Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[helpfull] 23/11/2023 14:19

Cor blimey, guv!

Cardiff, I believe you.

Don't worry about Mike290 he has been abducted by bed bugs.

Mike290 luvvy, what do you not believe?

Be careful.

[mike290] 23/11/2023 14:15

Cardiff, I don't believe you either.

[content5827] 23/11/2023 14:13

Cardiffcity.anyone can say they have a contact with anyone and make any type of claim they wish to.
It’s meaningless without validation.

[trigger blade] 23/11/2023 14:08

Yes, me neither.

[content5827] 23/11/2023 14:02

Cardiffcity.
I am long but I am always prepared to listen to the shorts.panr wouldn’t be the first stock that I have bought that flopped.
If you are going to make statements that you know what is going on in the city,you need to validate and you also you need to reveal who you are.
Otherwise how can people who are willing to listen,take you seriously.

[mike290] 23/11/2023 13:57

cardiff,

You registered with Advfn a week ago and already you're hearing stuff about Pantheon.

Really?

[helpfull] 23/11/2023 13:52

Cor blimey, guv!

Mike290 is having a breakdown on a share bulletin board.

Coeun, who used to post as Mad dRIP, sadly had a similar breakdown and now sits in a corner typing "liar". His carer encourages him because it is a lot safer than standing on a street corner with his breeks around his ankles, shouting at buses.

Does anyone know if it is illegal to get paid for a post?

I notice Mike290 pays his fwends with +1 coins for posts.

Is it illegal to be a hypocrite?

Be careful.

[mike290] 23/11/2023 13:37

As far as I can see, one of very few reasons for Pro_S2009 and Helpfull to continue posting such deceitful content on these two Pantheon bulletin boards is that they are paid for each post.
This would explain why they persist in posting with such frequency and low quality.

When their client determines that they exert no or negligible influence, perhaps it will stop paying an amount per post.

[mike290] 23/11/2023 13:33

As far as I can see, one of very few reasons for Pro_S2009 and Helpfull to continue posting such deceitful content on these two Pantheon bulletin boards is that they are paid for each post.
This would explain why they persist in posting with such frequency and low quality.

When their client determines that they exert no or negligible influence, perhaps it will stop paying an amount per post.

[pro_s2009] 23/11/2023 12:56

Helpfull 23 Nov '23 - 12:44 - 10780 of 10783

Cor blimey, guv!

The webinar was a good indicator of the problems ahead for Pantheon and why the 2028 timeline is too optimistic.

The sand supply is not sorted, and getting the desired sand might be a problem.

The design of the hot tap is determined by the oil pipeline manager and not Pantheon. Although Pantheon has a right to the link, one can imagine delays.

The problem Pantheon will have with suppliers is credibility.

They will always be at the back of the queue, behind the monied big boys and the established players.

A good example of that was shown in the delay of the NSAI report by six months to mid 2024.

Put up the cash or stand aside for the big boys, and they did just that.

Expect plans and timelines to be battered as 2028 approaches.

Be careful.

[pro_s2009] 23/11/2023 12:54

Helpfull. 23 Nov '23 - 12:21 - 10774 of 10783

Cor blimey, guv!

How big is the cash raise going to be?

Capital Cost to First Production = $120 million

The $120 million outlined above is just the cost of the three wells expected to be drilled by the time production starts up.

FID due end of 2025 for first production in 2026.

But the company is going to drill 10 wells in the first year (of which eight would be production wells) and a further 16 wells in the second year (of which 12 would be production wells).

So that's 10 wells in 2026.

At $20 million each.

That's $200 million in total.

Or $260 million including add ons.

And no RBL.

There is a looming cash raise(s).

And it could be $260 million.

That's at today's prices.

Or a dilution of 1,000,000,000 shares.

Every share you buy today might have a little fwend when you wake up tomorrow.

Be careful.

[mike290] 23/11/2023 12:52

Re: "I was actually disappointed to see first scot126 and then swendab1 go."

Yeah, sure. Whatever you say.

[mike290] 23/11/2023 12:51

Just a reminder, as far as I'm aware, Scot126 still posts on X (formerly known as Twitter).

[pro_s2009] 23/11/2023 12:50

hondacbf I was actually disappointed to see first scot126 and then swendab1 go.

However Mike290 and sirmark (aka skidmark) have come to the rescue to keep me interested.

Mike290 has since become boring, so he is filtered, but skidmark is still there to amuse me.