We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plexus Holdings Plc | LSE:POS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0MDF233 | ORD 1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 6.90 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.80 | 7.00 | ||||
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil & Gas Field Machy, Equip | 12.72M | 2.93M | 0.0278 | 2.48 | 7.27M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 6.90 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19/3/2025 | 16:30 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Retail Offer |
| 19/3/2025 | 14:36 | ALNC |  *Plexus may raise up to GBP500,000 more via retail offer |
| 19/3/2025 | 14:30 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Result of Placing and Posting of Circular & NOM |
| 19/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Proposed Placing, Subscription and Retail Offer |
| 09/12/2024 | 14:00 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Result of AGM |
| 09/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc AGM Statement |
| 15/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Posting of Report & Accounts & Notice of AGM |
| 14/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Middle East Exploration Well Order |
| 22/10/2024 | 12:43 | ALNC | Plexus swings to annual profit amid increased contract momentum |
| 22/10/2024 | 06:05 | UK RNS | Plexus Holdings Plc Loan Agreements Update |
Plexus (POS) Share Charts1 Year Plexus Chart |
|
1 Month Plexus Chart |
Intraday Plexus Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19/3/2025 | 22:49 | Plexus Holdings 2022 - Wellhead Systems for Oil and Gas Engineering | 1,837 |
| 19/3/2025 | 21:42 | What can be, unburdened by what has been | 2,573 |
| 13/2/2025 | 13:47 | POS - Teh plan | 10,015 |
| 11/1/2025 | 16:25 | Plexus POS (with Charts) - A green play on Oil and Gas ?! | 87 |
| 04/8/2024 | 09:21 | The juvenile jumped up no mark thread part 2 | 4 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-19 16:29:00 | 6.90 | 10,000 | 690.00 | O |
| 2025-03-19 16:24:10 | 6.70 | 144,404 | 9,675.07 | O |
| 2025-03-19 16:18:30 | 6.99 | 28 | 1.96 | O |
| 2025-03-19 16:03:54 | 6.90 | 15,000 | 1,035.00 | O |
| 2025-03-19 15:31:06 | 6.93 | 43,192 | 2,991.05 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 19/3/2025 08:20 by Plexus Daily Update Plexus Holdings Plc is listed in the Oil & Gas Field Machy, Equip sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker POS. The last closing price for Plexus was 6.70p.Plexus currently has 105,386,239 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Plexus is £7,271,650. Plexus has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 2.48. This morning POS shares opened at 6.75p |
Posted at 19/3/2025 15:30 by avatar333 I have just clicked on the wrong POS thread and got this message (I access the FreeBB via )Confirm Private Investor Status Before providing access to Real Time RNS, ADVFN must confirm that you meet the criteria for a Private Investor. Please read the following statements and confirm whether or not you meet the criteria. The recipient obtains access to the Information in a personal capacity; The recipient is not required to be regulated or supervised by a body concerned with the regulation or supervision of investment or financial services; The recipient is not currently registered or qualified as a professional securities trader or investment adviser with any national or state exchange, regulatory authority, professional association or recognised professional body; The recipient does not currently act in any capacity as an investment adviser, whether or not they have at some time been qualified to do so; The recipient uses the Information solely in relation to the management of their personal funds and not as a trader to the public or for the investment of corporate funds; and The recipient does not distribute, republish or otherwise provide any Information or Derived Works to any third party in any manner or use or process Information or Derived Works for any commercial purpose. |
Posted at 19/3/2025 08:33 by vikeshm1 Think it should be noted paulypilot has millions of shares and must have lost a packet as he was telling all 13p was a great price to buy. So he will obs be a cheerleader. He will always be positive here and Trombone is likely right numbers will be terrible and the broker is paid 2 be positive surely. |
Posted at 19/3/2025 07:49 by paulypilot Good morning! I can't tell you how relieved I am that funding sorted out. Had a zoom with mgt last night, and the relaunch of the rental side of the business is very exciting. Strong demand, they're turning away business. Products greatly improved during the lock-out period (now ended), giving POS competitive advantage.Revised Cavendish note showing b/even next year FY 6/2026 is based on expanding rental fleet, with rapid payback, based on validated sales pipeline, not just hope! They can't say anything about the £9m special project, but client confidentiality ends in July 2025, when they'll be shouting from the rooftops about what a stunning project this was, which enabled a large client to make massive cost savings. I think this is a turning point, and I accept (sadly) some dilution, but far from a disaster. The open offer is a decent size, as they want to look after the private investor following. I think share price now underpinned at a lowly 6.5p anyway, so more upside than downside from here on, IMO. DYOR as usual obviously;. Regards, Paul. |
