ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

9.55
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 08:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 9.55 9.30 9.80 9.55 9.55 9.55 5,112 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 5.27M -11.94M -0.0129 -7.40 88.61M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 9.55p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 7.65p to 18.125p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £88.61 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -7.40.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 19251 to 19275 of 66150 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  774  773  772  771  770  769  768  767  766  765  764  763  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
05/2/2019
09:03
VAL LOOKING GOOD TODAY.
412069
05/2/2019
09:02
The trHYPE driven BUY, BUY, BUY SCAM tombstone -
The epitaph reads = "We were MINTED"

the real lozan
05/2/2019
08:44
Morning ONW,
Find your posts refreshingly informative which has been the standard set by this Bullitin board recently with far higher contributions that MFFF.
Many of my posts are aimed purely at pointing out the folly of believing anything the Village Idiott says or dos rather than the other stuff which I leave to others.
The trHYPE Gang pose a big threat to innocent and naive investors so want to protect them from swallowing any of trHYPE.
Der Leader has just CONfirmed with his CONfirmation bias theory that he is deluded as we ALL know he is the only ONE who needs to CONsider his Bias in a more balanced way as his huge EGO is the ONE eleohant in the Room that everyone acknowledges is there but Only he does not see it

drdobson1
05/2/2019
08:26
Apparently Ichor's the problem.... Complete lack of understanding of the process....
Never mind.
AIMO
ATB

oldnotwise
05/2/2019
08:20
On a different topic, I see we're offered below 7p again....
ATB

oldnotwise
05/2/2019
08:17
TF
Not at all, it's the frustration of seeing off topic and deliberately argumentative posts appearing on a BB which has recently been not only informative but REALISTIC.
Since the realism is appropriate to the general drift of the majority of market related comments on this BB over the last few years, I'm sure you'll appreciate how annoying it is to see attempts to generate childish arguments and deflect discussions by silly posts that attempt to demean and create chaos.
So no, not keeping bad company, but attempting to enjoy discussions (not arguments) that had become the trademark of this BB of late before the disruptive (and misinformed in many areas)force that returned recently to clog the flow of discussion.
Hope that helps.
AIMO
ATB

oldnotwise
05/2/2019
07:51
So.... we now have absolute proof that, as per the posts of many of us on here recently, Scancell need funding ( not that it took any form of rocket science to work that out, a school kid could have done it, which then questions the intellect of a few posters on the other place who claimed differently )...as per C7's post, i quote... " CH has assured me and i guess anybody in contact with him that EVERY avenue is being pursued for funding ".

So once again, contrary to the village idiots claims that we are fully funded, he has been shown to be TOTALLY WRONG yet again.... it must get so boring for him to be proven to be wrong, time after time after time.

And as for the village idiots posts on human bias ! I find it extraordinary that the biggest advocate of bias anywhere, has the audacity to accuse someone else of it ! its astonishing !
The guy needs therapy , lots of it, and very quickly.

tosh123
05/2/2019
04:55
ONW your 19286 - you never used to post such ? Keeping bad Company ? ATB
torquayfan
04/2/2019
21:50
NXC, thanks for the response. Axis Shield, held those many years ago as well as EKF.
gazza
04/2/2019
21:49
Yes what annoys me is being misled about level of interest when it patently obvious it has not been there.As you say Panama a lot of genuine investors have poured a lot ifbthere hard earned in here and worse some have invested in the fakes hope of finding a cure for cancer.
Is it too much too expect an Honest response as that would effect the degree of rusk.

We know baNABA is thick and a proven liar and CONman so we ignore his unbalanced rants but members of the board we should be able to trust.

drdobson1
04/2/2019
20:33
Tosh, it is now very apparent that apart from there being "significant interest" in both platforms as
we have been informed on several occasions by the BOD that in fact there is very little interest..
The BOD have gone cap in hand to a multitude of different Investors for funds and been knocked
back every time. We have been told that Moditope was a " serendipitous discovery" yet the Scientist
that discovered it can't even be bothered to develop it on a full time basis. The fact is this a high risk
Investment where the Company over a period of seven years have failed to alleviate any of that risk for
their Investors but have taken no risks whatsoever themselves. Someone posted a link in the last couple of weeks for
a company that had responded to FDA questions. They responded at the end of December and got approval
at the end of January at a time of the FDA being in partial shutdown. We have had a full four months to address
what we were told was a minor issue and it has still not been rectified. Can we actually believe anything the
BOD tell us.

panama7
04/2/2019
18:40
Tosh..
It's a shame when someone can't understand a diplomatic answer from six years ago....
ATB

oldnotwise
04/2/2019
17:49
Tosh ...

hey Mate ... you made the Academy ..

good luck with Star Wars .. !!

inanaco
04/2/2019
17:47
ineptico,
just slither back to where you came from.
Your attempts to goad are not working... just emphasises your jealousy at others having had the nous to trade their way to a free bet rather than sitting on MASSIVE losses.
Now jog on loser.

