Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Hldgs LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 9.15p 20,200 08:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
8.80p 9.50p 9.15p 9.15p 9.15p
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology -4.94 -1.34 35.5

Scancell Hldgs (SCLP) Latest News

More Scancell Hldgs News
Scancell Hldgs Takeover Rumours

Scancell Hldgs (SCLP) Share Charts

1 Year Scancell Hldgs Chart

1 Year Scancell Hldgs Chart

1 Month Scancell Hldgs Chart

1 Month Scancell Hldgs Chart

Intraday Scancell Hldgs Chart

Intraday Scancell Hldgs Chart

Scancell Hldgs (SCLP) Discussions and Chat

Scancell Hldgs Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
13/11/201814:17Using immunology to fight cancer.18,545
09/10/201812:29Could this be the end of cancer?763
20/5/201816:25Scancell short thread2
16/8/201407:47Using immunology to fight cancer (LTH W/O Rose Tints - Free Speech Thread)161

Add a New Thread

Scancell Hldgs (SCLP) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Scancell Hldgs trades in real-time

Scancell Hldgs (SCLP) Top Chat Posts

Scancell Hldgs Daily Update: Scancell Hldgs is listed in the Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell Hldgs was 9.15p.
Scancell Hldgs has a 4 week average price of 7p and a 12 week average price of 7p.
The 1 year high share price is 19.25p while the 1 year low share price is currently 7p.
There are currently 387,796,556 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 167,182 shares. The market capitalisation of Scancell Hldgs is £35,483,384.87.
tosh123: WW, believe what you want. Having been in this share for well over 7 years ( probably closer to 8 years actually ) and having seen the full spectrum of share price movement, myself and Loz will definitely not be the only ones to have traded the share. There will be a lot of people who took advantage of certain shifts in sentiment and share price.
panama7: Wigwammer, you just don't get it, in no way should the share price be at the level of 8p requiring. It is at that level because the BOD have failed to live up to anything they have stated to Investors for the last 6 years. They have failed to support the share price at any level. If Goodfellow the then CEO states at 34p he is going to sell the Company for many multiples than any share price below that price is a failure by the BOD. I guess yo were the one yesterday running around getting biscuits and coffee for the BOD and holding the door when they needed a leak.
tosh123: This is brilliant... " The problem with ""project Fear"" is, the smart folks see through it, and still vote to buy the share. Absolutely bonkers.... the smart folk see through it, and still vote to buy !!! no they don't ! the share price has continually collapsed, so the smart folk sold a long time ago, when the share price was in the 30's, meanwhile, the village idiot Ineptico was still buying, and telling others to do the same ! Smart ? I dont think so ! What a total plank.
panama7: ONW, spot on again, rewards for failure seem to be the norm in this Country now. There is absolutely no correlation between the Share price performance and everything that has emanated from the BOD over the course of 6 years. We have been told for 6 years that there is " SIGNIFICANT INTEREST " being shown in both platforms yet they have had to raise funds at half the price of 5 years ago. If you genuinely had " SIGNIFICAN INTEREST ! in your science you would not be having to raise funds at heavily discounted levels and at the lowest share price for 5 years. Quite simply they have lied and their lies have finally caught up with them.
panama7: Tosh, I am no fan of Inane but he isn't the problem and if people have bought shares based on his idiotic posts more fool them. The BOD are solely responsible for yet more lies, only a few weeks ago Glencross tweeted that he had spoken to Holloway and was reassured that everything was on track for the trial to commence this year. We have heard Holloway state everything on track several times when obviously he has blatantly lied and lied even to their largest shareholders. We now know why KCB resigned , she was obviously aghast at the astronomical pay rises been dished out over the last few years when the BOD have done everything in their power to decimate the share price so that they can pick up ever cheaper shares and options. I have stated for ages that they have lied to and misled Investors ever since Goodfellow's Frankfurt video. There is a whole litany of lies and untruths , they are quite simply an absolute disgrace and the share price performance is a very accurate reflection of their performance and their lies. We have been told for 6 years there is significant interest in both platforms by large Pharma, yet not one single deal has been forthcoming and if there was significant interest then there is no way funds would have been raised at the discounted levels we have had to endure , it is a total contradiction and yet proof of more lies. Can't wait for the AGM and the BOD to justify their performance , their salaries and in particular Goodfellow's 100k pay rise in the year he steps down. Quite simply a BOD and individuals who are nothing short of a disgrace.
tosh123: Torquay, none of the above justifies the 100% failure to deliver anything on time, and indeed even more significantly, failure to deliver many things at all. There have been numerous occasions where we have been told that its a " pivotal year " and that deals will be done, yet here we are some 6 - 7 years later, with a distressed share price, numerous dilutions, and potentially still looking at another 18 months to 2 years, before we may see any major shift in the share price. Whilst i appreciate the world of baby bio's is always evolving, this is Scancells core business, and as such, they should know their market. Delays are inevitable especially when you're talking about in depth trials, however, just for once it would be nice to see a realistic time frame announced, followed by an EARLY , or at least, on time, delivery. That said, as you rightly point out, the big buy back on all of the above, is the retention of all the IP, however, that IP is only really worth substantial money once the concepts behind the IP have been proven and verified, which we are still some way off, hence the 18 month - 2 years, before IMHO , we see any share price movement ABOVE the existing highs of a few years ago. Managed badly ???? Yes i think so, very badly. But im still here, and so are many other LTH's, so we all have faith, even if that faith is of varying magnitudes.
torquayfan: P7. Developing pre-clinical science and initiating clinical trials is a little different from say, building a house or making widgets - Scancell as a Biotech are surely not alone in setting targets which are then hard to attain. I daresay that BoD have met a few timescales but you go trawling for them if you have time. I mentioned the problem of ''managing a bundle of ever expanding and increasingly patented science with a tiny Team'' and I think it a fair point, particularly given the depth and range of Scancell's science portfolio! If all Scancell had now was SCIB1 for example - I'm guessing we'd be further along but that'd be on a much smaller path ? As for BoD supporting the share price - their main business is to take the science through the 'maze' to commercialisation in some way - it's not proving easy with limited resources but Scancell ARE getting there. Just look what's on board now ! Of course, BoD HAVE tried in many ways to support the share price - but this is Biotech UK and this it is the way it is. Hard going. But at least the IP has so far been retained. What Scancell have put together is a truly amazing achievement and well done the BoD - the share price will zoom in due course. Of that I am certain. ATB
panama7: RH, the share price is consolidating at 14p, the share price was 34p when Goodfellow released his video, the BOD should have been ethically and morally obligated to keep the share price above that price. they have left those unfortunate Investors out of pocket for 5 years and counting and have shown by their words , actions and deeds they couldn't care less about their PI's.
drdobson1: ONW-Personally thought what a great post. I have been thinking along same lines re Inanaco.Is he a lot cleverer than I have given him credit for. Create the impression of being a long term holder but all the time is he has been trading SCLP-probably only revealed when his ego could not cope with the beating it was taking from the declining share price and he thought I have to be seen as a much better investor/trader than the ASTUTE. On the VAL board he was called a shorter and that he and C7 were part of a boiler room crew.Well I thought that a load of nonsense but perhaps he is a secret trader as you say that stock is a lot more volatile than here. Good traders are often perceived as being devious and only out for themselves and he certainly fits that bill By portraying himself as a self taught science guru he has sought to distract from his game plan which is to destroy investor sentiment and cause maximum bulletin board disharmony. He probably wants to get the SCLP share price to fall so he can buy and trade in fact he may not have much of a holding at all. He is as cunning as a cartload of monkeys and slippery as an eel and has me totally fooled or am I being too kind t9 him. Anyway all have a happy new year
inanaco: ""if you make a statement that i cannot reason against then your statement becomes the lead policy which i then support "" yes because most of the intense discussion are on the science that impact IP value """There are plenty. Here's just one: share price down from 60p to 12p. Isn't that a negative? I make it negative 48p."""" That's sentiment has the science stood still in all that time, ? ""the Shareprice is not relevant as all i am trying to show is it's cheap relative to the IP.<<br /> Two fatal flaws in one sentence: 1) How on earth can you say the share price isn't relevant??!! It is very relevant if you have invested and need to sell.""" You have now added a third party ie somebody that needs to sell, that is not my position. """It is relevant to how easy it is for SCLP to raise new funds and at what price those funds are raised and therefore relevant to the amount of dilution of our investment.""" Very true, But like you have done, you can then look at the shares in issue and assess the likely outcome of capital growth based on the resultant influx of cash and how the science develops from that Dilution so has a result on both sides of the equation Ie A bigger increase in capital growth than was forecast without that expenditure. """ all i am trying to show is it's cheap relative to the IP.<<br /> Well you haven't! """ I have but maybe you have not understood the years of comparing and understanding of the science of others with wildforce allowed us to pretty well place Scancell into the market place and place reasoned value to the IP """" lozan/Tosh, Mr W cannot explain why the IP has a lower value to the share price <<br /> The IP has a lower value to the SP? Are you saying the IP is not worth 12p? """ actually the buying of the share by Loz at 47p and selling at 53p would indicate Loz buying at the level was cheap and selling at 53p produced a true value event. to then argue its only worth 12p with that evidence would be difficult ... but Loz would have to show comparative value to the IP .. being 12p .. which i suspect would be impossible """not a point worth discussing as No conclusion will be ever drawn from it as its not linked to IP only market sentiment on any particular day ...<<br /> You have a point, why worry about a share price of 12.3 when it could easily be 12.5 tomorrow."" I am not worried about the share price, i already feel the value way exceeds this level, and indeed the Board of Scancell accept that, hence they want to raise the big amounts not based on share price but IP .. however they will always have the fall back position of market priced cash raising which again is Not Ip priced cash raising like a deal """thus all the posts can be dismissed as not relevant, <<br /> In YOUR opinion, which here does not command a very high level of respect"""" then show me posts that you feel are of High Value that i have missed, like i said I debate for my own investment position ..I defend Scancell because I am invested not because your invested,
Scancell Hldgs share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
add chat code
Your Recent History
Gulf Keyst..
FTSE 100
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:42 V: D:20181113 21:59:23