Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[tosh123] 28/6/2017 11:05

Wig,
you're right, i also heard it at 6p

[terror] 28/6/2017 10:51

Only another 89p to go

[wigwammer] 28/6/2017 10:44

"Heard it all before.."I'm sure you have tosh.But not at circa 10p.

[tosh123] 28/6/2017 10:24

Heard it all before...many times...
lets just keep our feet on the ground and see what happens re the funding.

[the real lozan] 28/6/2017 10:15

He already has... ages ago

[wanderer1210_0] 28/6/2017 10:12

Here we go the share price rises 10% in a few days and we get these comments "almost inevitable bid.for the co."Go all in then 777 is my advice, remortgage the house, sell everything and lump it in here.

[j777j] 28/6/2017 09:41

They may risk missing out on an almost inevitable bid.for the co.

[wigwammer] 28/6/2017 09:38

I fully expect many of the doubters here will demand a sizeable hype premium before purchasing again (a bit like last time).

[j777j] 28/6/2017 09:37

European patent grants massively derisks Scancell for a buyer.

[j777j] 28/6/2017 07:08

Telegraph....... htTP://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/06/26/pioneering-british-firm-wins-patent-cancer-vaccines-technology/

[terror] 27/6/2017 23:31

Goodfellow should be replaced sooner than later as 15 years doing nothing is unacceptable. No wonder he was dumped by his former employer.

Goodfellow = Badmanagement

[kreature] 27/6/2017 21:04

If phase 2 was so successful, where is phase 3 ?

[waterloo01] 27/6/2017 18:24

No one spot this?

[wigwammer] 27/6/2017 17:07

"a belief that this might get to market"Thanks Tosh.

[the real lozan] 27/6/2017 17:02

As *WE* see the "STRONG BUY CLIQUE" jumping up-and-down at people 'apparently' joining in the 'fun buying' at 11p = a decision reached on little more than a couple of newspaper articles, other than of which = NOTHING has changed.
The WISER, more ASTUTE investor will NOT have been distracted away from the 'Elephant - that remains - in the Room' .... that of FUNDING.

[tosh123] 27/6/2017 16:33

wig,
my positive outlook is a protracted outlook, not an immediate one, this could easily fold at any minute, conversely, it could be sold, but the latter is less probable.
Lets be clear here, this is a sh1t show right now, and has been for many years. The company has been fundamentally mismanaged and changed direction more times than a shoal of herring.
As i said earlier, if this was your company, i have no doubts that like me, you would canned RG a long time ago.
I gave a precis after RG's presentation at the Brewery here in London some time ago. I said that RG looked and sounded sheepish, and that i had massive reservations that he was telling the truth, for which i was lambasted by the usual idiots, only for an OO to be announced a few days later. The man stood there in a room full of PI's and stated that the finances were fine, and that no further funding was required for a year !
This will hopefully work, but again, as previously stated, if it does, it will be despite certain people , rather than because of them.
I have great sympathy for LG, who has continued to produce great science and results. She ( IMHO ) has been very badly let down by those around her, and therefore, her loyalty is admirable ( i bet she has had many offers from far more lucrative locations than lowly Scancell ).
Anyway, my point here is, that you should not confuse my positive quotes as being anything other than a belief that this might get to market. Trust me, if i was looking down the same financial barrel as most of the idiots on LSE, then i would be a lot more pessimistic and vocal about the inept management, but as it is, i have very little to lose, so unlike them im happy to take a free ride.

[wigwammer] 27/6/2017 16:31

"When one HAS already been PROVEN to have BEEN 100% RIGHT about it ???"I can't imagine what might go wrong for you.Perhaps Tosh can help again.

[the real lozan] 27/6/2017 16:28

Indeed -
If one makes observations / opinions thar PROVE to be 100% ACCURATE / RIGHT = this HAS to be = they were 'POSSITIVE'.
If, on the other hand,one repeatedly makes-up observations / opinions that are PROVEN to have been FALSE or WRONG + they were in REALITY 'NEGATIVES'.
IF those FALSE CLAIMS / opinions lead others into HUGE LOSSES, then they were the REAL NEGATIVES.
Perhaps anyone seeking to label anyone as 'NEGATIVE', should look elsewhere, rather than 'try to focus blame' on those who have been repeatedly PROVEN to have been 100% RIGHT.

[the real lozan] 27/6/2017 15:48

Tosh et al -
Obviously many of *US* who frequent these forums, hail from an era, in which - unlike the 'modern trendies'...*WE* were taught that FACTS are indeed = FACTS.
When 'doing SUMS'... anything other than the CORRECT answer = HAS to be WRONG
Could ANYONE point-out = How can one IMPROVE on something,,,,When one HAS already been PROVEN to have BEEN 100% RIGHT about it ???

[wigwammer] 27/6/2017 15:19

Tosh - people have the right to say what they wish on this board. I support your wish to point to positives regarding your investment here.Lozan - you haven't proven anything other than that your diction is limited to speaking in negatives.

[the real lozan] 27/6/2017 14:30

Mr Warmer
You now only need to show you have been PROVEN to have been correct about anything you have said to date.
Something many many posters of REALISM on here, have achieved on numerous occasions.

[tosh123] 27/6/2017 14:28

Wig,
Lozan has every right to be sceptical about the hype surrounding this share. Historically there have been a few individuals who have sought to misrepresent and darn right LIE about the mechanics of investing, specifically in this share.
There have been mindless, uneducated village idiots, who have strived , and in a lot circumstances, succeeded, in parting joe public with his hard earnt.
There is potential here, but as many of us older investors warned of, there is also very high risk. These risks were poo pooed by many people who are now looking at massive losses, and those among us that warned others to be careful, were ridiculed for calling things 100% correct.
Clearly, faceless hyping idiots on a BB cannot be held fully responsible for the losses incurred by the sheep over on the other channel, those who listened must feel sick at their own lack of judgement right now. A lot of that guilt must also lie at the doors or certain BOD members who have systematically misled their private investor client base with their promises of great wealth, hence why i refer to RG so often, the guy is a menace and should be struck off the BOD as far as im concerned.

lets just hope that anyone topping up or buying for the first time at these distressed levels, doesn't fall foul of the pump and dump mentality again, so prevalent on AIM, but particularly with this share.
There are still about 2 years to go before anything meaningful happens here, so anyone buying should take that into consideration prior to investing, rather than listen to the lunacy of the LSE board, which has been 100% wrong for 100% of the time... Good luck sir.

[wigwammer] 27/6/2017 14:17

"Being ABLE to spot a BUY, BUY, BUY scam CLUB... and thus, avoid being 'duped' into sitting on HUGE LOSSES"I'll give myself a pat on the back then."If it happens, then my upside is pretty much infinite"Good point Tosh.