Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[superbarnet] 07/8/2017 21:25

This is gathering momentum and is getting good press and tips.

[ny boy] 07/8/2017 19:14

Dolphin158,

You sound a knowledgeable sort, are you invested in this one, despite the reporting misdemeanours, in your opinion has his company got a future, are they well funded etc

Just come across this one, so haven't had a chance to do too much yet. Tks in advance

[scrutable] 07/8/2017 18:49

warwick you are being so obnoxious with your premature boasting of PHE's inevitable success, contempt for those who are more cautious, and obsession with toilet effluents to flavour your diatribes, that dozens will welcome your financial failure when and if it comes as is is more likely than not.

We can all repeat assertions until they appear to reflect the truth. so I will repeat my own assertion that you are dangerous, reckless, irresponsible, and somewhat stupid. It will be a slight consolation for our own self-inflicted loss.

Beware of Hubris if you know what it is. It has destroyed many greater than you.

[beeezzz] 07/8/2017 17:17

deccer1...posted earlier....see link

This from the Tees Valley debacle....this is 350k tpa plant not much greater than the 330k tpa you have been referencing that are working, not sure this correct.

"ENDS reported that tests had been blowing “big holes” in the ceramic lining of the gasifier stack. Although parts were taken from the second project to fix up TV1, this wasn’t successful. In a statement released in early April, GMB, the union for engineering construction workers, blamed the “company’s incompetence” for the site closures."

[deccer1] 07/8/2017 13:22

Its interesting you say a Westinghouse system was terminated at Tees Valley. Any idea why? From the information in the public domain both plasma gasification and PHE's G3 system seem to avoid producing dioxins, furans and tar and both are environmentally friendly. So maybe which system prevails will come down to economics and other technical details?

[deccer1] 07/8/2017 13:14

beeezzz #4713
i previously provided a link direct to Westinghouse's website detailing their 3000 degree plasma gasification system.

My Asia comment came i think from something i read some time ago on Waste2tricity's website about them working with Westinghouse plasma for rollout in Asia, and reading somewhere Westinghouse were already running systems in Japan China and india.

I now see Waste2tricity have updated their website to say "Previously working with Westinghouse Plasma and now with a selection of alternative technology providers, W2T are exploring opportunities in SE Asian countries," I was unaware of this development when i wrote the Westinghuse comment.

[beeezzz] 07/8/2017 12:25

W9

Was it a bit hot hot hot....Scorchio....

[beeezzz] 07/8/2017 11:52

decc1.....

You didn't answer the ?, when you stated "Westinghouse Gasification" had already cornered the market, yet the same system failed at Tees Valley project.

Where have they got a plant actually working, maybe this won't work on massive scale and PHE have had to go smaller to work, not sure how they came up with a 25tpd plant having not tested it yet.

warwick...Do try to relax a bit, you'll give yourself a heart attack, and won't be able to spend all your profits...ha ha

[pyglet] 07/8/2017 11:16

Fascinating watching this spat.
If anyone new starts looking at this board for the first time its' so obvious which side anyone would come down on should they start looking to invest in this stock should they have the urge.

[dolphin158] 06/8/2017 22:42

Do not lie, Yet again and I do so that it is on record for you and FCA , I am not employed by anybody in the city and no financial institution.

As you continually try to deflect my valid questions by throwing your false allegations I will continue to post about the company.

You are making yourself look the prize prat with the FCA with your false allegations. I will just point them at all the financial reporting errors.

All companies on AIM are required to comply with Aim Rule26 which includes having to keep the last three years accounts on its website for users to access.


My question is where is the 2015 audited accounts as they are missing? These are the accounts which were issued after the first ones had to be withdrawn for containing numerous errors. The website has an invalid set of accounts on there and not the amended 2015 accounts.

Yet another error? Why would a company fail to comply with Aim Rule26 when it specifically has a committee to ensure it complies with the Aim rules?

[dolphin158] 06/8/2017 21:19

So you don't mislead other users of this board with your lies I will yet again post on here as s permanent record; I am a private investor who posts on here and do not receive any financial consideration for doing do, I do not have a current short in this or any other share and have never shorted any share, I am not employed by any Market maker nor financial institution.

Warwick posts his lies as I have shown the company to be filing accounts which contained errors and had to be withdrawn and reissued.

I have highlighted the 2016 interim accounts as containing errors for example note 5.

I have highlighted that the company has filed share allotment forms since December 2015 with errors in them. I was shown to be correct as the company issued amended firms in May 2017. Unfortunately these also contained errors.

I highlight that the company had failed to file a director's appointment form for David Ryan Again I was proved correct when the company eventually filed the firm weeks late.

I highlighted last week that the 2016 audited accounts had only been received by Companies House on 18 July 2017 as shown by the date stamp bar code on the front cover. Again I highlighted that the company is required to file it's accounts within 6 months of its accounting reference date, by 30 June 2017..

So who has been misleading the public?