Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[nobbygnome] 08/1/2024 11:22

This mock outrage is absolutely pathetic….

[rabito79] 08/1/2024 11:21

Are we to assume you took the explicit photos which have been shared recently. I am sure the photographer is positively seething that his work has not been recognised. Yawn.

[boochy gongles] 08/1/2024 10:57

OWL

1. Why didn't you simply post a link the article?

2. Why didn't you copy & paste the WHOLE article?

3. Why did you omit sections of the article?

It should be noted these are rhetorical questions (we already know the answer) but we welcome your comments.

[vorpal bunny] 08/1/2024 10:32

The crude editing was what made it so blatantly obvious.

OWL is guilty of plagiarism and Rabbit is making himself look stupid trying to defend him.

I guarantee if Kitty, Yombo, Boochy etc had been caught doing similar, the vilification would have been endless.

[vorpal bunny] 08/1/2024 10:27

Rabbit

As Gongles clearly stated yesterday; indeed OWL didn't actually claim authorship but he didn't acknowledge the original source either.

If he hadn't been attempting to pass off the article as his own surely he would have simply posted a link to the original.

You can't defend it Rabbit, it was act of deceit on his part and he was exposed.

[rabito79] 08/1/2024 10:08

I didn't see Olderwiser claiming it as his own. It was pretty clear by the structure and language it had been lifted from another site. Are we now to provide references to any material shared, I didn't see any references on the pictures shared by many on here. To be honest I listen to Olderwiser for his views as an oil industry professional, opposed to those on trolls.

[vorpal bunny] 08/1/2024 10:01

Do you not think it's somewhat underhand, cowardly even dropping into someone else's thread, littering it with your moaning and attention seeking blue text, while denying him access to your precious GUILD ?

[vorpal bunny] 08/1/2024 09:55

What's worse Mickey, posting an image of a naked woman (lady bits hidden by Lidd) or plagiarising someone's work ?

[forwood] 08/1/2024 09:55

yes - you got that right!

[vorpal bunny] 08/1/2024 09:47

'Everthing means ...'

[fordtin] 08/1/2024 09:47

Thanks forwood.

So, if someone wanted to make a bearish post, they would copy&paste the hourly;











However, if they wanted to present a bullish case, they would choose the daily;

[mike290] 08/1/2024 09:46

ps.
It is interesting that Helpfull, as creator of this thread, has chosen not to moderate and therefore remove Boochy Gongles' pornographic posts.

[vorpal bunny] 08/1/2024 09:45

Well if you didn't have Gongles and Kitty on filter you would have learned that OldWizz/OWL has been exposed as a fraud.

He post a lengthy essay about 'trolls' their methods, motivation and how to deal with them, the syntax in this turgid screed wasn't particularly OWL like and Gongles after a few minutes research quickly discovered that your esteemed OWL had copied the whole thing from another website.

And this is the man whose posts you read 'for the facts they contain' ?

The man's a charlatan.

NB: InfluEnce.

[mike290] 08/1/2024 09:36

The only thing that I read on this thread now are posts by Olderwiser (for the facts that they contain) and Coeun (for a laugh).

I skip past everything from Helpfull.
I have not put Helpfull on filter because not doing so allows me to still post warnings on this thread.

Boochy Gongles and Herekittykitty are on filter.

This thread is now completely worthless (except for Olderwiser's and Coeun's posts) and many within the Guild never visit it.
Therefore, Helpfull's influence (if he or she ever had any), by posting here, must be either zero or nearing zero.

I'm happy with that.

[boochy gongles] 08/1/2024 09:34

Now that's a log, all Lizard's done with his is a bit of sanding and varnishing, this is art ..

[boochy gongles] 08/1/2024 09:20

Kitty did you enjoy Lizard outside Bill's Bacon, Brighton?

I have that Lizard/Noddy Chimera available in a variety of sizes and will happily overlay it on any background you choose, just let me know.

[boochy gongles] 08/1/2024 09:17

Some of my posts have THREE RED THUMBS, that means three delicate souls from the BLUE ELITE have read the post and been so irked they have taken the time to bestow the 'dread' condemnation.

Thank you ..

[boochy gongles] 08/1/2024 09:11

Morning 🙂

[helpfull] 08/1/2024 09:08

Cor blimey,guv!

Somebody is shifting sand.

At Alkaid 2 it was 8,000,000 pounds of sand.

That is 3,571 tons.

If that tonnage is repeated in 2,000 wells it would be 7,142,000 tons.

Or 16,000,000,000 pounds of sand.

For various reasons there was a 40% overspend on sand at Alkaid 2.

Estimate of $4,200,000 against an actual of $5,880,000.

$4.2 million x 2,000 would be $8.4 billion spent on sand.

Pantheon hopes to save on that. It needs the estimates to be correct.

Be careful.

[forwood] 08/1/2024 09:04

(edit) Post 37473 is summary of an hourly indicator from Investing.com. That same website has the daily chart as a strong buy!



FWIW I don't rate such automatic evaluations, mainly because they change from moment to moment. Several sites offer similar services as shown by a googling 'Pantheon technical indicators'.

My interpretation of the hourly chart is that it is oversold on all the key indicators and due a rebound. Apologies, but the site's images don't appear to be working!

[mlf51] 08/1/2024 08:24

You are confusing these low life posters with people who seek credibility, they don't.

[fordtin] 08/1/2024 08:15

Re post #37473. At least provide a link to the source if you want any sort of credibility, that screen shot could be about any company!.



for example, the following is a screenshot from the ADVFN page linked below it;