We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scotgold Resources Limited | LSE:SGZ | London | Ordinary Share | AU000XINEAK5 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 13.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
29/10/2019 08:17 | Nice one kcowe. Welcome aboard 👍 | glenalmond | |
29/10/2019 08:15 | 30 more from the faucet, Steelers | glenalmond | |
29/10/2019 06:31 | Good work, glenalmond, filtering me instead of countering my evidenced revelation that there are no gold nuggets at Cononish. Aren't you concerned that noobs will believe me since your only rebuttal has been to call me a liar? Btw, what are the chances that Scotgold are about to raise a lot more equity finance, ostensibly to fund exploration in the new license areas? You heard it here first. | pr100 | |
29/10/2019 06:17 | only true gold mine in uk ...... will trade at a premium to other gold mines just because it is scottish .... thus unique , my pension fund has been happy purchacing stock in the last couple of months . | kcowe | |
29/10/2019 03:47 | Scotgold Resources Limited's (LON:SGZ) Richard Gray speaks to Proactive London's Andrew Scott following the news they've restructured their mining permits in the Grampian region of Scotland. The amount of land covered by the permits reduces to about 2,900sq km from 4,000sq km but Gray says the arrangement has the benefit of new 6-year terms for the permits. 4.5 minute interview. Remove the space - investors.co.uk/comp - or YouTube | glenalmond | |
29/10/2019 03:46 | Scotgold Resources Limited's (LON:SGZ) Richard Gray speaks to Proactive London's Andrew Scott following the news they've restructured their mining permits in the Grampian region of Scotland. The amount of land covered by the permits reduces to about 2,900sq km from 4,000sq km but Gray says the arrangement has the benefit of new 6-year terms for the permits. 4.5 minute interview. Remove the space - investors.co.uk/comp - or YouTube | glenalmond | |
29/10/2019 03:24 | Time to clean out the filth ... pr100 28 Oct '19 - 09:17 - 244 of 245 (Filtered) That's better. What a dopey lying tw@t that bloke was, lol. Good riddance … again! | glenalmond | |
28/10/2019 10:50 | Chart looks compelling , lovely bull flag . | kcowe | |
28/10/2019 10:45 | Would be good to see this break 83. Been very healthy recently. | johny cash | |
28/10/2019 09:17 | Scotgold have been looking for finance ever since the BFS was published. They want you to think they are no longer looking but it's a racing certainty that they are. So many chances to excite the capital markets with the discovery of nuggets - and yet none taken. Hard to explain - unless there aren't any nuggets innit? Time to grow up and start using your brain, wee Graham. | pr100 | |
28/10/2019 08:48 | Ask David Lenigas , lol , True colours being shown there old Chap man Point being !,lol , Scotgold aren't desperate for finance you idiot regards of what you may say or read in THE SUN , lol Quote " The things obviously exist " lol at you | vfb1888 | |
28/10/2019 06:41 | The stock market regulator couldn't care less what is said at any 'off-market' venue - and doesn't read geo-technical PDFs linked from corporate websites. The point is that no claims of nuggets are being made by Scotgold in regulated channels and you should really be asking yourself: Why not? Any goldminer desperate for financing would be shouting "nuggets!" from the rooftops: just ask David Lenigas. And why no update to the particle size in the mineralogical reports in the various feasibility and corporate presentations produced by the company over the past couple of years? The answer is obvious and simple: there have been no verified nuggets found at Cononish. How else would you like to explain it? | pr100 | |
27/10/2019 23:32 | The "THINGS" obviously exist its just that you haven't seen them or the SUN , lol , hasn't written about them since 2011 ! Ohh and they just happen to be on exhibit but you don't know where and then there's the company website . What a plonker you are | vfb1888 | |
27/10/2019 22:49 | The thing obviously exists: it just isn't what you think it is. And that is confirmed by all the CPRs, feasibility studies, mineralogical reports and company presentations to date - and a number of articles including the one you mention. What is missing is any company announcement or article or mineralogical report or CPR confirming that there are now nuggets at Cononish. (For the obvious reason that there are, sadly, no nuggets.) I'm sure the penny will drop in a minute. | pr100 | |
27/10/2019 22:04 | Having seen and held those things that you claim don't exist I find you pathetically comical but that's hardly surprising given that your view is based on an article from 8 years ago in a comic strip rag that used to pay your wages. | vfb1888 | |
27/10/2019 21:04 | You're obviously disappointed about there being no nuggets at Cononish but that doesn't mean they won't produce some gold. There, there. | pr100 | |
27/10/2019 19:40 | Truth hurst old chapman ! PROVEN LIAR | vfb1888 | |
27/10/2019 19:34 | :-)) It's almost like you're auditioning to be the organ grinder's monkey. Good boy. | pr100 | |
27/10/2019 18:22 | Since you clearly have nothing to say about the facts of this matter, your best bet would be to zip it since your juvenile squawking would put anyone off investing in Scotgold - especially if they knew that you were the biggest mug punter invested here. I'm surprised the more grown-up members of your clique don't tell you that you are harming the cause and scaring other punters away. Also, when confronted by proof that there are no nuggets at Cononish, you need to suck it up instead of abusing the messenger. But hey, you're on a mission to make yourself look like a complete dope so you won't be listening to any advice from me. But talk to your chums. Or the family. Anyone you trust, really. In case it helps, I really enjoy seeing you make a fool of yourself. | pr100 | |
27/10/2019 17:06 | Oh Simon your card is marked and everyone knows exactly what and who you are. You are the only virtual one around , scared old keyboard warrior & PROVEN LIAR | vfb1888 | |
27/10/2019 14:27 | [Yawn]. I refer you to post 164: "shylock (LSE) pr100 (ADVFN) Duck & Dive (iii etc) You're the only saddo who cares, wee Graham :) And you and your virtual mates are still officially the worst detectives in the world." | pr100 | |
27/10/2019 14:13 | Thanks for confirming whom you are yet again . PROVEN LIAR | vfb1888 | |
27/10/2019 13:44 | AIUI, Shylock wrote to Gray demanding some disclosures and threatening to report him to the regulators if he didn't comply. Shortly thereafter, Scotgold threatened legal action against LSE if they didn't ban Shylock…and, sadly, that always works. Shylock never lied. He told inconvenient truths. Speaking of which, nothing I have written in this thread is invented. I have pointed you to the facts which disprove the existence of nuggets at Cononish and you choose to ignore them. Resorting to playground accusations rather than dealing with the facts is childish and wins no arguments except with other schoolkids. | pr100 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions