ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

10.10
0.00 (0.00%)
03 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 10.10 9.70 10.50 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 5.27M -11.94M -0.0129 -7.83 93.71M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 10.10p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 7.65p to 18.125p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £93.71 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -7.83.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 19151 to 19171 of 67200 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  768  767  766  765  764  763  762  761  760  759  758  757  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
02/2/2019
10:17
P S -
There used to be 6 .as yet, unused toilet rolls in the 'ladies loo cupboard'
But
R G 'waltzed off' with 3 as part of his 'leaving package'.

the real lozan
02/2/2019
09:56
How to PROVE = "well we have £8.7 m in the bank "
Having tried to mislead HIS 'victims' with FALSE CLAIMS of "well we have £10 m in the bank'...because the RNS showed, what *WE ALL* knew, was NOT the case = "Group cash balance at 31 October 2018 was £7.6 million"... HE tries to settle for a STILL FALSE CLAIM of "well we have £8.7 m in the bank ".
AS *WE ALL* know, and some say the ACTUAL £7.6 mil is up to £2 mil LESS now,*WE ALL* might ask = How does HE try to CLAIM - "well we have £8.7 m in the bank " ???
--- By inventing monies that MIGHT have been spent = Cash in the bank.
E.G.
We may ACTUALLY now have, let's say £5.7 mil in cash ... BUT {with nanny logic}
There are 3 - as yet, unused toilet rolls in the 'ladies loo cupboard'
So, HE values these 3 'unused toilet rolls' as now 'CASH assets' of £1 mil each = £3 mil.
Add this FAKE £3 mil to the possible/probable £5.7 mil 'Cash in the bank' et voilà =
Der trHYPE leader's SCAM = £8.7 mil
.
HIS problem is - The WISER,more ASTUTE and markets....CAN do PROPER sums

the real lozan
01/2/2019
22:19
Gazza you are not responsible for a BOD who have consistently let their Investors down while lining their own pockets. They conned people into Investing and have hung them out to dry ever since. They have taken no responsibility whatsoever for their words , actions and deeds. After seeing them in action at the AGM there is no doubt they are actually quite a despicable bunch.
panama7
01/2/2019
19:06
Panama, i have to take responsibility for my own investments regardless of whether the bod on occasions have been misleading. The trade sale of SCIB was what drew me in originally.
gazza
01/2/2019
18:35
Gazza, you state this is your biggest loss making Investment ever. do you think you are totally responsible for that or do think you have been somewhat misled by the BOD.
panama7
01/2/2019
15:39
There is no doubt he is a sleazeball, he is a know nothing nobody but he is not responsible for the plight of the Company and the Shareprice. If Investors have bought on the back of his inane rubbish then they only have themselves to blame. If they bought based on what has emanated from the BOD over the last 6 years then that is another matter.
panama7
01/2/2019
14:00
"Is there a bigger sleazeball on any BOD on the AIM Market." ???
.
Maybe not
BUT
There is ONE 'bigger sleazeball' who thinks HE should be { IS } on the BOD.

the real lozan
01/2/2019
13:46
Gazza, I agree with you of course the share price matters but not if you read LSE and listen to Goodfellow. Let's face it the share price does not matter to the BOD as they adjust there Options to take into account dilution and a falling share price I wonder if Goodfellow while counting his 300K gave any thought to the 2 Investors who have already passed away without seeing a return on their money. Or in fact did he give any thought to the Terminally ill Cancer Patients at the AGM who are resigned to never seeing a return on their money. Is there a bigger sleazeball on any BOD on the AIM Market.
panama7
01/2/2019
11:53
As you say, the wise astute will have bought in the teens and sold in the 30's and 40's.
For me, as it stands, this is my biggest loss making investment ever. So no, it hasn't been a "good investment". As to whether it remains that way, only time will tell.

gazza
01/2/2019
11:44
Just as a matter of 'interest' -
Does ANYONE think/believe, {other than those WISE, more ASTUTE who have made/taken PROFITS } over the past years...this has been 'a GOOD INVESTMENT' ???

the real lozan
01/2/2019
11:14
lozan,

who's posts? I think all mine are still there.

gazza
01/2/2019
10:46
M F F F ---???
Once again *WE ALL* CAN see posts of those offering COUNTER views to the BUY,BUY,BUY SCAM gang...REMOVED
Whilst, trHYPERS posts remain
How long before folks realise, there HAS to be something seriously 'NOT RIGHT' with that site ???

the real lozan
01/2/2019
10:43
panama, the share price most definitely does matter. As I keep saying, we should have raised £30M at 8p when the share price was 12.
gazza
01/2/2019
10:37
You really have to wonder who's going to pay 5.5p, I would hazard a guess that 4p is more credible with institutions, to raise £10m persay which is not unfeasible that's a extra 250m shares on the market, £1 on the cards? Values Scancell at £620m with nothing in trial, going to be a long haul, best if there was a fire sale 15p and be done
wanderer1210_0
01/2/2019
10:15
To raise sufficient cash it will HAVE to be far more than 20% even at these levels let alone lower. An EGM is inevitable unless there is a "deal" providing substantial cash.
gazza
01/2/2019
10:14
Gash et al -
Just to lift 'a few spirits', I am happy to report, as *WE not ALL* move into Feb, the signs of our 'Early Spring' = A bright sunny morning, 18 C in the sun on the south facing terrace .
...
I must confess, I am 'prone' to the odd smile of satisfaction, when I recall 'items' like =
LULL...."What LULL"

the real lozan
01/2/2019
09:59
Dr Dobson, like you I would absolutely love it if they called an EGM. They got away ridiculously lightly at the AGM. To be honest I don't think they would have the balls to call an EGM they would rather just raise a paltry 3m to keep the lights on and cover their salaries and hope there is a miracle on the horizon
panama7
01/2/2019
09:55
P7
If they called an EGM I would turn up and give them a peace of my mind similar to what you did at AGM.
If that PLUM turned up I would love it and could really sweat him out

drdobson1
01/2/2019
09:15
So we know from yesterday's fantastic news which the company were very pleased to announce that we will be needing more funds in a few months. The company can only dilute by 20% of existing shares of 387m so that allows for 77m new shares. Based on today's share price you would expect a fundraising at best of about 5.5p, this would allow the Company to raise a maximimum after costs of about 3.8m, just about enough to keep the lights on and pay the over inflated salaries. Of course the BOD could call an EGM to amend the 20% , would love to see them do that. Based on all that are there still shareholders who think the share price doesn't matter. Just to add there is absolutely nothing on the horizon to transform the share price in the short term.
panama7
31/1/2019
16:30
Kreature, Goodfellow updated the Market today on the 2013trade sale, he stated due to the numerous fundraises since then he has adjusted the many multiples of 34p to a more realistic 50% discount, so that will be 17p. He also took inflation , the pound and Brexit into consideration.
panama7
31/1/2019
16:06
Tosh, glad you brought up Lindy, I think she is part of the problem. As I said previously providing she is given money to carry on her research and is paid a salary I really don't think she is bothered what it costs Shareholders. Don't forget she has had her option targets adjusted a couple of times to negate any dilution. We were originally told Moditope would be ready for human trials in 2016 does anyone think that had she been a full time CSO we would still be waiting for the trial. The fact is Tosh in 6 years not one single timeline has been achieved, they haven't been missed by months but by years.
panama7
Chat Pages: Latest  768  767  766  765  764  763  762  761  760  759  758  757  Older