Sirius Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[twentysixpointtwo] 03/6/2015 18:16

Perhaps it's your final top up MiniChris ??

[minichris] 03/6/2015 18:12

You could have sold earlier in the week for circa £20k more.Why sell at the lowest point or as close to as possible? Now a buy at the lowest point so far, that makes sense.

[cornishtrader1000] 03/6/2015 17:07

Someone needs £149,999 and a scratch card!! On a serious note i take your point. As i have belief in the BOD, these big trades make me think we are getting closer, making sure all shares are in the right hands so everyone is happy before the 2,3 or 4 killer RNS heading this way.

[minichris] 03/6/2015 16:51

Exactly Doc, who sells exactly £150k worth to the penny? And don't say someone who needs £150k......

[ropot] 03/6/2015 16:46

Who else just got their calculator out, lol?

[ropot] 03/6/2015 16:24

I guess I can make do with 30p.

[thundercat1] 03/6/2015 15:14

Why all the offloading if it's gonna hit double figures.. someone mentioned 30p I see over on lse earlier.

[ropot] 03/6/2015 14:12

Plan B sounds good... Keeps the cat in the bag if Calvert get them all, and then distribute some of them to others accordingly.

Otherwise they would have had to have announced lots of indivual interested parties in the share issue.

[the drewster] 03/6/2015 14:09

anything above 0.5p, and they can buy them back cheaper when they lend the next tranche, surely?

[oppl] 03/6/2015 13:57

Why would they want rid?

[the drewster] 03/6/2015 13:51

They may want rid of another 50m yet?????

[drrichard] 03/6/2015 13:46

We can but hope Drewster, and if so, does it clear the way for news at last?

[the drewster] 03/6/2015 13:41

they got 70,000,000 at 0.35 ... they may not want any more.

If it is them, their remaining 50+ million, cost an average of 0.1 as they got 150k for the near 20m sale

[htrocka2] 03/6/2015 13:39

If it was Calvert they've not played this very well....it looks as if the market are not going to let them back in again below the bid price.

[the drewster] 03/6/2015 13:33

will have been worked through for some days you'd imagine. No wonder all the buys didn't shift it. Calvert perhaps???

[htrocka2] 03/6/2015 13:21

19,354,838...interesting that they managed to trade such a large volume in one hit...and above the bid price too.

[dr rosso] 03/6/2015 12:53

Shareshifters. Well hello Jan K

[sherl0ck] 03/6/2015 12:19

RNS 1/5/15 stated that alternate funding of the Ororo subsid directly or at a project level was to be considered to avoid large dilution to the parent company. Now why would a funder consider doing this (which on the surface appears to be in our favour) as opposed to just taking hundreds of millions shares at sub 0.5p? I suspect the answer is that the funder is not your average disparate financier, they are more than likely linked with NewCo and could be initially awarded a share of the project as in a JV....and their return is cemented upon final takeover by NewCo.

[thundercat1] 03/6/2015 12:17

20m trade just appeared reason for drop ? Slip it in?

[htrocka2] 03/6/2015 11:58

'Africa, which in 2013 had half of the world’s 10 largest discoveries.'

makes me wonder if SRSP can add to this list?