Supply@me Capital Share Discussion Threads

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 16:05

Separately, in relation to ADVFN, as we have not received details of the underlying posters the subject of my complaints, we will be applying for Norwich Pharmacal orders concerning the worst offenders. A list of these posters will be published on this website later this week, so that they can have the opportunity to self identify via the "Contact Us" section of the website should they so wish. If they do not choose to do so and the Norwich Pharmacal orders do not result in providing sufficient information to identify who the posters are, then we will have demonstrated that we have taken all reasonable steps to identify the offenders. We will then issue proceedings against these particular individuals using their aliases in order to obtain judgement. If the defendants still choose not to attend court or identify themselves, then we will seek judgement by default. Having obtained judgement by default, we will then use exceptional measures to identify who these people are in order to enforce judgement. I would therefore recommend that the people concerned provide as much information about their identity as possible during this next stage of the process.

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 16:00

Firstly, the Court found "no difficulty" in holding that the Claimants were likely to succeed at trial on the evidence before it. Although the intervention of the Court was "rare" in these circumstances, the power to make such an Order existed and could be utilised. Injunctive relief was, exceptionally, appropriate until further order/trial. The Court found that the publication was clearly libellous and capable of causing serious harm. In particular, the learned Judge noted that the publication was likely to "unfairly undermine public trust and confidence in the Claimants and their businesses". Even though the publication had been removed prior to the hearing, the Court found that there still remained a real possibility that the website may be re-uploaded after the application hearing. 

[hodhasharon] 16/3/2021 15:54

Timbbeerrrrrr

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 14:36

1 not credit rating lower than CCCWhat's Symes credit rating since you know it?2. The inventories details and all transactions are stored securely and it is monitored

[hodhasharon] 16/3/2021 14:35

Extrader? I thought I was TW, Bacon, Knowing, VT, and Different World?

I have one alias, this one.

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 14:34

So your Extrader what a surprise

[hodhasharon] 16/3/2021 14:31

Your very own Ramper in Chief doesn't understand it:

1)

“They do not take on companies with a bad credit history.”

“This in turn would give them a better credit rating.”

2)

“but the company keeps the stock in their warehouse and can still sell the stock. ”

“SIA monetise the assets by tracking their movement and always make sure assets are there for the funder as collateral.”

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 14:26

Hod is that all you can up with....? Loads of companies have large MCAPS. It's Fintech remember something you don't understand and hence rubbish it..

[hodhasharon] 16/3/2021 14:18

"gasman1016 Mar '21 - 13:42 - 24317 of 24327

Hod they pay 16k upfront for due diligence. If they are not accepted tough.

So 165 x16k Hod

Can you do maths???

gasman1016 Mar '21 - 13:44 - 24318 of 24327

2.6 million"

You do realise that a 2.6 million argument doesn't justify the current grotesquely overpriced Cap don't you!

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 13:52

They are doing currently 30 customers a month.So 30 x 16k due diligence 480000 Euros per month..165 customers. 2640000 eurosThose accepted have 3 year contract fees payable every year can have a years extension

[slartybartfaster] 16/3/2021 13:51

Name the company that successfully sued. And court filings! You won't because you know and i know you have lied.

[professor_az] 16/3/2021 13:50

Only lier here is your dad for cheating on ur mum before u was born.No jog on

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 13:44

2.6 million

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 13:42

Hod they pay 16k upfront for due diligence. If they are not accepted tough.So 165 x16k HodCan you do maths???

[hodhasharon] 16/3/2021 13:40

Exclusive!

Gasman Exposes Her Lack of Understanding!

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 13:38

So 264000 quid in upfront fees..going to run out of money are we Tom. Lol...

[gasman10] 16/3/2021 13:11

In the month and a half of the suspension of the stock from the London Stock Exchange, Supply @ ME was not idle, it kept the business going and worked alongside the regulators to better explain its service model and, consequently, the its accounting structure: "we have communicated a lot in the past weeks, we have managed to get to know each other better and to provide the Financial Conduct Authority with the information requested: all in all, the stop to listing was useful", CEO Alessandro Zamboni told websim.it.The Italian fintech that allows companies to immediately obtain the value of the stock can be bought again from March 9: the stock closed on Friday at 0.50 pence, a price that is worth 162.7 million pounds. In the first four days of trading, the daily volumes were in the order of seven million pieces, but this summer it had reached almost two billion: a whirlwind of exchanges that allowed Supply @ ME to arrive on one of the stages of importance of the great world finance: "we have been in the reel of CNBC for a long time, together with the big names of Nasdaq", continues Zamboni.Such interest is probably justified by the prospects for success of his business, the monetization of the warehouse. Supply @ ME has succeeded in building a bridge on the void that is created when a company ends the production of its goods, or, in the case of a wholesaler, when the purchased goods arrive in its warehouse, and the moment in which the goods and merchandise are sold. In this period, companies often need liquidity, "a need that the traditional credit system serves only partially, with loans that arrive after a long time and are worth a maximum of 50% of the inventory value", explains Zamboni .Supply @ ME manages to quickly get the liquidity that companies need, using the resources made available by financial entities that have them in abundance and are desperate for profitable investment solutions.Building the tube that safely brings the liquidity of assets under management to companies has not been easy, in fact there have been technological, accounting, regulatory and logistical complexities that have taken more than five years to resolve. But all this is behind us, because today Supply @ ME is able to value a warehouse, proceed with its securitization with the issue of a short-medium term financial security that is underwritten by asset managers: the latter are happy because they have a return, companies meet their need at a fair price (not being a loan). The circle closes when the goods from the warehouse are sold to the end customer.Supply @ ME obtains commissions from all this: "on a warehouse worth 100 euros, we receive an income that is worth about 1.5 euros at the EBITDA level and one euro at the net result level", adds the number one of the group.To date, Supply @ ME has come to analyze 165 companies, with a total inventory of approximately two billion euros. On the basis of these numbers, it follows that the next income statement could also reach a net result of 20 million euros, if all the companies analyzed were considered eligible.These figures, however, are not seen, or are only partially seen, because it is as if we were in the year zero. Something will be evident at the end of the month or at the end of April, when the company will respectively provide a trading update and publish the 2020 financial statements, but the boom in revenues and profits should be seen this summer, with the publication of the accounts. in the first half of 2021. At this moment, at 0.50 pence, the stock is suffering a high "delivery risk", but it is also an investment opportunity for those who do not want to wait to see certified results.