Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[mike290] 21/11/2023 13:21

Pro_S2009,

Spending a few pounds on PlusOneCoins (via Coinbase.com and southxchange.com) in order to disrupt your endlessly deceitful activities has been a genuine pleasure.
:-)

[mike290] 21/11/2023 13:18

Pro_S2009,

Spending a few pounds on PlusOneCoins (via Coinbase.com and southxchange.com) in order to disrupt your endlessly deceitful activities has been a genuine pleasure.
:-)

[mike290] 21/11/2023 13:16

Pro_S2009 and Helpfull are simply laughing stock.

[coeun] 21/11/2023 13:16

He filter everyone who calls him out for what he is. A liar

[mike290] 21/11/2023 13:15

Pro_S2009 and Helpfull are simply laughing stock.

[mike290] 21/11/2023 13:11

mlf51,

Re: "Crayons, be careful."

You really made me laugh.

[cbaron1] 21/11/2023 13:07

10585
That's plainly ridiculous as your logic would suggest that any and all expert reports in any field, be that oil exploration, legal, accounting, etc could or should be brought into question simply because it is paid for by the company procuring it.
Sorry, but that's the commercial world we live in.
You appear to be going around in ever decreasing circles and will soon disappear you know where. It may be dark, be sure to take a torch!🔦

[mike290] 21/11/2023 13:06

Post removed. Duplicated in error.

[mlf51] 21/11/2023 12:58

Crayons, be careful.

[helpfull] 21/11/2023 12:56

Cor blimey, guv!

mlf5121, I've always found you boring, but I willn't be filtering you.

Be careful.

[mike290] 21/11/2023 12:54

Why does it matter if you filter me?

:-)

[pro_s2009] 21/11/2023 12:52

Your boring as well now mlf51, sticking you in the Filtered poster bin along with Mike290.

No fun.

Skidmark is at least some fun to wind up.

[pro_s2009] 21/11/2023 12:48

Told you Mike, your boring and filtered now.

I am sure pretty much anyone who is not a PANR shareholder has now filtered you.

But hey, keep on paying ADVFN - and knowing your only spending that money because of me.

:) :)


Mike290 21 Nov '23 - 12:43 - 36764 of 36764 (Filtered)

[coeun] 21/11/2023 12:47

NSAI reports are only right when they suit pro and his cohorts of stupidity

[pro_s2009] 21/11/2023 12:46

Told you already..........MSAI report is based on data supplied to NSAI by PANR who are paying for the report.

Hobbsy was not around when a lot of data was acquired.

Now.......NSAI report is only as good as the data supplied (supplied to NSAI by PANR who are paying NSAI to work with the PANR supplie data). If any of the data was later proven incorrect, erroneous, invalid etc.......... then everything in the NSAI report can be wrong, and thats fine too........as their disclaimer is in place.

[mike290] 21/11/2023 12:46

Pro_S2009,

I am only interested in keeping others aware of your extremely deceitful activities on Advfn's bulletin boards.

My posts might be boring. However, I have no interest in entertaining you.

I will continue to frequently warn others about you (on Pantheon's, HE1's, PRD's and TXP's threads) though - whether you filter me or not :-)

[mike290] 21/11/2023 12:43

Pro_S2009,

I am only interested in keeping others aware of your extremely deceitful activities on Advfn's bulletin boards.

My posts might be boring. However, I have no interest in entertaining you.

I will continue to frequently warn others about you (on Pantheon's, HE1's, PRD's and TXP's threads) though - whether you filter me or not :-)

[cbaron1] 21/11/2023 12:38

10581
But at 10573 you said, "But NSAI said all is good" and came up with no legitimate reason why that's not the case.

[coeun] 21/11/2023 12:35

Trying to ramp he1, you're on the wrong bb.

[pro_s2009] 21/11/2023 12:23

At this stage, HE1 have as much commercial Helium as PANR have commercial reserves.

Both have ZERO


However, HE1 will commence drilling of Itumbula-1 in a couple of weeks. This has an excellent chance of proving commercial Helium.

PANR wont commence drilling anything that could prove commerciality until 2025 on the current planning, and even then, its possible it will be yet another PANR failure.

[cbaron1] 21/11/2023 12:21

10573
Pro that's actually starting to look like reasoned analysis, but then you go and let yourself down again at 10578.
Question 1 & 2 are the same point answered by 3 "NSAI said all is good". To be relying on the 'get out' that appears in the T's & C's of all expert reports is clutching at straws, particularly given that the data upon which they may have relied was produced by SLB and other acknowledged experts.

Question 4 PANR won't spend the money on further wells until they have clarity on flow. If they do go to raise further funds they will be assured (as much as they can be) of success and value creation. The share price will not be challenged as you propose, if, as I propose, the cash is well spent and creates commensurate value.

As to Question 5 if the further reports from NSAI continue do what they say on the tin, there is little doubt in my mind that the majors will come calling, if they haven't already. PANR says it has already issued NDA's. Why would this area not be commercial when it is right next to TAPS? Equally as close if not closer to a market delivery route than other oil fields further north.

All IMO, of course.

[nobbygnome] 21/11/2023 12:17

That’s precisely what is happening at HE1…

[pro_s2009] 21/11/2023 12:12

Helpie.......

Ever heard of the phrase "putting lipstick on a pig"

Did I spell that correctly ?