![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.50 | 2.54% | 20.20 | 20.25 | 20.65 | 20.85 | 19.70 | 20.00 | 1,570,624 | 16:35:15 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 804k | -1.45M | -0.0015 | -135.00 | 186.01M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/3/2023 06:05 | Lol no. You bought in, and your narrative changed, price had fallen since. I'm glad you're against lol. Please keep going, and I promise we will see ATH soon enough. | maxxy1 | |
16/3/2023 05:50 | Perhaps you should read the LRL and MOIL threads.........this is what happens when rampers meet operational failure........despi Emjoy. | pro_s2009 | |
16/3/2023 05:46 | But maxxy1.......I have been negative on PANR for months.......the share price has crashed. I have been very right. All you rampers should have an inverse investment chart........you seem to buy and keep topping up as the share price collapses........ PANR is really a lesson in why you should ignore all the rampers, dont get sucked into echo chamber Guilds......dont chase falling knives........dont get emotionally involved in stocks........dont listen to "BB experts"........... just trade the stock like any other, make profit when it rises and dont make losses when it falls. LOL. | pro_s2009 | |
16/3/2023 05:42 | I'm glad #PROtard is back and whining. He is kinda Cramer, always wrong lol. Someone should start inverse PROtard index lol | maxxy1 | |
16/3/2023 04:33 | You may wonder, but those who know a lot more than you and I about drilling through rocks and sand to get to oil, and to develop wells and reservoirs are in it and predicting great things here. They know there are difficulties, particularly at the beginning when accessing the oil in place, because each reservoir and drill is different, and despite all the technology, rarely opens up problem free to the first probe. But they learn and persist and eventually get it right. I think I prefer to go along with them rather than the sceptics like you who are deterred by the first problem, and change their views on the prospects as easily as the wind changes direction. We are less than 20 miles south of the largest developed set of reservoirs in North America, where these self same problems of gas and sand and flows have been overcome to pump billions. When they have been overcome here, we will not want to hear from you and what you thought and did, all you sceptics. Probably you will be gone elsewhere to sow your doubts and poor understanding and in many cases lies and slurs to undermine the efforts of others. Or maybe you will have learned to have faith in those efforts and persist, despite the difficulties at the beginning, for the eventual prize. Maybe! | forwood | |
16/3/2023 03:31 | Jak Yes there is a mass of data that says it should be, models etc Then the Alkaid 1 data and flow test Then the drill data showing it was all in oil through the horizontal Then there is the flow test underway backing the early data up Without the gas cap contact where would the flow be ? Then there are the people that both have the data, and skills to know what it means interpreting it as commercial. Note Jay does not say might, he says will Ultimately commercial is simple, it means the play is going to be commercial You are just choosing a negative interpretation for your own reasons Back to the question you are ducking, where is your evidence that it is not commercial, skip the opinions if you don't mind, evidence please | ![]() olderwiser2 | |
16/3/2023 00:50 | To the assembly of shorters Have you any evidence that the Alkaid 2 flow is not commercial. We all know the numbers IP 30 is at 180 oil, 325 condensate and NGLs, plus 2300mcf/d of gas We also have an entirely plausible explanation for the under expectation H/C liquids flow, in the gas cap contact displacing and inhibiting oil flow. | ![]() olderwiser2 | |
15/3/2023 23:32 | neil.......brave man. It seems that potentially pretty much everything in the PANR area has issues with poor flow, low flow, blocking up - one wonders if this is just like other areas of the world.......lots of Oil In Place but none of it is commercially viable...... Which is why 2 AIM companies in 88E and PANR are spending a fortune of shareholders money on salaries/bonus and share options looking and are the only ones doing any drilling there. Even PMO who farmed into an 88E well, run away as soon as seeing gas and condensate and the well logging results by 88E at Charlie-1. Its possible the whole area is just like "fools gold"............lot ANS oil price is now below 80$........ even with the most "wonderful accounting to project cheap well costs in future"....... is any of this 88E/PANR area actually possible to be viable commercially ? | pro_s2009 | |
15/3/2023 23:23 | Another wrong call by the pauper lying toe rag that is Prozac2019. 🤣🤣 | ![]() specialistwasagypsey | |
15/3/2023 23:06 | I've noticed on quite a few stocks that have fallen significsntly this year....amd 150p to 24p is reaaonably significant i think we can all agree...that folk are aelling to lock in the losses to offset againat gains in this tax year. I have my eye on a few atocks that will almost certainly rebound heavily in the new tax year. Of course PANR is not one of them, but it does mean continued significant downward pressure for the next couple of weeks. Why would anybody want to buy now anyway, when all the pressure is downwards? Only halfwits would buy now. | ![]() ohdearohdearohdear | |
15/3/2023 22:56 | hxxps://youtube/_aud Alkaid drive by 13/03/23 | dannybeck | |
15/3/2023 22:49 | Alkaid Drive by 13/03/23 hxxps://youtu.be/_au | dannybeck | |
15/3/2023 22:36 | Pro, re: "Is that the same SMD which blocked up and stopped flowing at Talitha" and "One wonders if that blockage was sand". Again a non-problem. The Alkaid 2 horizontal test flowed at the same rate despite the large sand blockage. the fracks were so successful that the oil flowed along the frack lines longitudinally, bypassing the blockage. And the SMD has even better reservoir characteristics. | neil9327b | |
15/3/2023 22:14 | They're a pair of fluffers fluffing all day every day. | ![]() madd_rip | |
15/3/2023 22:07 | Funny how truant and bull post simultaneously. Are you a couple living in the same house? | ![]() padamster | |
15/3/2023 22:02 | Maybe pro needs to blow harder, he can practice on His shorter mates, it'll be like a orgy of nob nibblers. | ![]() madd_rip | |
15/3/2023 21:56 | I heard there wasn’t enough pressure to keep the fracs open | ![]() rabito79 | |
15/3/2023 21:54 | Not much to say about PANR now, end of the roadFIN | ![]() truant2tb1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions