We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 10.10 | 9.70 | 10.50 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.83 | 93.71M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
02/2/2019 10:17 | P S - There used to be 6 .as yet, unused toilet rolls in the 'ladies loo cupboard' But R G 'waltzed off' with 3 as part of his 'leaving package'. | the real lozan | |
02/2/2019 09:56 | How to PROVE = "well we have £8.7 m in the bank " Having tried to mislead HIS 'victims' with FALSE CLAIMS of "well we have £10 m in the bank'...because the RNS showed, what *WE ALL* knew, was NOT the case = "Group cash balance at 31 October 2018 was £7.6 million"... HE tries to settle for a STILL FALSE CLAIM of "well we have £8.7 m in the bank ". AS *WE ALL* know, and some say the ACTUAL £7.6 mil is up to £2 mil LESS now,*WE ALL* might ask = How does HE try to CLAIM - "well we have £8.7 m in the bank " ??? --- By inventing monies that MIGHT have been spent = Cash in the bank. E.G. We may ACTUALLY now have, let's say £5.7 mil in cash ... BUT {with nanny logic} There are 3 - as yet, unused toilet rolls in the 'ladies loo cupboard' So, HE values these 3 'unused toilet rolls' as now 'CASH assets' of £1 mil each = £3 mil. Add this FAKE £3 mil to the possible/probable £5.7 mil 'Cash in the bank' et voilà = Der trHYPE leader's SCAM = £8.7 mil . HIS problem is - The WISER,more ASTUTE and markets....CAN do PROPER sums | the real lozan | |
01/2/2019 22:19 | Gazza you are not responsible for a BOD who have consistently let their Investors down while lining their own pockets. They conned people into Investing and have hung them out to dry ever since. They have taken no responsibility whatsoever for their words , actions and deeds. After seeing them in action at the AGM there is no doubt they are actually quite a despicable bunch. | panama7 | |
01/2/2019 19:06 | Panama, i have to take responsibility for my own investments regardless of whether the bod on occasions have been misleading. The trade sale of SCIB was what drew me in originally. | gazza | |
01/2/2019 18:35 | Gazza, you state this is your biggest loss making Investment ever. do you think you are totally responsible for that or do think you have been somewhat misled by the BOD. | panama7 | |
01/2/2019 15:39 | There is no doubt he is a sleazeball, he is a know nothing nobody but he is not responsible for the plight of the Company and the Shareprice. If Investors have bought on the back of his inane rubbish then they only have themselves to blame. If they bought based on what has emanated from the BOD over the last 6 years then that is another matter. | panama7 | |
01/2/2019 14:00 | "Is there a bigger sleazeball on any BOD on the AIM Market." ??? . Maybe not BUT There is ONE 'bigger sleazeball' who thinks HE should be { IS } on the BOD. | the real lozan | |
01/2/2019 13:46 | Gazza, I agree with you of course the share price matters but not if you read LSE and listen to Goodfellow. Let's face it the share price does not matter to the BOD as they adjust there Options to take into account dilution and a falling share price I wonder if Goodfellow while counting his 300K gave any thought to the 2 Investors who have already passed away without seeing a return on their money. Or in fact did he give any thought to the Terminally ill Cancer Patients at the AGM who are resigned to never seeing a return on their money. Is there a bigger sleazeball on any BOD on the AIM Market. | panama7 | |
01/2/2019 11:53 | As you say, the wise astute will have bought in the teens and sold in the 30's and 40's. For me, as it stands, this is my biggest loss making investment ever. So no, it hasn't been a "good investment". As to whether it remains that way, only time will tell. | gazza | |
01/2/2019 11:44 | Just as a matter of 'interest' - Does ANYONE think/believe, {other than those WISE, more ASTUTE who have made/taken PROFITS } over the past years...this has been 'a GOOD INVESTMENT' ??? | the real lozan | |
01/2/2019 11:14 | lozan, who's posts? I think all mine are still there. | gazza | |
01/2/2019 10:46 | M F F F ---??? Once again *WE ALL* CAN see posts of those offering COUNTER views to the BUY,BUY,BUY SCAM gang...REMOVED Whilst, trHYPERS posts remain How long before folks realise, there HAS to be something seriously 'NOT RIGHT' with that site ??? | the real lozan | |
01/2/2019 10:43 | panama, the share price most definitely does matter. As I keep saying, we should have raised £30M at 8p when the share price was 12. | gazza | |
01/2/2019 10:37 | You really have to wonder who's going to pay 5.5p, I would hazard a guess that 4p is more credible with institutions, to raise £10m persay which is not unfeasible that's a extra 250m shares on the market, £1 on the cards? Values Scancell at £620m with nothing in trial, going to be a long haul, best if there was a fire sale 15p and be done | wanderer1210_0 | |
01/2/2019 10:15 | To raise sufficient cash it will HAVE to be far more than 20% even at these levels let alone lower. An EGM is inevitable unless there is a "deal" providing substantial cash. | gazza | |
01/2/2019 10:14 | Gash et al - Just to lift 'a few spirits', I am happy to report, as *WE not ALL* move into Feb, the signs of our 'Early Spring' = A bright sunny morning, 18 C in the sun on the south facing terrace . ... I must confess, I am 'prone' to the odd smile of satisfaction, when I recall 'items' like = LULL...."What LULL" | the real lozan | |
01/2/2019 09:59 | Dr Dobson, like you I would absolutely love it if they called an EGM. They got away ridiculously lightly at the AGM. To be honest I don't think they would have the balls to call an EGM they would rather just raise a paltry 3m to keep the lights on and cover their salaries and hope there is a miracle on the horizon | panama7 | |
01/2/2019 09:55 | P7 If they called an EGM I would turn up and give them a peace of my mind similar to what you did at AGM. If that PLUM turned up I would love it and could really sweat him out | drdobson1 | |
01/2/2019 09:15 | So we know from yesterday's fantastic news which the company were very pleased to announce that we will be needing more funds in a few months. The company can only dilute by 20% of existing shares of 387m so that allows for 77m new shares. Based on today's share price you would expect a fundraising at best of about 5.5p, this would allow the Company to raise a maximimum after costs of about 3.8m, just about enough to keep the lights on and pay the over inflated salaries. Of course the BOD could call an EGM to amend the 20% , would love to see them do that. Based on all that are there still shareholders who think the share price doesn't matter. Just to add there is absolutely nothing on the horizon to transform the share price in the short term. | panama7 | |
31/1/2019 16:30 | Kreature, Goodfellow updated the Market today on the 2013trade sale, he stated due to the numerous fundraises since then he has adjusted the many multiples of 34p to a more realistic 50% discount, so that will be 17p. He also took inflation , the pound and Brexit into consideration. | panama7 | |
31/1/2019 16:06 | Tosh, glad you brought up Lindy, I think she is part of the problem. As I said previously providing she is given money to carry on her research and is paid a salary I really don't think she is bothered what it costs Shareholders. Don't forget she has had her option targets adjusted a couple of times to negate any dilution. We were originally told Moditope would be ready for human trials in 2016 does anyone think that had she been a full time CSO we would still be waiting for the trial. The fact is Tosh in 6 years not one single timeline has been achieved, they haven't been missed by months but by years. | panama7 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions