We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.05 | 0.55% | 9.15 | 8.80 | 9.50 | 9.15 | 8.86 | 9.10 | 1,054,095 | 12:15:26 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.09 | 84.9M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/3/2019 15:29 | anyway Tosh Holding shares for a deal ONW holding shares for a deal game over | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 15:28 | Tosh ONW has advised you to give up on it as your are on thin ice ..... | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 15:27 | ONW on the contrary .. your core Holding ? .. puts you into the same camp .. thin ice ? LOL | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 15:26 | Tosh, I see there's more attempts to muddy the waters now. So damned predictable. Pointless posting further on that one I'd say. LOL ATB | oldnotwise | |
06/3/2019 15:23 | Tosh ... why are you so convinced i am sitting on enormous losses ? and really you should think a bit harder about the mouse data on SCIB1 .. perhaps bermuda can explain the importance of the original SCIB1 data in the mouse being proved to translate into human and the effects on the reliability of replicating that by adding a murine PD-1 which has also proved reliable in transferring to human data | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 15:23 | Thanks Bermuda, lets hope so, but the run's on for CF now... not ideal. ATB | oldnotwise | |
06/3/2019 15:21 | Berm, everyone wants to see an orderly unwind of their positions, so hopefully there will be an exit plan that doesn't hurt the markets too much. ineptico.... please try to stay on topic and stop lying. | tosh123 | |
06/3/2019 15:21 | Inanaco No, you don't get away with that. The point under discussion was your ability to predict against YOUR IMPOSED 50/50 chance for Tosh. The question of the Deal is (as Bermuda also points out) an irrelevancy dragged in by you to muddy the waters. Your Predictions of the share price have been Completely Incorrect whereas Tosh has demonstrated an ability to predict which is vastly superior to yours and beats not only your completely failed efforts but also the 50/50 rule you imposed on him. Sorry Inanaco but you've failed even the test you set for someone else, so please stop banging on about waiting for a deal. IN that connection incidentally, you may have noticed that for many the illusive deal has moved from almost a dead cert to a good chance (Rabbits in hats etc). Be careful Inanaco, the ice upon which you attempt to base your fallacious argument is getting thinner bwith each post you make. AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
06/3/2019 15:18 | On the contrary, its of great interest to those who dont want to be sitting on massive losses like you. As for losing the mouse debate, you cant say that... no one can... the trials haven't even started yet, and im not saying that it WILL fail, im saying that until it is proven, it could fail... again another LIE... Honestly, what is the matter with you. | tosh123 | |
06/3/2019 15:16 | Following our discussions at the weekend re. City Financial and orderly markets (see my 20096), it looks like City Financial have suspended dealing on the Absolute Equity Fund due to a run of client redemptions. So no more sells for the time being. | bermudashorts | |
06/3/2019 15:11 | ONW ... "Yes, I hold a core holding BUT I can now (if I wish reinvest from past profits) at a level which is far better than you probably average "" yes you have a core holding ... so i assume you are waiting a deal .. ? LOL the rest of the details relate to your personal preference of how you got there .. which really is of no interest | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 15:04 | Tosh .. you are correct ... however the Mouse SCIB1 data did translate to Huaman you cannot now say that it did not ... or it might not which is why you lost that one | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 14:59 | Ive not ignored the mouse data ! Yet more lies, and once again you make stuff up to try and suit your agenda.... What is wrong with you ? What i have said quite clearly is that mouse data DOES NOT always directly transfer to the same data / results in human trials... FACT... that is not ignoring it, it is the complete opposite, its acknowledging it.... Now stop lying. and try to stay on topic. Funding required, very soon ( not tomorrow )... unless the fluffy white bunny appears. | tosh123 | |
