Sareum Share Discussion Threads

[peaceandlove] 07/4/2024 18:48

Is this the same 737 that GSK owned, but didn't want? I think it is 😆🤣 £289million value for a product a big pharmaceutical didn't want and gave it away for nothing. Reason = it's rubbish. That's the trouble with you rampers, you try and influence others to invest when even 1801 hasn't been proven to work. 🤦🏻

[criticalthinker1] 07/4/2024 18:40

? Warn us..upto x amount..care to expand on your post

[bridgedog] 07/4/2024 18:27

P&L

You are quite right. Luckily we already have licensing of the SRA737 which could warn us up to $289m. Glad you are on board.

[criticalthinker1] 07/4/2024 17:59

And don't mention midazolam because the increased use in care homes would be just a total lie....

[peaceandlove] 07/4/2024 08:16

Silverfoil13
Posts: 1,550
Price: 11.50
No Opinion

Changing dynamics of target price6 Apr 2024 13:29

It’s strange how the dynamics of the potential gain on SAR have changed. My ultimate target was always the original Thoth target of £14 which would have been a 23x gain on my original purchase price of 0.60 (1.2p old money). Having had the opportunity to significantly increase my holding at 0.10 I would only need £2.30 to get the 23x gain on those most recent purchases!

Good morning,

This is what cracks me up over on LSE 🙄. Again greedy happy clappers talking nonsense and living in cuckoo land.

Sareum is currently valued at £8.61millon. The poster saying it only needs to go up to £2.30, that means the current MCAP increases to £220,060,111 🤣😆. What these fools don't seem to understand is the reason Sareum went to £5.00 new money is because of the Covid funding and the HNWI. In addition markets and the economy were different in 2021. Hundreds of thousands of small caps were overvalued. Sareum have a phase 1 protocol clinical trial. This is assessing only the basic safety of the new molecule and has nothing to do with whether it will work or not. The only way this goes about £1 is a license deal. No revenue and more dilution on the cards. See you at 5p. 🤦🏻

[wolfofwallstreets] 06/4/2024 17:37

Why are LSE so slow?!

It's a prerequisite for investing in sareum...

Slow and illiterate ..

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 22:41

Parker picking pockets on lse ...oh my...I raised that issue way back

Why are lse so slow?

Parker has had his name removed from atleast one companies ip.

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 22:09

That's a point of conversation that I love.

Dictum meum pactum x

That bond is known and respected.

[wolfofwallstreets] 05/4/2024 21:18

Critical..

Most investors on here can't distinguish between their/there and bought/brought....

The above may as well be Latin..

Like all of your posts since the dawn of time...

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 20:38

Reply to hbd re sogs post

. As shown in Fig. 3A, the combination of AZD1775 and SRA737 resulted in more significant inhibition of cell proliferation/viability as compared to each drug alone, and the effect was most apparent at non-toxic, low doses of AZD1775 (0.19–0.38 μM) and SRA737 (3.13–6.25 μM) for C4-2B cells.

[wolfofwallstreets] 05/4/2024 18:58

A sale of more than 1m apparently yet to show..

Hahahs

[wolfofwallstreets] 05/4/2024 18:38

Aye critical...totally.

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 18:38

Extremely interesting that no one else noting the point re AstraZeneca on lse and 737.
Once again research here is better.
All best Steadydanny 👌

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 18:19

Wolf you do realise that the aspect of individuals who corrupt worthhwhile research are useless eaters?
You are a useless eater.
Why should you exist, what benefits do you bring sincerely.
You have never once justified a point of discussion in a scientific model of discussion.
Do you just dismiss.
What does that name you without a counter point of discussion.
Wolf it is sad but apparent what is what happens to individuals who fail to be polite.
Tyk tok.
Hold your chest.

[peaceandlove] 05/4/2024 18:12

That made me laugh out loud Wolf. I can't understood Critical's posts either. He used to be called Steady Danny over on LSE. They're are in code 😆🤣😂

Have a good weekend mate.

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 17:52

Anyhow. Its happening hence the patents.

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 17:48

Henry is that post at me?

[criticalthinker1] 05/4/2024 17:27

It's not code wolf. Lol. It's basic research into homegrown companies that face adversity via ubiquitous responses

It's a huge rhetoric in revealing who are literally saying they do certain things for shareholders value!

Then change their corporate objectives within a blink of a RNS that is overlooked.

That is why I called back along given the money raised we the 'punters" should request an EGM to ensure that the board (certain individuals) are content or would appreciate an intervention.
I'm sure any polite company such as Sareum would appreciate.

Also I would ask if the HNWIS were so content to invest then personally they could reveal themselves and their affiliations. ...unless of course that is known and revealed...
It's not rocket science when you go through companies House and keep digging.
EFFECTIVELY CRUK AND SAREUM ARE IN DEFAULT OF NOT REPORTING ONGOING RESEARCH WHERE IT IS KNOWN.
THATS A BIG NO NO

[horridhenry] 05/4/2024 17:18

Come on let’s have a comment from Pete,

[wolfofwallstreets] 05/4/2024 17:11

Between horriblenesshenry and his "mong" and "brought" diatribes...and criticalstinker and his posts written in code...I could do without either of them.
But..let them enjoy the day..
Lots more falls to come..

[peaceandlove] 05/4/2024 17:10

You is you Horrid, you absolute narcissistic nutter 🤦🏻