ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

PCF Pcf Group Plc

0.95
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Pcf Group Plc LSE:PCF London Ordinary Share GB0004189378 ORD 5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.95 0.60 1.30 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Pcf Share Discussion Threads

Showing 5326 to 5349 of 5625 messages
Chat Pages: 225  224  223  222  221  220  219  218  217  216  215  214  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
20/9/2022
13:50
Nothing coming, it seems.

""""Such announcement must now be made by Castle not later than 5.00pm on 20 September 2022. This deadline can be extended by the Board of PCF with the consent of the Takeover Panel in accordance with Rule 2.6(c) of the Code"""".

So, let's get on with the capital injection, please.

dandigirl
20/9/2022
08:33
So, nothing this morning.
What’s it to be then?
Surely time to move on.

dandigirl
15/9/2022
13:06
Market seems to price a deal as very low probability . I suspect Castle will walk away, unable to come to agreement . Statement will likely point to conversations with other suitors , and so it goes on .
goddamitmaverick
14/9/2022
09:01
Three more business days to the next deadline.
dandigirl
08/9/2022
22:48
What a way to treat non-SOMERS shareholders.
dandigirl
08/9/2022
21:43
Agreed too long and it a not a good sign, suggests differences . Why pay for deposits when you don’t have capital to support more lending ? Non competitive rates should be at least 1.50% given BoE pays 1.75% and gteed to rise. What a way to treat customers .
goddamitmaverick
07/9/2022
12:19
4 months to look at the business and the books is too long.

Especially when the accounts have been audited in what I would assume is a robust fashion.

I'm not sure what the length of time means. Does it mean Castle are serious or does it mean they aren't?

In my mind it's taking too long and must be using up time, energy and costs from both parties. By now I would have expected a conclusion one way or another.

Or is it that the parties are trying to come to an agreed recommendation to shareholders and there's a gap. A gap would not surprise me given Somers are on one end of the transaction.



Meanwhile PCF are back to not really wanting customer savings again. 3.1% for 3 years for new savers only available account. Maturing accounts are only competitive for 5 years and offering 0.99% for 2 years is good business if you can get it. I'm getting more than that on instant access

cc2014
07/9/2022
08:51
Yup, I saw that. We will see.:)
dandigirl
07/9/2022
03:19
Dandi: "The Board of PCF Group plc ("PCF" or the "Company") announces that it is in early-stage discussions with Castle Trust Capital plc ("Castle"), in relation to a possible all share offer for the entire issued and to be issued shares of the Company (the "Possible Offer"). Under the terms of the Possible Offer, it is expected that PCF shareholders would have a small minority position in the combined group."
hopespr1ngseternal
06/9/2022
23:19
So nothing definite then.

My view is that it is the listing that Castle covets and the tie-up will be engineered to retain this by way of a reverse takeover.

It is this that more than likely is taking the time for surely it shouldn’t take this long to agree commercial terms.

Satisfying regulators and the listing authority can take the many weeks that have passed since the possibility was first announced several months ago.

I think we are now in the fourth month. It is now another 2 weeks to the next deadline.

Let us remember that SOMERS are PE too and doubtless will want out at some time.

dandigirl
06/9/2022
21:31
Dandi: Castle Trust is unlisted. If PCF becomes a wholly owned subsidiary of Castle via an all share takeover we will no longer own shares in PCF but in Castle Trust which is unlisted. I think this may. be one reason why PCF is trading at a price which looks absurdly low. That said I would rather have a small holding in a profitable bank than a larger holding in a bank that has insufficient capital even though I will have to wait patiently for Flowers to secure an exit via a listing or a sale. As no doubt will Somers.
hopespr1ngseternal
06/9/2022
19:22
.. as, if unlisted, how would PE exit?
dandigirl
06/9/2022
19:20
hopes: where does it say that the new group would be unlisted please?
dandigirl
06/9/2022
17:04
Goddamit we have already been told that the transaction if it goes ahead will be all shares and will leave pcf shareholders with a small minority stake in the combined unlisted group - but with a principal shareholder who will be looking for an exit over time as that is what private equity does.
hopespr1ngseternal
06/9/2022
16:49
Good luck. I think a deal is coming but probably shares not cash and will they take PCF private making it illiquid? Anything above 6p looks like a deal now with losses running freely. Another bid may make CT hurry up and decide and realise there are alternatives.
goddamitmaverick
02/9/2022
08:35
Maverick: Plenty of reasons not to buy.

Anyway, bought some this a.m. at 2.79.

Had a little cash available

Have bought in several lots in recent days to average down to just over 12.

Looking forward to hearing news soon.

Why does everything at PCF seem to take forever?

dandigirl
02/9/2022
07:43
#4191

What you are missing is the lack of capital you refer to in post 4190.

PCF has enough regulatory captial to keep going at its present size and given enough time it will sort its problems out and turn a profit and the 3p may be considered cheap.

The issue is that the size of the regulatory capital is linked to PCF's profitability and PCF has no ability to withstand signficant losses without that resulting in a reduction in the loan book.

