We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.15 | -1.62% | 9.10 | 8.70 | 9.50 | 9.25 | 9.10 | 9.25 | 321,812 | 14:04:44 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.05 | 84.43M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
11/7/2017 09:00 | If the progress is so 'excellent', where is a phase3 study ? | kreature | |
11/7/2017 07:44 | A very good RNS this morning showing excellent progress on SCIB1. | 888icb | |
10/7/2017 22:40 | A mess indeed, C7 off in another huff, PCPLOD beating up his neighbours and Nana glowing in his demise of the FOOL. Another day tomorrow........ | terror | |
10/7/2017 14:50 | What a mess over on channel 4. Calamity 7 has finally realised ( and accepted ) that Ineptico has mislead those who would listen to the idiot. Ineptico lamely continues to spout his total nonsense, and merely reinforces his stupidity. Theres also various claims for some PR, which would have been great a few months / years ago, but who in their right mind would want the PR job to increase the current share price for a company that, by its own admission, is looking to raise over $20 mill ? The idiot Ineptico is a massive embarrassment to anyone from Devonshire , my only solace is that he clearly isn't a local, but someone that has ended up there... wish we had a border control ! | tosh123 | |
07/7/2017 11:48 | From trHYPE HQ- As the S P 'falters' following the 'exit' of the 'smart money', the trHYPERS are seen to resort to the 'old favourite' of NEWS {any day }... only the 'slight adjusment' to now "NEWS NEXT WEEK"...or = the week after that, or the week after that *WE* shall see... BUT = Don't hold your breath.... They HAVE been WRONG before........on the 'odd' occations | the real lozan | |
05/7/2017 16:15 | One would have thought HE might have 'stuck-to' a subject HE can speak about, with a degree of 'expertise' ??? Something like = The quality / reliability... of locks, fitted by H M P. ??? | the real lozan | |
05/7/2017 15:49 | Brilliant... he has the audacity to believe that he can vouch for the credibility of the creator of the science.... It beggars belief, hahahaha... Lindy must be hugely relieved that she has his backing otherwise the whole business would have been worthless.... Phew. All of which is good because i wouldn't have slept at night unless Ineptico had reinforced that Professor Durrant knew what she was doing... praise the lord, i can now relax safe in the knowledge that a village idiot has sanctioned the science... that was a close one. | tosh123 | |
05/7/2017 14:59 | hahaha.... if i couldn't read it, i wouldn't believe it ! That LIAR Ineptico telling the world that he leads the market hahaha... what an idiot. Why would you even try to advertise the fact that you've lead the market in an 80% downturn, whilst buying hahaha, you cant make this stuff up.. The guy is even more stupid than i gave him credit for. His ego knows no bounds, and he still refers to himself in the third person hahaha. For once Calamity 7 absolutely side swipes him.... Brilliant. | tosh123 | |
04/7/2017 22:28 | The FOOL and PCPLOD are back after Sophie's imposed exile for causing bovver in Lundin Town. Nice bait from the Farmer, wonder if the Bovver Boys will take him up on the accusation that there are better returns elsewhere. | terror | |
04/7/2017 12:26 | And, whilst Raindrop brings up the subject of 'chuckles' , there is the 'comedy classic' from JJ / Suntans, who wanted to draw everyone's attention to the 'presence of' "PAID DERAMPERS" ... which of course *WE* ALL know = NOne such EXISTS . As opposed to 'trHYPE merchants' = Who CLEARLY ....DO. | the real lozan | |
04/7/2017 10:37 | Glad to hear it Raindrop - So here's a 'side-splitter' post - NOT MINE - from several months ago, that had many REALISTS 'crying with laughter', and many trHYPE swallowers left- well. just 'crying' = " This will be £6 a share in 18 months " | the real lozan | |
04/7/2017 10:16 | "with a bit of 'humour' thrown in"Your posts certainly make me chuckle. | wigwammer | |
04/7/2017 09:48 | Raindrop - Are you one of those people who FAIL to grasp, that the benefit of these forums, is that when anyone 'spots' a 'possible'..'Fly in the ointment'... one can draw any such item to the attention of others by way of asking = *IF* { this says this, does that MEAN that ??? } THUS- opening-up a topic for debate, in hopes that via responses by fellow *responsible* forum users. Which, in turn leads to an *understanding* of any given *IF*. Collective Alternative Views then aid *US* towards the TRUE SITUATION . Polite, exchanges { with a bit of 'humour' thrown in } are what these forums are REALLY for. = BALANCE. NOT just to spread unsound trHYPE... that *guides* the unwary into a *COSTLY* - FALSE SITUATION | the real lozan | |
04/7/2017 08:06 | The share price has been falling for years and we have been told that the FOOL is gravely ill. in intensive care and unable to get around. Fast forward to 10p and up to 12.5p and suddenly the Fool has a miraculous recovery, tumour free and posting every buy trade during the recovery. And now he has been given a short term ban............ | terror | |
03/7/2017 20:27 | "'The Sh 1 t to hit the fan' ???IF my 'attention to detail', is eventually shown to represent the TRUE SITUATION, this will no doubt transform into A VERY SERIOUS MATTER indeed."Your attention to detail appears to have missed that the RNS was non regulatory and contains information already in the public domain.It appears you are standing in front of the fan. | wigwammer | |
03/7/2017 18:38 | Raindrop - I don't think even the most devoted trHYPER could argue against the observation - that whole P R, mini Funding and European patent issues COULD and SHOULD have been handled much better. Something for BoD to bear in mind for the NEXT round of ... OR...VITAL FUNDING { Which-ever comes first} ??? | the real lozan | |
03/7/2017 17:54 | "i really would have thought that something as significant as the granting of a European patent would have been major news"The RNS was issued as non regulatory. | wigwammer | |
03/7/2017 15:56 | Lozan, Trust you are now well and truly chilled. Perhaps a better question is how can information that is freely available to the general public be classed as inside information? | bermudashorts | |
03/7/2017 15:53 | Tosh, I'm not suggesting for one second that robust IP protection isn't absolutely fundamental to any bio. I'm simply saying that this patent had already been granted in several countries including the USA - the largest single market for Scancell's products. Therefore, it was a fair assumption that grants in other states would follow as and when and there was no reason to think otherwise. So it wasn't earth shattering major news. The first grant of the Moditope patent may be a different matter as apart from the IP protection, it will also confirm the extent of that protection - that will be major news IMO. You appear to have been suggesting that something underhand had been going on in connection with the funding and that clearly was not the case. | bermudashorts | |
03/7/2017 15:42 | BoB - Thanks for your 9805 However = " Your 'suggestion' that Scancell had given potential investors insider information regarding the patent is therefore nonsense." I would venture = Your *question* *of whether Scancell COULD HAVE* given potential investors insider information regarding the patent is therefore *worth asking*. . As I said = Thanks for your 9805... BUT... Can I make a 'request' ??? Having just come inside to 'cool-off' and change 'sweaty' tee-shirts, following time spent gardening {now 35+ C in the sunshine}... reading your full explanation posts, allows me an 'excuse' to spend more time to 'cool-off'. So, could you make 'em a bit longer ??? - / o | the real lozan |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions