Quadrise Fuels Share Discussion Threads

[haggismchaggis] 28/7/2022 19:07

The spread only matters if you're a very short term trader, the real money is long term with this stock, and in that sense the spread today is meaningless, as you'll be selling in a year for 30p plus (that would be £422m MCap, which if all goes well with fuel trials should be on the cards). The spread today could be 50%, who cares if you plan sell in a year at 30p plus????

If you want narrow spreads go look at FTSE-100 stocks, not a small cap worth just £21m. This won't be a short term traders stock for another 6 months, when it might start getting some volatility that beats the spread.

[zico01] 28/7/2022 19:02

What i'm saying to you is very simple.
MM's had far too much shares so they were selling them at below mid price.Thus the buys were showing as sells.

Towards the close of session having cleared most the excess shares they increased the offer to 1.47p , 1.49p and finally to 1.50p full offer price.

You obviously being more cleverer than the average shorter will understand that.

[kreature] 28/7/2022 18:39

Plenty paid 1.8p yesterday to enable the selling. So if you're telling me that yes means no and sell means buy, then yes it looks very rosy here well done

[grupo] 28/7/2022 17:22

not happy with the spread

8pc plus according to advfn

can anyone confirm

[zico01] 28/7/2022 17:21

If you were watching the trades you would know that more than 75% of the reported sells today were actually buys.

From your post above 'Looks like readers are taking your advice on that one' you are clearly wrong.

A 1 million buy at full offer price of 1.50p at the close indicates MM's have sold most of the shares from yesterdays sell off after the rns.

[kreature] 28/7/2022 16:55

'People can sell as much as they like'

Looks like readers are taking your advice on that one

[hazl] 28/7/2022 15:48

People can sell as much as they like .
Now that we have had such a great RNS showing MSC is on board and encouraging more carriers I am happy to wait.


Doesn't even need a lot of posts.
But you ccan bet the ignorant naysayers will worry unless they do.
Which shows they fear it will go up unless they post,to me.

[tongosti] 28/7/2022 14:24

Andromeda is the nearest galaxy to ours.

[tongosti] 28/7/2022 14:23

I hear there is interest in Andromeda for AirMsar

[kreature] 28/7/2022 12:30

Didn't it take around 6 or 7 years from proof of concept to not getting the LONO last time ?

[haggismchaggis] 28/7/2022 11:54

Buys still showing as sells because the live quotes right now are:
ASK 1.459
BID 1.4255

[haggismchaggis] 28/7/2022 11:53

Courtesy of DustOfNations on the LSE BB. Makes very interesting reading.

[sarkasm] 28/7/2022 10:20

ALL VAGUE AS TEST RESULTS MIGHT not BE KNOWN TO WELL INTO 2023

unless other testers come to the fray to give speed

In the mean time, what are the various competitors doing

[kreature] 28/7/2022 10:13

Perhaps they should delete the email tbf. Or retract it or something ?

[kreature] 28/7/2022 10:08

Good that they are going ahead with a test considering the MSC email that Brook posted here in May. So I am happy about that.....

'For the moment, MSAR as emulsified fuel where water and heavy fuel oil are blended to make a fuel in order to lower emissions, also produces less power in the engine, which we are sure you are aware of, and does not make it ideal in the competitive actual market'

[hazl] 28/7/2022 10:07

Again I refer you to this they need to know what MSC is doing!

[hazl] 28/7/2022 10:04

I think it's no wonder MSC chose QFI looking at the above.
We compare very favourably with their worries.

Source was the Baltic Dry Index.

[hazl] 28/7/2022 10:02

For those serious investors amongst us do look at this.
The shipping industry is very worried about the future demands likely put on them.
The speed is likely to be affected they say,cargo sizes and....

'In his presentation, Sbraga gave a snapshot of the anticipated impact of the EEXI and CII regulations on contracts and the disputes landscape going forward. He noted that the impact is expected to be “most profound” on charterparty contracts.'





Home
Shipping News
Commodities
Report / Analysis
Oil & Energy
World Economy
Stock Market News

Home / Shipping News / International Shipping News / Contractual chaos of emissions regs
Contractual chaos of emissions regs

in International Shipping News,Shipping: Emission Possible 16/07/2022
Is there a misalignment between incentives to improve carbon intensity? That was the question posed by Alessio Sbraga, a partner in HFW’s shipping department in London, at a recent joint Baltic Exchange and Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers webinar.

Sbraga told attendees that the commercial consequences of emission reduction measures such as the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) and the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) are “counterintuitive”.

In his presentation, Sbraga gave a snapshot of the anticipated impact of the EEXI and CII regulations on contracts and the disputes landscape going forward. He noted that the impact is expected to be “most profound” on charterparty contracts.

EEXI is a technical measure aimed at improving energy efficiency of the existing design of vessels and consequently reducing the energy output of existing vessels. The CII is an operational requirement used to measure the carbon intensity of the commercial activities of a vessel on an annual basis.

“It’s vital to have a basic understanding of what these requirements amount to in order to understand the potential contractual disputes landscape,” Sbraga said.

He described CII as “complicated and contractually invasive for commercial parties”. Under CII, a vessel’s carbon intensity will be generated with an annual CII rating from A to E. A ‘C’ rating is effectively the minimum required, while a vessel rated ‘D’ for three consecutive years, or rated ‘E’ in any single year, will be required to develop a plan of corrective action to achieve CII compliance.

Achieving the CII target is not expected to be straightforward and will likely require vessels to change the way they operate to be more efficient, but not necessarily commercially efficient. “What this means is that it’s very likely that operational adjustments in real time to the vessel’s commercial operation will be required,” Sbraga said. Examples of these adjustments include reducing speed, reducing cargo volume intake, increasing distance sailed or deviating from the shortest or quickest route.

[hazl] 28/7/2022 09:50

Lastly....

'Having completed successful laboratory and pilot-scale testing at our Quadrise Research Facility (“QRF”) during 2020, we are now working with industry partners, including Aquafuel and VTT, to both test bioMSAR™ in diesel engine and combustion applications, and source commercial supplies of glycerine.'

Q source.

[haggismchaggis] 28/7/2022 09:48

I sent JM a couple of e-mails yesterday, one to congratulate QFI on the MSC news, another later on with an interesting news item I found (Biofuel related). On the first email I got an OOO reply, but JM usually gets back later just to say thanks, so I get the feeling he's possibly running silent, which could mean something is brewing. I guess we'll find out soon enough.

[hazl] 28/7/2022 09:48

'Low cost implementation – an LNG conversion requires new, highly expensive cryogenic storage and liquefaction systems. In comparison, bioMSAR™ can be implemented cheaply using existing HFO infrastructure.'

EXISTING HFO infrastructure.

[hazl] 28/7/2022 09:46

' The existing diesel engine fuel pumps and injectors worked well with bioMSAR™.

The bioMSAR™ test utilised 5 tons of bioMSAR™ manufactured at the Quadrise Research Facility, formulated with the intention of achieving a 20% CO2 reduction and the results presented are in comparison to diesel at 75% load, which is a typical operating regime for a marine 4-stroke diesel (testing range of 50% to 90% load).'
Source Quadrise Fuels International

Hellenic shipping news.

[kreature] 28/7/2022 09:30

"THEY DON'T NEED AN ENGINE MANUFACTURER!"

What are you talking about? Of course they need an engine manufacturer. You think the warranty and insurance on the engine will be valid if you put any fuel in the engine ? Plus. "certain modifications" need to be made to the engine just to run msar. But perhaps the initial 'tests' don't involve using the engine ??

[kreature] 28/7/2022 09:24

Hmmm, sells going through at 1.42 hazl....and share price down on the week and down on the month. So not sure where the 'surge' is that proactive mention. Did they mean surge downward ? Nevertheless I'll reconsider after the next funding round. ATB