yes i did Ruck .... as i have explained the thymus limits avidity close to the limit, t cells still get through at the limit
i have also explained culturing changes avidity ...
I have also explained Low avidity prevents massive clonal expansion by high avidity and competes for the target
scancell induces High Avidity ... a huge difference
what your head is unable to do is accept that ...
not my problem !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Maybe ... but i DID not recommend Bleach
I also did not Recommend AZN vaccine
or Inovio
or MTFB
or HVO
or IMM
or VAL
Or Burble on Immunobody
or Ivy commercial nouse
Or Bermuda on Risk
Or Lozand on Latent heat
or Ruck on statistics
however if you can answer Copyright 2015 ..lets hear it ...
and to this day SC102 still does not understand Immunobody is proven
we also have proof from Covidity
In vivo is a Latin phrase that means "within the living".
Immunobody
Targets antigen presenting cells in vivo to give potent T cell responses, attacking cancer on multiple fronts. Copyright Scancell
No Maybe
No Might work
No Not Proven yet |
"i had to explain to you about High Avidity"What? You didn't think mRNA could elicit high avidity until I posted those links this morning! Lol |
“People are really surprised I understand this stuff,” [Trump] said. “Every one of these doctors said: ‘How do you know so much about this?’ Maybe I have a natural ability.”
Reminds me of someone. |
well answer the question then Mr Gob ?
we can all talk like Turkey .... you just posted as such ...
but in actual context
meaning less ...
and attacking me will not Prove Superiority even with potential Group onslaught
I have 9 processors according to Ruck 🤣 |
so if you want to Prove yourself that you understand RISK
try and answer it ...
No Risk and Synergy Copyright 2015 ......
which one has failed |
180000 shares actually. Just because you are delusional and schizophrenic and the company has made many mistakes, that doesn't mean that a profit cannot be made from here, that, in turn, does not mean there is no risk. It is only in your head that there is nowhere near enough space for the concepts of prospect, risk, appraisal and diligence to all fit at the same time. |
Sci102 - 01 Feb 2025 - 14:00:29 - 17113 of 17352 Scancell - Pot of Gold or POS? - SCLP
Which one has failed?
Well, keytruda is successful beyond any doubt. SCIB1 has been in clinical development for 355 years more or less, to the point where patents have expired. So yeah, scib1 is infinitely closer to failure than Keytruda, why don't you stop asking that stupid question already? |
SC102 ... mr Gobby .......... well he can't answer that
and why did Mr Gobby buy 100,000 shares recently |
many are convinced "no Risk" is wrong ...... same as "all in"
but if you have read the research
how can that be ?
our T cells are proven
ATB
and nobody that declares RISK can answer
"well which one has failed"
since 2015 |
Ivy laid the claim that He understands this industry...
really ?
you guys demand "proven" in trial
but the funny part
in life you are un-proven compared to what you claim
because there are no Stand out "wow" in any post i have seen ...
but you still convince yourself everyone agrees with you !! |
I agree goyathlay...
.
Ruck...I think it's fair to assume if it's calculus they know more than 'most' investors.
But I don't think 'insider knowledge' is of any use anyhow....
And...I did say they don't 'expect' the share price to rise ..
That's because calculus or any other big investor really won't have a clue anyway.
Tykey is always intellectually honest.. |
its you Ruck that laid the claim of being a Data Scientist ...
nobody else diagnosed you ...
but what did you discover ?
an anomaly !! |
Inan will kick off against anyone
really ? Ruck
Mia no
Marcus No
loads of posters don't have a problem
but you and your bully boys try to imprint the market with twisted nonsense
Bermuda Has dumped you and Ivy .. he does not reply to you anymore
but if Bermuda cannot accept any fact presented because he has to "face save"
well that is his problem not mine
he promotes Risk ... but cannot quantify
your problem is not my arrogance but your ignorance
i had to explain to you about High Avidity
you ""COULD NOT DO IT YOURSELF""
and that is YOUR problem
I am doing it for Profit .......... 1.7m shares
posting gives me different avenues of research and considerations
so I did research GSK and Oxford
along with Ivy's company research, which he did not even know about !!!!
but then why would a salesman need to know that |
I would short The Orangutan's and Melon Ears' 'conflict of interest tokens' and Musktard's dodgems.
Let's show some solidarity with this example of cross-border synergy. |
anyway you can't afford a CFD turkey so Fk off |
2tyke, "When a large investor ( with inside knowledge)"You don't know for sure who the large investor is but we suspect it's calculus. Even so, you certainly don't know if they have insider knowledge or not. It's all about intellectual honesty so you keep telling us. Try and show some yourself. |
so when scancell predicted a 90% chance that we could achieve 70% success from 13 to 43 scale
does that affect the calculation ... 3% ?
now
if we have treated 40, 43,43,43,43 in the scope trials different arms
and they work
whats the odds that translates in a 200 patient phase 3 ....approval ?
sales $3.8b
whoever partners i suspect will run an adjuvant trial concurrent ..... which controls the baseline of all high risk melanoma patients
rising to $9billion
Bitcoin ... No dividend dead money |
In the stock market PRICE is king...
It is EVERYTHING...
.
That's 9p...
.
Down 2/3 on successful trials and genmab deals.
.
When a large investor ( with inside knowledge).. |
No non approved...
And your jumping around rubbing your hands together ...thinking you even understand scientific risk...lol
.
We won't even go there with your total ignorance of stock market risk.
As your Bitcoin comment shows....you don't understand prices at all...
.
Rather glad your in your own world with no-one except the bizarre Tf reading....lol |
yes more than £8 a share 🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
i can give you the numbers Turkey
Oncology .............. pass rate 3%
that is 97% of the money invested in cancer research is lost .....or used to develop further understanding
but what is the 3% worth ......? |
as explained "tons of work"
how many approvals ? |
another RNS from Trump ... Chinese tariff
Bitcoin Down
PMSL
no elliots involved |
There's tons of this kind of work going on.
Are you trying to 'convince' yourself of something ? Are you brain-washed ?
.
.
Everything works in theory.. see me things even work (to a degree) in practice.
.
.
You can easily assess 'interest' though ..
Most of the successful scancell trials have been done over the past 2-3 years, including 2/3 deals.
The share price has lost 2/3 of its value....
Things move on. |
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
Hot Features
Premium