DE,
thanks for your continued input, its extremely enlightening and informative.
On a lighter note, lets hope that the current BOD have invested in a big white fluffy bunny rabbit and a small hat, as well as in people.

tosh123
04/2/2019
17:39
NXC i asked you a question back in 2013 ...

Do you think we are looking at "Arm Holdings" scenario

you replied probably not under your watch, age etc was mentioned ...

what do you think now ?

outright sale

or

a succession of License agreements and collaborations developing into a Research Power House funded by potential royalty stream's that would dwarf "Arm Holdings"

inanaco
04/2/2019
17:35
Gazza,
who knows ? The guy is a compulsive Liar.
You cant believe a word he says, so even if he did claim to sell some, it would only be his word, and that, im afraid to say, is totally worthless.

tosh123
04/2/2019
17:33
People buy People and the science community and the oncology sub-segment is a club in a general sense so being clubable is a distinct advantage - all decisions are meant to be objectively taken but those decisions are taken by human beings with the biases and prejudices that we all carry - why anyone thinks that scientists are any different amazes me. I do not think charities or individual philanthropists lack knowledge per se but their crystal ball tends to be no better than yours or mine. I learnt that lesson many moons ago from the late Hamish Hale and a discussion he had with me and others at Shield Diagnostics in relation to British Biotechnology.
nxc
04/2/2019
17:31
Tosh .....

"I will continue to hold no matter what"

LOL ...

spends years """talking""" the share down ... while ...


"I will continue to hold no matter what"

inanaco
04/2/2019
17:29
Wanderer, the whole point of pumping is to follow up with dumping. Is that what you think has happened?
gazza
04/2/2019
17:22
In reality, Inanaco's investment as tanked and the man as not got the courage to admit after years and years of pumping this dog he as called it totally wrong, In fact he reminds me of our PM and her inability to deal with Brexit, both clueless cretins
wanderer1210_0
04/2/2019
17:22
DE,
I will continue to hold no matter what, im just intrigued as to what the BOD are going to do next.

tosh123
04/2/2019
17:15
Im just going to ignore your childish and totally unfounded rubbish.
My posts are very clear, as is the current situation, all your uneducated nonsense will not change that fact, nor will it alter the FACT that there are massive RISKS.

You just ramble away like a spoilt child who has yet again been proven to be WRONG.

Now please just jog on.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, thanks again DE for your reply, as ONW says, the mechanics and risks surrounding a possible sale are a lot deeper than many people thought ( myself included ) and somewhat dispels the fairy tale of a long queue eager to invest waiting in the wings.
As a company it looks like we are increasingly getting into a chicken and egg scenario. We need to prove the science via the trials, but we need the money to finish the trials.
The CRUK funding is a great indicator of the potential and advocates their belief in the scancell, but although brilliant in isolation ( and very welcome i might add ) its not enough to complete the overall master plan, there are still massive financial holes that need filling.
Any ideas ?

tosh123
04/2/2019
17:09
NXC,

There seems to be lot of money spent on research with not a lot resulting in actual treatments. Perhaps the charities lack the knowledge and expertise to be able to identify which companies and ideas will bear fruit?

gazza
04/2/2019
16:56
we have to accept

that our Space Cadets ... feel they can run Scancell more efficiently ...

Tosh has attempted a previous takeover .. but top sliced many years ago

Tosh feels the share price is a true reflection of the IP .. and seems to ignore the latest funding round which takes us back into trial and indeed a possible monetisation of 3 epitopes with BioNtech

as Tosh is now ""apparently"" . a "Ghost Director" and has now provided a solution, Scancell should sit and listen .. and I suspect just Ignore along with the rest of the emails offering "sound advice"

meanwhile the rest of us will get on with our lives while Scancell proceed with what has already been agreed from the last funding round and in due course prove up what has been developed so far and turn great science into success with Patients treated on the trials getting that elusive CR Badge

inanaco
04/2/2019
16:41
Tosh - clearly Scancell have succeeded in gaining funding from CRUK subsequent to my departure which was not an inconsequential chunk of dosh. From memory there was a discussion with a Cambridge based charity which came to nothing and there was another discussion re Gliablastoma and Moditope from a charity - both came to nothing for reasons I cannot remember
nxc
Chat Pages: Latest  774  773  772  771  770  769  768  767  766  765  764  763  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock