Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 11:59

its warming up here in the city as well.
just ventured out for a smoke and its getting very warm out there, so maybe a few glasses of fermented grape juice at a nice restaurant I know by the wobbly bridge, will in order later this evening.

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 11:57

and Happy 70th Birthday my friend.

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 11:57

Good luck to you Lozan.

[the real lozan] 18/4/2018 11:53

Tosh, Gash et al...P S
Just touching 35 C in the sun on our South facing terrace =
Sans souçi

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 11:50

agema,
exactly.
its only £8 mill so any pharma could underwrite it from the petty cash box, it just doesn't make sense.
All the sheep will bleat about how great it is, but the reality is that its wiped 20% off an already struggling share price.
That said, I believe that we may have now bottomed, so really expect a steady rise from here, maybe back into the mid 20's by the end of the Summer . The elephant has been shown the door for the foreseeable future, but will definitely stay around until a real deal is struck.

[rhatton] 18/4/2018 11:44

Agema, fair points.
Will this last one year? Maybe by then BioNtech will be happy to license the TCR stuff? We can hope! Otherwise as you say more cash required.

[agema] 18/4/2018 11:41

I notice one of the things Scancell want the cash for. Is to support the CRUK deal. Is there more to this than has been let on. Funding wise.?

If you read all what this money is for and you add on yearly running costs. You will soon work out that this is nowhere near enough. More dilution coming for sure.

More cashraising to come. Possibly America. ?

If these products and platforms are so good. Why are the placings always at a Discount to the share price and not a premium to it.?

If so good. Why do big pharma not get involved.?

Mmmmmmmmm.

[the real lozan] 18/4/2018 11:25

For those with eyes to see -
IF one CAN / does - tears oneself away from the 'OVER ATTACHMENT' to ANY particular share... and focus on the REAL game of 'MAKING a PROFIT'...what is REALITY ???
SO-
Which is the 'better play'
.
To buy IMM yesterday at 20p
OR
To BUY SCLP yesterday at 17.5p
.
SIX years going on SEVEN

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 11:07

I know, I saw that... 2% hahaha
he's not good with numbers.

Still, once again we have proven him to be utterly clueless.
I'm not sure why he continues to make such an idiot of himself, its laughable.

[doerx2] 18/4/2018 11:06

Stitched up comes to mind

[fragma] 18/4/2018 10:51

Timbo, ok, i'm guessing once the placing has been finalised you will be able to divulge ?

[timbo003] 18/4/2018 10:41

>>>>Panama

I don't know the details, but if you have real concerns and good evidence, you should report it to the FCA. Insider dealing is illegal and the harsh penalties are there for a good reason.

[the real lozan] 18/4/2018 10:39

SIX YEARS of trHYPE / SCAM driven LOSSES
And STILL the 'sheep bleat'
SEVEN YEARS of trHYPE / SCAM driven LOSSES....BECKONS
.
The latest 'howling at the moon' seems to be =
Sheeple are BUY,BUY,BUYing NOW @ 14p ish -seemingly... to be able to BUY,BUY,BUY MORE, later @ 12p { Maybe less if the market chooses} ... via, an OO, which as yet =
NO ONE knows / has not even been announced... the numbers
{ 1 for 10 ???...1 for 20 ??? }
.
The MADNEES attached to this share is ASTONISHING
{ But... *WE ALL* know = where it originates }

[panama7] 18/4/2018 10:33

Timbo , if that was the case why did the BOD of Calculus not go to jail in 2013. I have never seen a more blatant case of Insider Trading and if you look at the share price performance of the last 5 years my statement is vindicated.

[timbo003] 18/4/2018 10:32

>>>fragma

That is not something I am able to disclose at this time.

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 10:30

P
I think they were.
if you look, there were a few trades going through, and the share price activity suggested that this was being set up for a raise.
I did write that last week / earlier this week.

[timbo003] 18/4/2018 10:29

>>>>panama

Because it would be considered insider trading, which is illegal and if found guilty the punishments are severe (Jail time)

[fragma] 18/4/2018 10:27

Thanks again Timbo, if I may, What was the indicative price ?

[panama7] 18/4/2018 10:20

Tosh, if that was the case why were II not selling knowing they could buy back cheaper ?

[tosh 123] 18/4/2018 10:13

timbo,
ditto.
a certain broker was doing the rounds on Monday.

[timbo003] 18/4/2018 10:06

>>>fragma

You are told the amount the company wants to raise, the reasons why they are raising the money, an indicative price (or price range) per share at which the fund raising will proceed and the anticipated timings for the fund raising (sometimes they require a general meeting before some or all of the shares can be issued)

[fragma] 18/4/2018 09:56

Thanks Timbo, Do they let you know the placing details such as price as amount to be issued as well ?

[the real lozan] 18/4/2018 09:53

Tosh et al -
I am reminded that in the trHYPE world, I am described - for propaganda reasons,as a 'nutter' by SUB ZERO
However, I recall the placing of 22p
I took all I could get
I SOLD all I took at 38+p { For which I was again scorned CONstantly by insane'n'co}
I took the money I made in PROFITS { Which paid for TONNES of winter fuel oak logs}
AGAIN, and ever since ={ For which I was again scorned CONstantly by insane'n'co}
Whilst the SCAMMER was buying at 44+p, telling EVERYONE to BUY,BUY,BUY and hold =
Not wanting the S P driven down by anyone taking PROFITS.
.
HE tells *US ALL*, HE holds 600,000 shares... so along with other 'braggers' today comes as a 'Smack in the gob' ..12p ??? {BUY,and Hold}
.
Both, HIS BUY, BUY, BUy and Hold...and my 'Make'n'Take PROFITS' scenarios, have since *Gone-up-in-SMOKE*
The difference/ REALITY is = I at least benefitted from the heat generated - keeping us warm through the winter months.
HE got 'smoked' ....AGAIN