Posted at 09/3/2025 14:47 by bloomberg2 Plexus Holdings PLC ('Plexus' or 'the Company') Development of a Replacement Tubing Hanger Neck Seal ("HG-R") for workover applications Plexus Holdings PLC, the AIM quoted oil and gas engineering services business and owner of the proprietary POS-GRIP® friction-grip method of wellhead engineering, known for its time and cost saving capabilities, is pleased to announce that it has successfully completed a customer sponsored R&D project to develop a bespoke lifetime leak-proof replacement tubing hanger neck seal assembly ('HG-R'), to upgrade and extend the field life of existing surface production wellheads. Plexus' HG-R technology has been designed to address a key challenge facing oil and gas production operators, namely, the systemic failure of conventional annular seals, as a result of pressure and temperature induced interface movement, known as fretting. Particularly on natural gas applications, it can be statistically shown that most conventional wellhead annular and neck seals will at some point fail, causing integrity and safety concerns, which may result in environmental consequences, costly repairs, and lost production. In the case of tubing hanger neck seals, maintenance intervention involves externally applied temporary injection procedures, or the substitution of leaking seal components and perhaps even the replacement of worn out tubing hangers and tubing heads. It should be recognised that external seal injection services are generally provided by several international specialists and a host of local maintenance providers, who work with unregulated proprietary injection materials for which positive results are claimed, although the service invariably comes with warnings that integrity is temporary because injected seals are subject to the same dynamics that caused the original seals to fail. Plexus' bespoke HG-R maintenance intervention solutions are exclusively available from Plexus Ocean Systems Ltd and its licensees and are scientifically based on Hertzian Stress Theory, and which in respect of interface stress management features match what we believe to be the unrivalled capabilities of Plexus' "HG" lifetime guaranteed annular seals. Commenting on this new Plexus Product, Plexus' CEO Ben Van Bilderbeek said: "The HG-R R&D design project is in line with our long-standing ambition to supply the oil and gas industry with a portfolio of NetZero compliant sealing solutions, which, in addition to our lifetime guaranteed wellheads, can in certain instances be used to upgrade and make secure decade-old production systems. Importantly, this new bespoke solution allows permanent upgrades to be carried out as part of planned "workover" activities for existing wells, without having to remove tubing hangers. This means ageing wellheads can be safely and affordably repaired, to address future neck seal failures, which in turn lengthens their economic life, reduces the periodic cost of maintenance, and helps hydrocarbons maintain the role as a responsible transition fuel, until the world can rely on alternative energy sources. We will be actively marketing this new product and look forward to reporting further progress" |
Posted at 20/2/2025 23:19 by rambutan2 Piece on methane leakage on bloomberg recently which highlights the opportunity another company sees in the States. I wonder whether POS tech would benefit them in any way? But can't make any sort of judgement/guess as I just don't know enough about exactly what POS IP does offer. And are highly doubtful as to whether POS really are seriously looking at the methane opportunity rather than just talking about it. |
Posted at 17/2/2025 09:09 by avatar333 Good morning, Barry.5 at the moment, I note. AVATAR333 - 09 Dec 2024 - 15:35:37 - 9117 of 10016 POS - Teh plan - POS I note that I currently have 3 (three) lighters on the go. Best to be on the safe side, I suppose. |
Posted at 25/1/2025 15:54 by rmillaree Perhaps Scotties involvement here from the outset is the thing which may ultimately destroy the companywhat a ridiculouslystupid statement - how has Paul's investment changed how then business is or will be run. Perhaps one can say if he has piled in and others have "make their decision" to also invest - that would have given the company an opportunity to raise finance at better price. The simple fact here is that company had a purple patch - it may have signed contracts which kept that purple patch going - that didnt happen and they now forecast chunky losses - but may siogn decent contracts again anytime soon. To me the share price tredn has pretty clearly followed teh newsflow in both directions - its beyond nonsensical to suggest Paul may have destroyed the compay. Infcat your comments may be slanderous and if i were you i would suggest winding your neck back in with regard to your ridiculous comments. Hey ho we have free speech - please be careful though when quoting nonsense. |
Posted at 23/11/2024 10:42 by michaelg1 Any avatars use ChatGPT? I must say I am mightily impressed with it (having sat through some uses of it at teh away days last week).[...] I reckon this is going to help me with some of my graft - I asked it a tricky question I am being asked to peer review on and it came out with a pretty amazing response: Removing a shareholder expense subsidy from a with-profits business can have significant implications in terms of regulatory notification and requirements. Here are the key considerations: 1. Impact on Policyholders and Fair Treatment Policyholder Interests: With-profits policies are designed to share the financial performance of the business between policyholders and shareholders. If the shareholder expense subsidy is removed, it could result in a reduction of the benefits that are shared with policyholders, as the business may need to increase charges or reduce payouts to make up for the loss of subsidy. Regulators will be concerned about whether policyholders are treated fairly. Fairness and Transparency: Regulators (such as the Prudential Regulation Authority in the UK or equivalent bodies in other jurisdictions) will want to ensure that any change to the cost-sharing arrangements is transparent and does not disadvantage policyholders unfairly. You would typically need to demonstrate that the removal of the subsidy is in the best interests of policyholders, or at least does not harm them. 2. Regulatory Notification Requirements Notification to Regulators: Depending on the jurisdiction, removing a shareholder expense subsidy could be seen as a material change in the nature of the business or the way in which the costs are allocated. This might trigger a requirement to notify the regulators. In the UK, for instance, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) would be involved in such a decision if it affects policyholders or the solvency position of the company. Changes in Financial Position: If the change affects the financial position of the business (e.g., increasing the costs to policyholders or the capital required to maintain solvency), the company would need to report these changes in its regular supervisory reports (e.g., Solvency II reports in Europe, or equivalent). Actuarial Certification: In many jurisdictions, removing a subsidy could require an actuarial certification that the changes are in line with regulatory expectations, especially regarding the fair treatment of policyholders. The company's actuary may need to assess whether the change could affect the financial outlook of the with-profits fund. 3. Changes to the With-Profits Fund Structure Fund Management: With-profits funds are often structured with a balancing mechanism between shareholders and policyholders. Removing the subsidy could alter the fund's overall cost structure and affect the balance of returns between policyholders and shareholders. Regulators will want to understand how the fund will continue to operate with these changes and whether policyholder interests are still adequately protected. Governance and Oversight: Changes that impact the fairness or structure of the with-profits fund may also require changes to the governance arrangements. The with-profits committee (if applicable) may need to be consulted, and the regulators may require an updated report on the committee’s views. 4. Impact on Capital Requirements Solvency and Capital Adequacy: If the removal of the subsidy impacts the financial stability of the with-profits fund, this could affect the company's solvency position and may need to be disclosed. The change could alter the capital required to ensure the business remains solvent, and regulatory capital requirements may need to be recalculated and communicated. 5. Policyholder Communications Information to Policyholders: While this is not strictly a regulatory notification requirement, regulators will expect the company to properly inform policyholders about any changes that might affect their policies, including the removal of a shareholder expense subsidy. The company may be required to provide clear communication about how the change will impact policyholders, especially if it affects the benefits they receive or the charges they incur. Notification of Material Changes: If the removal of the subsidy is deemed a material change to the terms of the policy or the nature of the with-profits business, regulators may require the company to formally notify policyholders and seek their consent, depending on the specifics of the change and the jurisdiction. 6. Potential for Review or Consultation Regulatory Scrutiny: Given the potential impact on policyholders, regulators may want to review the decision or conduct a consultation. This is particularly relevant if the removal of the subsidy leads to significant changes in policyholder benefits or charges. Approval Process: Depending on the magnitude of the change, regulators might require a formal approval process before the changes can be implemented. This could involve submitting a detailed report on the rationale behind the decision, its impact on policyholders, and any mitigation measures. Conclusion Removing a shareholder expense subsidy from a with-profits business could have significant implications for both policyholders and the regulatory landscape. It is important to carefully consider the fairness of the change, the potential financial impact, and the regulatory requirements for notifying and consulting with relevant authorities. Proper documentation, transparency, and communication with both regulators and policyholders are crucial in ensuring compliance and maintaining trust. |
Posted at 18/11/2024 17:29 by disc0dave46 I've posted up facts from the Stocko small cap reports. It's not idle speculation at all. Paul had POS as "Green" even before their their March interims and it's now "Amber / Red". When "Green" it had previously also issued material uncertainty when I'm assuming Paul had a smaller position (will correct that if not accurate), so no difference to now even with holding 3.2%.My overall point is it should never been "Green" the risks were still very much in view following fund raises and material uncertainties, the significant down grade by Paul was overdue and as I posted, IMO its Red all day long. A pure punt / gamble nothing more. No offence to Paul but I'mnot swayed by his bias to put my hard earned in here and that's my choice, as is anybodys that does buy. I took on board Paul's optimism but not buying it predominantly due to the BoD's actions. |
Posted at 16/10/2024 10:44 by barry evans Good morning AVATAR333 and el.Report a post Poster: elpirata Thread Title: POS - Teh plan Post Excerpt: good latemorn avatars Please fill in the form below to submit a review of the post. Reason for reporting: Off-topic Comments(optional) (No HTML and 500 Character Limit): |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