06/3/2019 14:54 | Inanaco ACTUALLY,No you're not correct. Tosh is predicting (Or hoping for) a deal, but I don't believe He or I have ever said anything different. Where he and I differ from you is simple. We have stated that the share price does not go in a straight line and other more short term issues can get in the way. YOU however have always spouted the MANTRA that the share price doesn't matter... Well to those who want to preserve their capital it does, consequently many have departed from your philsophy (when it suits that is) of buying... All in becausre there's no risk etc. and holding. There IS a risk, and that is that things don't go to plan. Those who have decided that maybe things won't go to plan (and there's plenty of signals to suggest that over the years) and have taken some profits are now in a better overall position (and have been proved to be correct (against a 50/50 chance according to you). Yes, I hold a core holding BUT I can now (if I wish reinvest from past profits) at a level which is far better than you probably average, and still end up with as great(if not greater) holding than you, with the proportionate end of game profit. However you look at it (and I've incorporated you distraction of "waiting for a deal" ) since we were discussing PREDICTIONS, yours are 100% WRONG and Tosh's are 100% CORRECT against a 50/50 chance (according to you). I don't think your record's particularly good in that context, Do you? AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
06/3/2019 14:36 | ONW you are holding for a deal ... is that correct ? Tosh is holding for a deal ""Yep... of course im holding for the possibility of a deal, ive never said anything different,SO IS EVERYONE you idiot """" Proven I am predicting the value to the share of deals how can i be wrong and tosh be right ... when we are both Holding for deals .....which we accept will be high if the data from the mouse (ignored by tosh) is proved correct | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 14:33 | BTW Inanaco, I KNOW Why you've failed to be correct over 7YEARS, but before explaining that I can't wait to see your defence... ATB | oldnotwise | |
06/3/2019 14:30 | Inanaco I've just read a very interesting statement from you. You've said that, "when people like Tosh predict a movement down .. what they are not doing is predicting why it will move down ... Indeed Tosh has just posted as such .. "history" it's just pure guesswork as he has a 50/50 chance of being Right" So, Inanaco, If guesswork has a 50/50 chance of being right, it seems to me that your own particular "Predictions" for the share price since 2012 have always been for the share price to be higher than it was at the time of your posting those "Predictions". Thus Tosh is 100% right (against your comment) of only a 50/50 chance, whilst you're 100% wrong against the same measure. So if as you say a prediction from Tosh suggests a movement down even if I give YOU the benefit of the doubt how can it be that if you've been calling the share price higher ever since the infamous 64p peak in Scancell's price in 2012 how on earth can Tosh be 100% correct (Since we're almost at an all time low), yet You're 100% INCORRECT? However you look at it you must comcede that Tosh must have something to be so diametrically right against your complete failure to correctly predict the share pruce over a seven year period. How do you explain Tosh's SUCCESS against your FAILURE over such a long period (seven years)? I'm amazed that you've failed so dismally to be correct in your predictions. Seems you owe Tosh a large apology. AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
06/3/2019 14:29 | you have a different strategy of holding for a deal ... so why have you not got that right ? | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 14:28 | ineptico.... " i would say it's simple myself ... we moved to 6p because of a 5m share movement ". But it had already hit the 6p mark once BEFORE the City revelation and BEFORE the 5 mill... It went into the 6p territory over a month ago, so once again, your theory is fundamentally flawed. | tosh123 | |
06/3/2019 14:26 | Tosh "" Also, predicting that the SP, would move from 12p to 6p ( as many of us did )"" but you did not sell .... !! you have a different strategy of holding for a deal ... so why have you not got that right ? | inanaco | |
06/3/2019 14:19 | Again you try to move the debate away from the actual question, but hey ho, nothing new there, but just for clarity, tossing a coin when investing is not an option. Furthermore, the law of averages say that if that was to be the case then YOU would have been right 50% of the time, which as everyone knows, you aren't, in fact you're wrong 100% of the time. Also, predicting that the SP, would move from 12p to 6p ( as many of us did ) is not a 50/50, its very specific, and, as it came to fruition despite your shouts to the contrary, its also very accurate... It also had reasoning behind it, its just that your head is buried too far up your own passage to understand what was written I don't know of any coin toss that can be so accurate.... so your argument, once again, doesn't hold any water. Now please try to keep on topic. And as others have already said, NOBODY mentioned anything about funding being required tomorrow, on the contrary, late Spring / early Summer was very clearly posted, so dont try to change the question to suit your own very flawed stance. | tosh123 | |
06/3/2019 14:19 | Panama7 ... if you had the answer already ... why did you not sell at 60p .. ? from memory you had 600,000 shares why are you still here moaning about YOUR decision to HOLD ?? it's not my fault !! that you have made the same posts on the BOD for the last 3 years .. why have you NOT sold ?? | inanaco |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions