ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

10.25
0.00 (0.00%)
14 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 10.25 9.50 11.00 10.50 10.00 10.25 1,530,467 14:00:21
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 5.27M -11.94M -0.0129 -7.95 95.1M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 10.25p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 7.65p to 18.125p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £95.10 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -7.95.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 17201 to 17223 of 67475 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  695  694  693  692  691  690  689  688  687  686  685  684  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/8/2018
14:29
Ineptico,
i cast nothing but a light on your lies, deceit, failures, and inadequacies, and far from hate, i enjoy exposing you for what you are.

tosh123
23/8/2018
14:22
Bermuda, you state " In terms of a deal I'm not sure what else could have been done ".
One thing that shouldn't be done is continually raise expectations of Shareholders as the company has done consistently over 5 years. There is absolutely no correlation with the performance of the Company and it's shareprice to the noises that have been coming oyut of the Boardroom for 5 years. I have not got the time to list every contradictory statement of the BOD and primarily Goodfellow over the last 5 years. He has misled Investors over and over again. You only have to read the LSE board to see the difference between expectation and the reality. Investors left out of pocket for 6 years. You also stated earlier that Goodfellow regrets his Frankfurt video. If he regretted it he would have apologised a long time ago, an apology has never been forthcoming which sums up him as a person. Happy to leave ordinary Investors out of pocket while pocketing massive pay rises at everybody elses expense.

panama7
23/8/2018
14:22
LOL

Tosh you cast a web of deceit without any evidence of deceit some how you seem to think i am responsible ... when as we all know that the share did not go to £1 on the day in question thus the £1 on the cards never happened

Fake news ..


The issue you have, does anyone respect you as a poster here and on the LSE

i bet Boom a respected poster, hand on heart would struggle because your entire personality is based on hate ..

so you need others that have been hurt in life Dobson for sure and Lozan

inanaco
23/8/2018
14:15
Not desperate about anything, no one is, apart from you.
Certainly do not want centre stage, far from it, i just dont like you or what you stand for, its that simple.
Until you can demonstrate that you are capable of putting your hands in the air and accepting that you make, and have made mistakes, you're not worth speaking to.

You cannot bully people over here because you dont have the your safety net of getting posts and posters removed.
Hot w1ings took you to task, and really showed you up, so what did you do, yeah thats right, you got her posts and her removed, in the same way that you have done time after time before. You're a spineless coward.
Now please, why dont you just slither back under your rock.

tosh123
23/8/2018
14:04
anyway as we have seen that Tosh is desperate to get centre stage ... must remove all forms off dissent ... wreathgate, press control ? etc etc etc
inanaco
23/8/2018
14:02
you are comparing the debating style .. i said steer .. different LOL
inanaco
23/8/2018
13:59
Inanaco - we have had our 'debates' over the years but honestly 'like T May' ????????!!!!!!! NO, no, no, no, no and no. :)
bermudashorts
23/8/2018
13:52
fair play to you, rather than getting into any dispute you steer a path like T May navigating two opposing factions ...

you don't openly challenge Lozans use of the word Trhype or Tosh's use of extreme risk

you don't challenge personal attacks or take sides ... seems everything posted is acceptable

happy go lucky man ... LOL

inanaco
23/8/2018
13:47
Inanaco

'Boom trying to steer a path'

Can you explain what you mean?

bermudashorts
23/8/2018
13:46
Your lies and your ego are of no benefit what so ever.
So why are you here ?
Just jog on back to whence you came.

tosh123
23/8/2018
13:43
So go away then... Bye Bye
tosh123
23/8/2018
13:34
Ineptico,
you are evidently getting more and more desperate with every post.
Its so funny to see you trying desperately to get involved, even though you claimed that you weren't.
Now run along, theres a good boy.

tosh123
23/8/2018
13:29
Ineptico,
researching the science has stood you in great stead hasn't it.
You've been so far underwater for so long that its diluted any grey matter that you may have been blessed with.
You have no perception of what drives a market, hence your abysmal trading history and your current financial woes.

The difference is, that over here you have no clout because everyone ( or at least most people ) see you for what you are, a liar and a cheat.
You cannot make this forum sing to your tune, and you cannot get posters removed, you're totally powerless.
Just go back to your own BB, your presence here speaks volumes, you must be bored with your brainwashed sheep.
This, unlike the other place, is a Scancell BB, NOT an Ineptico one.

Your Ego doesn't work here. We can see you for what you are, a low life failure.

tosh123
23/8/2018
13:29
Gazza

I have in the past discussed many points, i believe even having to correct you on non science issues, which Boom joined in with as well ... Valuations based on capital expenditure

Boom is well aware of debates we have had on items like share options

taxation

eis schemes
isa schemes

so you cannot restrict my awareness to just the science

any way continue puffing yourself up and discuss all non science based discussions at an intellectual level with Tosh etc.

its amusing at best

Experts in the field

Tosh on Extreme Risk and how to invest

Panama on the BOD failure

Lozan on wood ...

Dobson on chicken

inanaco
23/8/2018
13:18
Inan,

Maybe the people you refer to don't post on the science. But the science is not the only thing to discuss. If you wan't to specialise in that area and research to the level you do, that is fine, that is your perogative. But PLEASE don't DICTATE to people that it is the ONLY topic that they should discuss.

gazza
23/8/2018
13:14
gazza

look if you are happy with present company, Tosh, Lozan Dobson ... to discuss the finer points of the science with which in all the time i have monitored this board i have not seen any posts on that subject from them, its up to you

Boom is ""repeating"" the same posts ref, the market for cancer vaccines after major failures etc. the same debate comes round every month or so

panama repeats the same mantra the BOD is useless

Tosh repeats everything due to indigestion

And Loz year in year out buys his logs but repeats his daily dose of Scams tryhpe etc

are you not bored >> or is your memory so short it needs daily refreshing

you are not protecting the rights to free speech you are giving the fringe of society a platform

inanaco
23/8/2018
13:02
Inan,

who was this directed at?

"your desire to find a past negative's over rides all past and future positive news, "

I certainly have no desire to find past negatives.

gazza
23/8/2018
12:55
But you are getting involved, you're posting, you idiot !
Why dont you just clear off and try to work out why you have been so horribly wrong, rather coming on here and showing your ignorance.

Go and try to see why you've misread everything, and subsequently bought at such the wrong price, and also try to understand what " on the cards " means.

Bye Bye little man.

tosh123
23/8/2018
12:27
gazza

Another question....

Would someone be more likely to invest if they saw:

1. A healthy, balanced BB discussing all the pros and cons, the history, the science, trial results, scientific papers, the potential profit, the potential risks.

or

2. A BB dominated by someone who wants to dictate who can post and what they can discuss?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


agreed that is why i said i would not get involved so carry on pontificating

if you think its of value i am not stopping you

tell you why, the current share price has all this priced in .... as its known.

your desire to find a past negative's over rides all past and future positive news, which is fact

so you want to spend your time """speculating""" the negative IMHO its unreadable

inanaco
23/8/2018
12:16
Lozan,

Yes good point, of course they would.

bermudashorts
23/8/2018
12:15
Panama,

In answer to your 17208, no I'm not suggesting the NDA's added value. What I was trying to say was that I'm not sure what else Tosh expected from RG. Big pharmas like J&J receive literally thousands and thousands of requests each year to review products but they only select a small percentage to look at more closely so only a small no. make it through to actual signing of NDA's.

So at a time when nobody wanted to touch cancer vaccines, RG managed to get his foot through the door and get several NDA's signed. After that the decision is down to the data package and the strategy of the pharma - even if they liked the data, SCIB1 may simply not have fitted in with their pipeline or strategy. So in terms of securing a deal, I'm not sure what else he could have done.

bermudashorts
23/8/2018
12:11
Tosh / BoB...
Would it not be reasonable to think, that with such an 'important subject'...
that other / ALL BoD members might be asked to 'put-in each members 'Iwo peneth' ???
Anyway - Water under the bridge now

the real lozan
23/8/2018
12:10
Boom,
like i said, all speculation, but somewhat believable as it was leaked by someone quite close,there was definitely a massive disagreement between the two of them about how to take the company forward, i have no doubts about that.

Who knows though Boom ?

tosh123
Chat Pages: Latest  695  694  693  692  691  690  689  688  687  686  685  684  Older