We are heading into a consumer shock this winter over the cost of living due to inflation/mortgate costs/energy costs. It is hard to see PCF's impairment number not rising. Also, given the increase in cost of capital due to higher interest rates, it's hard not to see their NIM not being under significant pressure.


All this is true regardless of whether Castle buy PCF or PCF bumbles along as it is. Sure, if Castle buy it I'm sure they can strip out some costs but are they enough to overcome what is surely going to be on-going losses for some considerable time. And would Castle get it for a much lower price in a years time?

cc2014
01/9/2022
20:21
Offered at 3p now.So CT clock is ticking and surely their final chance to deal or no deal. The right buyer would move quickly and decisively and make provision for claw back of any undisclosed or undiscovered nasties. I’m almost tempted to stick in a 2 1/2 p bid . Pretty sure you’ll get your money back on that whatever happens unless I am missing something .
goddamitmaverick
27/8/2022
14:26
Folks on this chat still don’t seem to get it. Forget plans and clean ups and whatever, it’s simple. The Bank does not have sufficient capital. It’s costs are too high Relative to income so it’s losing money every day until that changes. It needs more capital through shareholders or via a takeover or merger.Until then it’s worth wind up value , diminishing book value less costs of wind down so maybe 5-10p depending how quickly and efficiently you close it down . With capital and as a going concern and a decent strategy to profitability it could be worth 20-25p
goddamitmaverick
24/8/2022
15:07
# 4188

I'll tell a story, it's a true story.

Once upon a time I had a good year on the stock market, a very good year. A good enough year that I had enough money to try something really speculative. The sort of speculative trade I hoped would change my life. I put around 10% of my portfolio on it, using part of my profits from the year knowing that a full out 10% wipe out would still leave me in a good position overall.

A company called Spehere Medical. It was the first purchase Woodford made in his Patient Capital Trust. I researched it, I met the directors and I learnt everything there was to know.

Then I fell in love with it...

I paid 16p. Then it was 10p and a while later 6p and by know you will have heard similar stories before. Only by now the rest of my portfolio was suffering. Still up from the starting position before my great year but now looking significantly off the top.

And now Sphere is 4p. And of course the lack of delivery at Sphere is unfolding and I can see I will be lucky to get back 7p.

Finally I get a grip on reality. My love affair is over. Sold at around 1.5p for a 85% loss.

Someone always has a reason to buy and sell. They might not be sane or rationale or have a good explanation for their trade but there's always someone selling at the bottom or buying at the top and everywhere inbetween.

cc2014
24/8/2022
14:11
It appears that 80,000 were bought yesterday at 3.00 and 100,000 earlier today at 2.99. Sales in smaller amounts of around 25,000 at around 2.75.

Surprised that anyone wanting to sell has left it until now.

dandigirl
24/8/2022
09:37
I've been watching PCF ever since I sold out some time ago. I keep looking at it but I'm left with two problems:

1. There is insufficient information to make an informed decision
2. Even if I worked out PCF was a screaming buy and I wanted to fill my boots the liquidity has disappeared. Realistically I would want to buy 150k shares as a minimum position and then build from there. The issue is though that even at 150k shares but definintely 300k shares I cannot be comfortable that there will be any liquidity to sell if it turns out I'm wrong. And then there's the spread.

So, I watch and sit on the sidelines, waiting for a trigger to make me buy.

I suspect in normal economic times the directors at PCF would continue to get to grips with the issues, re-establish long term credibility with the PRA and eventually get to a profitable business.

However, we aren't in normal economic times. Impairments are going to start rising over the winter, the cost of funding is increasing and I can't see how the full amount of the additional cost of funding can be passed on to the consumer whilst maintaining the same credit risks.


So, is 3p too high or too low? I have no idea.

cc2014
24/8/2022
08:58
Reverse take over?

It does seem that we will be diluted almost out of existence.

Only numbers we have are the current sp, the injection at 5p and Richardson’s 16.5p NAVPS. My guess is a number between 5p and 16.5p.

The bright side. We could see the end of Moore, Stran and Richardson who have hardly covered themselves in glory since they arrived. They all seem more concerned with process and covering their backsides since they arrived rather than reigniting the business.

And just what is happening to Scott?

dandigirl
24/8/2022
08:15
One of the strange things about the London Stock Exchange: they stop trading when there is material uncertainty over the numbers: none of us had a clue what was going on, whether PCF was bust, or had just tripped. It could have been worth zero, or 10p ( roughly where it reopened first time).

Now, when we could be diluted out of existence, or there might be a bid/merger that gives real hope for the future and some material value ( even if part of a larger group), now trading continues though shareholders are completely blind as to the outcome.

It may be zero, it may be shares in a new unlisted vehicle, it may be shares in a listed bank with a bright future.

Or the talks fail, PCF has to be rescued by a massive, dilutive fundraise. And we are wiped out.

A false market as none of us have a clue

graham1ty
Chat Pages: 225  224  223  222  221  220  219  218  217  216  215  214  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock