We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.475 | 5.05% | 9.875 | 9.50 | 10.25 | 9.875 | 9.09 | 9.40 | 762,868 | 09:00:24 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.65 | 91.58M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
11/3/2019 14:30 | Of course I like many others understand Knowlesi posts. He says the BOD are not aligned with SH with little skin in game.Apart from JC which member has dipped their hands in their own pocket. He says they will need to raise at some point.Well again unless there is a deal announced soon that is very likely. Let us hope some announcement comes before the cash runs out hopefully the trials starting. Why not debate with Knowlesi if you are confident of your own argument.It appears that you try and stifle any alternative debate by either hiding behind the “ complex science” or trawling historic posts putting them in quotation marks and then make some oblique reference to something only you seem to comprehend. The judging of any debate is at the behest of the observers whether in an official or unofficial capacity not the participants so the outcome cannot be decided upon by the people having a debate. To avoid being called a hypocrite I am sure your overwhelming support of the democratic process as demonstrated in the Brexit Vote should be consistent with the view that both the SP( more sellers than buyers) and you losing the argument with Knowlesi( more people agreeing with him than you) ably demonstrates your track record as being unproven,unsuccessfu | ivyspivey | |
11/3/2019 14:22 | Inanaco, 1) I didn't say I didn't understand - I asked you what you meant so that you would expand on your point. Since you ask why, I'll be blunt - I think it's hard to make any sense of some of your posts and the points you are trying to make are unclear. 2) What's wrong with being speculative? You seem happy to allow speculation all day long on the science and potential deals and yet for some reason won't discuss anything else. 3) I really don't want or need you to thread generate and yes am very happy to discuss Scancell with any of the names you mention. 4) Has it crossed your mind that nobody will discuss Knowlesi's posts because they agreed with him? | bermudashorts | |
11/3/2019 14:17 | His ego knows no bounds. Everyone knows that Knowlesi and Ivy are correct.. No debate required. Loz... you made me laugh. Can i have a go , I spy with my little eye, something beginning with L. | tosh123 | |
11/3/2019 14:06 | lol then why not offer that information rather than posting you did not understand when actually you did .. the reason why i won't discuss some topics is because anything that moves off the science becomes speculative funding etc .. Knowlesi has just proved that nobody will discuss his posts constructively indeed all it does is bring out Obnoxious posters like Moljen and Tosh .. even Ivy's attempt was at best naive or at worse demonstrating stupidity And lets be honest here Bermuda do you feel you could get any sensible discussion out of them ? No which is why you want me to Thread Generate | inanaco | |
11/3/2019 13:58 | Very helpful response. You seem reluctant to discuss most topics unless connected with the science and so my question was an attempt to move the conversation on and to actually discuss something Scancell related. I assume you're drawing some sort of parallel with how quickly the Moditope trial will produce results and I was actually going to go on to add another perspective to that. Forget it. | bermudashorts | |
11/3/2019 13:38 | why don't you explain what you think it means ? | inanaco | |
11/3/2019 13:36 | Inanaco, Re. your post on Tecentriq, what do you mean when you say:- 'which again highlights the speed of the trials to gain significant data from the Modi1 trials "pfs 7.4 months' | bermudashorts | |
11/3/2019 13:27 | Moljen, the flat earth society are probably a bit more balanced that the resident village idiot. | tosh123 | |
11/3/2019 13:26 | I take as much notice of his posts nowadays as I do to pronouncements made by The Flat Earth Society | moljen | |
11/3/2019 13:23 | out comes Freebies with an average Mr "holding for a Deal" "i won't sell under any circumstance" lol | inanaco | |
11/3/2019 13:19 | Moljen, please take some friendly advice and just ignore the idiot, no matter what PROOF you have, it will not get absorbed by the clown, and he will just LIE to get himself out of a corner , and then waffle on about a subject that has nothing to do with what was being discussed. The oaf remains totally delusional. Dont encourage him, he is poison. | tosh123 | |
11/3/2019 13:09 | Moljen Knowlesi Forecasts listed below ............. """"if the trials are succcessful then name your share price, it will fly through the pounds. The trial timelines will show results mid 2020""" """" Now it doesnt mean i dont believe the share price is undervalued at current levels - it is hugely undervalued, """ """" Take advantage of weakness, buy for the long term - its a 2-3 year play -"""" | inanaco | |
11/3/2019 13:08 | Moljen sell then .. or are you holding for the deals that Knowlesi has described | inanaco | |
11/3/2019 13:07 | It's not a debate ... nobody is discussing with Knowlesi .. Nobody is actually interested """""""""" references to past posts which no one else understands."""""""" are you saying that you understand the current knowlesi posts ?? but not his previous past posts ? you make no sense Ivy .. | inanaco | |
11/3/2019 13:03 | Silent majority recommender here | moljen | |
11/3/2019 12:58 | Yes P7.Most people waiting for news before dipping back in for more. I am happy to buy at these levels in that I am reasonably confident longer term but no point while it continues to drift. See Knowlesi on other place is making fair points but again rather than try and debate with him which is case on here he is sadly attacked with inane references to past posts which no one else understands. That is huge difference between the 2 boards.Whilst there are some good posters there you can see from the number of recommends that Knowlesi gets it is the silent majority rather than the usual suspects who only want to stifle any debate. | ivyspivey | |
11/3/2019 10:56 | Too many 'imponderables' = Stagnation The [unanswered} 'question' of where those 5 mil shares went / are ... Only adds to the 'imponderables' = Stagnation | the real lozan | |
11/3/2019 10:31 | Tosh, they have let him down, he is just too deluded to admit it. | panama7 | |
11/3/2019 10:27 | Panama, nearly everyone..... | tosh123 | |
11/3/2019 10:13 | Tosh, I don't think there will be many buyers until the IND is approved, this BOD have let their Investors down so many times that no one will trust them until something concrete is in place. | panama7 | |
11/3/2019 09:15 | 6p being threatened again. Gazza, same here. | tosh123 | |
11/3/2019 09:04 | BoB - RDV = rendezvous... arangements for the week ahead {Quite a lot of them actually} P S Now we are 'retired'... I ask myself = How did we 'fit things in'... before ??? | the real lozan | |
11/3/2019 08:55 | Lozan - RDV? | bermudashorts |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions