We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serica Energy Plc | LSE:SQZ | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0CY5V57 | ORD USD0.10 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 130.30 | 130.80 | 131.50 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 632.64M | 102.98M | 0.2638 | 4.94 | 508.73M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
04/6/2024 14:59 | Grim times here | davethehorse | |
04/6/2024 14:48 | I too have been adding to this and a few other energy plays. I think given time these will re-rate unless there is something to which we are not privy. | yasx | |
04/6/2024 14:38 | Looks in freefall. I'm tempted, but the chart looks horrible. | pinemartin9 | |
04/6/2024 14:20 | I added some this afternoon. Seems to be getting out of hand. | nigelpm | |
04/6/2024 13:15 | A case of be careful what you wish for. | yasx | |
04/6/2024 12:59 | OilAl, Exactly my point - diversification is to move away from and reduce risk, not move towards and increase risk. It seemed a daft decision at the time (I did not hold shares back then), and so it has proven. | yasx | |
04/6/2024 12:49 | "The fault for this rests with SQZ as well - they failed to diversify when it was palpably clear to everyone that the UK Govt was causing havoc for NS players,"----------- | oilinvestoral | |
04/6/2024 12:41 | I'll be buying more with the divi | orchestralis | |
04/6/2024 09:41 | If Starmer simply said that we are not going to add to the Tory taxes on North sea, during the campaign this thing will jump. It is way to cheap and labour knows that any move that shutters jobs due to their higher taxes will not go down well. Hopefully common sense will prevail. | hunter154 | |
04/6/2024 09:33 | Nigel, Noted. | yasx | |
04/6/2024 08:17 | Chart awful here....not sure when next support is? | davethehorse | |
04/6/2024 08:12 | I know that yas. I was being tongue in cheek and simply suggesting it would be good. Clearly there are a series of limits and rules they need to follow. | nigelpm | |
04/6/2024 08:02 | Nigel, Buybacks (in practical terms) are not conducted by the Co. in this way - the broker has a pre-determined set of parameters according to which it makes purchases, rather than the Co. monitoring prices and loading up when prices are lower. | yasx | |
04/6/2024 08:01 | SQZ does appear very inexpensive on EV/2P and EV/Flowing Barrels at this level. Ex-Div for 14p soon and if it falls to that level it is a screaming BUY. New highly regarded CEO incoming to replace the third rate clown who was forced out and Labour fears overdone!!! | ashkv | |
04/6/2024 07:50 | It'll drop another 14-20p when it goes exdiv soon as well. | creditcrunchies | |
04/6/2024 07:46 | Share price reflects the fear of kier starmer being in charge! | slicethepie | |
04/6/2024 07:25 | Dire share price - a new 52 week low. Mitch Flegg's poisoned chalice post the debacle Tailwind Deal appears to have inflicted a fatal blow to SQZ's share price!!! SQZ now worth markedly less than what it paid for Tailwind around a year prior. Brent in the doldrums but UK Gas prices on an upswing... Dividend Yield now close to 14%!! :( SP-> 165.70p SQZ Current Share Price vs 52 Week low of 165.7p on 4 June 24-> 0.00% SQZ Current Share Price vs 52 Week High of 271p on 18 Sep 23-> -38.86% Brent-> $77.30 British Gas Prices (Next Month)-> £87.50 Shares Outstanding-> 393,468,408 GBPUSD-> 1.280 MarketCap GBP-> £651,977,152 MarketCap USD-> $834,530,755 Cash GBP [Including GBP27.5mn of Decom security deposit reimbursed in 2024] per FY 2023 Results-> £291,000,000 Cash USD (31 Dec 23)-> $372,480,000 Debt (GBP) (31 Dec 23)-> £213,000,000 Debt (USD) (31 Dec 23)-> $272,640,000 NET CASH (USD) (31 Dec 23)-> $99,840,000 NET CASH % of SP/Market Cap-> 11.96% Net Cash Component of SQZ Share Price-> 19.82p Enterprise Value (In USD)-> $734,690,755 2024 Mid-Guidance Production [2024 Guidance 41-48kbpd]-> 43,000 SQZ YTD Production [1 Jan to/Including 14 Apr 24]-> 45,400 Production Actual 2023 [Guidance 2023 Mid-Point (40-45kbpd)]-> 40,121 Enterprise Value/Barrel 2024 Mid-Guidance Production [2024 Guidance 41-48kbpd]-> $17,086 EV/Barrel SQZ YTD Production [1 Jan to/Including 14 Apr 24]-> $16,183 EV/Barrel Actual Average 2023 Production-> $18,312 Decommissioning Provision (Per FY 23 Results)-> $149,158,400 EV/Barrel Mid-Guidance 2024 Production including Decommissioning Provision-> $20,555 (9p+14p) 2023 Full Year Expected Dividend Yield-> 13.88% SQZ + Tailwind 2P Reserves as of 31 Dec 23-> 140,000,000 SQZ Combined Enterprise Value/2P Reserves-> $5.25 | ashkv | |
04/6/2024 07:12 | Buyback needs to be very aggressive today. Forget fiddling around with 100k here and there. Put an order in for 5m at 170p and let it fill. | nigelpm | |
03/6/2024 14:22 | The fault for this rests with SQZ as well - they failed to diversify when it was palpably clear to everyone that the UK Govt was causing havoc for NS players, with Labour undoubtedly set to make matters worse - it has been known to anyone with more than a single brain cell that Labour were certain to lead the country at some point in 2024. A poor acquisition (in the context of what they could have had elsewhere) and now searching for acquisitions has led to a situation in which the shares are drifting with any periodic bounce sold into. | yasx | |
03/6/2024 13:34 | All roads appear to lead to Davos...That Labour will not define what they intend to do about Capex investment allowances has just about brought the North Sea to a standstill....Nothin | sawney | |
03/6/2024 12:38 | And if by magic a slight softening in Labour's rhetoric. | mickinvest | |
03/6/2024 09:39 | Irrelevant from a practical perspective. SNP and Tories likely to be shouting from the sidelines but that's not going to change it. | nigelpm | |
03/6/2024 08:20 | Its certainly not wholly irrelevant unless you are only looking at it from the election angle Nigel. There is nobody fighting the O&G corner apart from the Unite union so to get one of the major political parties onboard makes a huge difference as we can at least get some vocal argument to Labour's madness. Gas up 7% this morning, not doing much for the shares though | mickinvest |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions