significantly. This in theory those that have no logic make money on the AIM, because they are not following the masses.

If following the masses meant success then anyone investing on the AIM in the last 10 years should all be multi-millionaires by now.

[riley4] 29/7/2019 08:59

Some people can't see the woods for the trees?? in this case nico i think this applies to you.

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 08:59

###INFESTED BY TROLLS- IGNORE ####

[nico115] 29/7/2019 08:45

Look at revenues and look at market cap Something is majorly out of synchA ceo who tweets hourly is a ceo who is desperate to keep share price high and out of sync with reality This will halve and still be expensive Be careful

[nico115] 29/7/2019 08:43

Tim is a v well known ramper Buyer beware

[superg1] 29/7/2019 08:40

Mike did a great interview there.

Make no mistake any info Mike picked up on from reading this thread effectively becomes his research.

He has never once accepted anything said on here and in fact treated it all as BS junk.

He reviewed what was being posted and the the links then did his own thorough research which ended up with those stocko reports.

For me (as stated at the time) Mike arriving was like a breath of fresh air. Someone that throughly researches information and is a very intelligent guy with the ability to transfer the message in great detail to others.

He also comes up with host of strategy and business related questions that many of us wouldn't think of.

If certain others put the effort in then they would realise VRS is likely to become a very successful large company, hence the market cap is well ahead of it's figures, just like all promising AIM companies with backers, some are way more over-priced on that front than VRS.

However if you are lazy good for nothing, then what you do it target such companies with spurious allegations with personal attacks on the CEO or BOD, much easier as it requires little effort.

In time I hope Mike and others join together and the collective skills on research create less risk for investors on any given company.

I did note the comments about he found many companies he researched to be frauds, so do I. I just haven't mentioned them all along the way. If there is no one in them that I know there is no need to warn investors. It's is often a complete waste of time.

My first real warning came about Avanti and all these years on I still have the odd troll that appears from there. Never mind that it was spot on.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 29/7/2019 08:40

InvestmentGuru
18 Jul '19 - 11:53 - 73551 of 73552
0 1 0

Am I therefore right in thinking that revenue from Graphene can only be £40,000 in total for the year?

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 08:38

###INFESTED BY TROLLS- IGNORE ####

[riley4] 29/7/2019 08:38

I have been in since 19p and bought all the way up to 183p. So been through the ups and downs. Do a bit of research and you might realise you should buy some rather than advising not to.I don't post a lot but do read all the posts.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 29/7/2019 08:37

InvestmentGuru
18 Jul '19 - 11:53 - 73551 of 73552
0 1 0

I've just been reading through the Preliminary Results and have a question.

Revenue is shown as £9.14m.

Looking at the revenues apportioned to the various subsidiaries:

1) AAC Cyroma - £4.7m
2) Total Carbide - £3.2m
3) Versarien Technologies - £1.2m

That gives a total of £9.1m revenue. Am I therefore right in thinking that revenue from Graphene can only be £40,000 in total for the year?

[tim3416] 29/7/2019 08:37

###INFESTED BY TROLLS- IGNORE ####

[nico115] 29/7/2019 08:31

I don't post a lot but when I see retail buy on the back of hourly tweets by a CEO it worries me cos these buyers are being gullible Look at the mkt cap vs revenues and profits and months of promises For me this is dangerous Just saying be v careful what you read by any CEO..they all think their own company is the best thing since sliced bread but v few desperately tweet all day in the desperate hope of making buyers Be aware and be careful

[riley4] 29/7/2019 08:28

Post your short and show us how much you stand to lose. Idiot

[smallfry1] 29/7/2019 08:27

Nick

So you keep saying
So why are you wasting your time on here?
Very sad springs to mind.