Rockhopper Exploration Share Discussion Threads

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 22:30

Funnily enough ,the head of the international FCA was watching me ,when I posted that Mr Wolfe had moved.All above board son lol.

[trop2] 03/8/2022 22:26

If i wazza rich man, yabbadabbabadabbadoo lol jabba jabba said the monkey to the chimp lol

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 22:20

Don't know .?Go and inform them b8llend lol

[buy2sell1] 03/8/2022 22:14

So taking the Rockhopper share price at say, 7.5p each

Samuel Moody only holds 2,570,729 RKH shares..... worth just £192,804

compare that, with Samuel Moody's basic Rockhopper salary of £341,000 per year

and we drew this conclusion:

Samuel Moody actually takes MORE MONEY OUT OF ROCKHOPPER EVERY YEAR, than he has invested in ROCKHOPPER.



Then we started looking at Samuel Moody's Share Option entitlements in Rockhopper and this too makes very enlighten reading as the table below summarises the RKH share options that he granted to himself.

19 May 2020 granted options over 1,691,048 shares with execise price of 1.00p in May 2021
19 May 2020 granted options over 3,166,666 shares with execise price of 6.25p in May 2023
19 May 2020 granted options over 3,166,667 shares with execise price of 6.25p in May 2024
19 May 2020 granted options over 3,166,667 shares with execise price of 6.25p in May 2025

and we drew this conclusion:

Wouldn't these share options be quite an incentive to spend EVERY SINGLE DAY on message boards like ADVFN and LSE trying to "talk up" the Rockhopper share price, for PERSONAL FINANCIAL GAIN and to feather their own nest.

I wonder what the London Stock Exchange and the Financial Conduct Authority will make of it all ??

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 22:10

The fruitcake has done a 15 hour shift, posting on a company he doesn't have investment in lolWHY would you do that ???Absolutely desperate and NO credible arguments against the project.Just that there's No oil there Eh???Same again tomorrow son.??We have had the best run for years, since you arrived lol

[buy2sell1] 03/8/2022 22:05

So, Mr 12 Aliases has resorted to posting questions and then using another alias to answer that question.



Arlington Chetwynd Talbott posted 26 Jul '22 - 07:51 - 91160 of 91161

"It is a simple risk and reward calculation. I am here to make money under all of my aliases (Nigoil, GOZZIE2, BigSi2, Darloboy, Falklandi, trop2, gaffer73, georgeo1, shanieboy01, Bonehawk".

[arlington chetwynd talbott] 03/8/2022 21:54

warden hodges you and private walker need to remember what corporal jones always says dont panic lol mind how you go pike abingdon

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 21:53

LolPossibly ,but I'm not sure you would move all the family, unless you intended to stay a long while .It just implies they are serious.

[gaffer73] 03/8/2022 21:32

At this rate we'll be able to exercise those warrants next week.

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 21:29

Well he's certainly not moving next to you, if he's any sense lol.

[trop2] 03/8/2022 21:27

Deputy ceo navitas, methinks he's not moving to oldham,rotherham,telford,ramsgate,blackpool,dover lol

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 21:20

The parties don't have to publish the award.This could leak .Rendering of the Award(1) Upon signature by the last arbitrator to sign, the Secretary-General shall promptly:(a) authenticate the original text of the award and deposit it in the archives of the Centre, together with any individual opinions and statements of dissent; and(b) dispatch a certified copy of the award (including individual opinions and statements of dissent) to each party, indicating the date of dispatch on the original text and on all copies.(2) The award shall be deemed to have been rendered on the date on which the certified copies were dispatched.(3) The Secretary-General shall, upon request, make available to a party additional certified copies of the award.(4) The Centre shall not publish the award without the consent of the parties. The Centre shall, however, promptly include in its publications excerpts of the legal reasoning of the Tribunal.

[bonehawk] 03/8/2022 21:12

Nine tomorrow.

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 20:51

The deputy ceo of navitas has moved with his wife and children to Western Europe from Israel, including schooling them here, to secure finance and to sort out contractors. Would he do that if he wasn't confident of success. ??This project will happen, as long as oil prices remain as they are .

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 20:46

The OM decision must be given in under 20 days, unless an unlikely extension of another 60.Not rocket science.  From 2012-2022, we estimate that Premier and Rockhopper spent in excess of US$300m on engineering and other non-drilling work relating to the Sea Lion project. Navitas and Rockhopper plan to build on this very significant bank of knowledge to create a lower cost development, potentially based around a re-deployed FPSO with fewer wells being drilled pre first oil. Given the amount of engineering already done, the timing is likely to be driven largely by interaction with the vendor community, most notably in finding a suitable FPSO, and the time taken to progress the financing.  Having said this, the target is to reach FID in 2023 or 2024 and to then have formal project sanction as early in 2024 as possible.

[shanieboy01] 03/8/2022 20:38

Could someone sensible here set out a brief timeline going forward

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 20:28

People selling to pay the gas bill lolNo, the share price is trending slowly north as new investors see the massive upside here, but it's tempered by cheap 7p share sellers taking a small % profit.

[trop2] 03/8/2022 20:24

Nah, meet the grumas, oldem ali

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 20:16

I've never lost you b8llend .I only started investing after the crash .It was impossible to lose.A monkey throwing darts at the stockpage could have made money ???What's that you did Eh????M#ppett lol

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 20:13

Not possible. It's closed FACT

[melegramforttongo] 03/8/2022 20:10

You gotta laugh at frustrated gambling Gozzie locked in - key thrown away at 88pence ..
These timescales don’t surprise me tbh ..
Gozzie probably thinks it should only take a few weeks tops
😂😂😂😂8514;😂ԅ14;😂
These guys , these habitual losing guys , they crack me up 😂 😂😂😂😂8514;😂ԅ14;😂😂;😂😂😂😂
28514;😂€514;😂㈳4;

[buy2sell1] 03/8/2022 19:46

5+ years for a complex Arbitration case involving I.C.S.I.D is far from unreasonable.

I.C.S.I.D arbitrators have had to obtain evidence from both the Italian Government and from Rockhopper Exploration PLC including making site visits, before convening and giving their Final Decision.

Throw in delays caused by the Covid pandemic and a backlog of open cases, and that probably explains the lengthy time frame, but constantly whinging and moaning about it, won't speed up the decision making process.

It is also worth remembering that any I.C.S.I.D decision might still be contested resulting in further delays and further appeals.

[gozzie2] 03/8/2022 18:48

To have the arbitration go on for nearly 6 years and not decide in favour of rockhopper,even for a minimul amount ,would be ludicrous. Italy has lost on every appeal. 22 August 2019We are pleased to announce that the ICSID tribunal in Rockhopper Italia SpA, Rockhopper Mediterranean Ltd, and Rockhopper Exploration Plc v Italian Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/17/14) rejected Italy's objections to jurisdiction in an interim award.We are funding Rockhopper's claims against Italy for breaches of the investment protections provided by the Energy Charter Treaty (the ECT) in relation to Rockhopper's investment in the Ombrina Mare oil and gas field located off the Italian coast in the Adriatic Sea.Italy had objected to the tribunal's jurisdiction primarily on the grounds that the ECT's arbitration provisions cannot apply to intra-EU disputes, i.e., where the dispute is between an EU Member State and an investor of another EU Member State."The tribunal's rejection of the so-called intra-EU objection was unanimous", notes Dominic Afzali "and its decision was consistent with each of the known prior decisions of tribunals considering the intra-EU objection in investment arbitrations to date. The case should now proceed to a consideration of merits and damages."