ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

NWG Natwest Group Plc

307.20
-1.10 (-0.36%)
14 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Natwest Group Plc LSE:NWG London Ordinary Share GB00BM8PJY71 ORD 107.69P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.10 -0.36% 307.20 307.20 307.40 310.00 300.50 308.50 15,037,410 16:29:55
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 14.77B 4.64B 0.5271 5.83 27.02B
Natwest Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NWG. The last closing price for Natwest was 308.30p. Over the last year, Natwest shares have traded in a share price range of 168.30p to 328.20p.

Natwest currently has 8,795,471,955 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Natwest is £27.02 billion. Natwest has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.83.

Natwest Share Discussion Threads

Showing 3976 to 3998 of 4850 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  170  169  168  167  166  165  164  163  162  161  160  159  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/10/2023
10:26
..I disagree about where you think the share price headed, you said ~150p

...the numbers will always get you in the end

too cheap imo
..while the weak FTSE & weak USA mkts does not help the NWG share price

;-)

smithie6
27/10/2023
10:23
I think the figures don’t or won’t justify it but sentiment is everything and I can see a steady drip down to 155 levels over next few weeks. Good luck if you buy now but I’d keep some back.

Rose was a disgrace. Presiding over a toxic Left wing bullying culture that is prevalent these days. She should be stripped of her bonus. Greed and misconduct at a high level.

xongkudu
27/10/2023
10:08
I agree with you almost completely.

For normal more junior staff member, imo it would not be a sacking offence, just a ticking off. To sack a junior staff member would be too harsh imo
But for a director the standards to be met are much higher.
eg. should not bring the company in to disrepute I think, when disclosing opinions not authorized by the board. And comply with all banking regs including client privacy rules.

Most private info was kept private I think such as his account number, card number, transactions, balance etc etc.

smithie6
27/10/2023
10:05
smithie6

Then if what she did was illegal why are they giving her a £2.4 million, (possibly much more) pay off?

If it was a regular employee then surely that would have been gross misconduct and they would have got nothing?

tim 3
27/10/2023
09:54
Yes it might be one of those falls that allow investors to catch the slow rise back up - an odd percent at a time.... And of course get any dividends...

One thing is for sure its not going under as its backed by HM Gov so that is one thing less to worry about compared to most companies.

netcurtains
27/10/2023
09:45
tim3

"So is a bank employee discussing a customers financial affairs with a journalist legal?

If so handy to know that bank staff can legally discuss our private financial affairs in public with whoever they want!"

No, of course not, not legal. The report states that that was not correct & is a subject for the regulator. Any bank staff that broke regulations might be fined by the regulator, & the bank might possibly get a fine. But since the employee broke the bank's own rules it might be difficult/impossible to fine the bank (as long as the bank can show that it trains it's staff about the bank's rules including privacy rules).

('if' there were some penalty for the bank it would imo be negligible wrt the bank's profits.
This legal report will have cost more than any possible fine imo..A lot of noise about nothing, regards the shares, imo)

smithie6
27/10/2023
09:41
Good luck Crazi, i've been adding myself.
smurfy2001
27/10/2023
09:35
Just another blighty scam, U.K. is broken
ny boy
27/10/2023
09:32
So is a bank employee discussing a customers financial affairs with a journalist legal?

If so handy to know that bank staff can legally discuss our private financial affairs in public with whoever they want!

tim 3
27/10/2023
09:22
Btw
Share buybacks
....are those from the Govt holding & hence reducing the % held by the Govt bit by bit ??

With the high profits some serious share buybacks could happen.

smithie6
27/10/2023
09:15
Market Caps are often driven by sentiment short term (Warren Buffet's 'voting machine') and I think NWG is one that is suffering from an overdose of negative sentiment that is driving this price down.

I bought a small tranche a couple of weeks ago after it got hit by Barclays' (I think) Results.

I've waded in today with a normal size (for me) purchase at £1.76

Faragegate will blow over, it's still very profitable. It has a t/o of £14B, Profit £4B. MCap of just £20B - Really?

Government stake much reduced (38, down from 84%), this could easily be a takeover target with the Predator paying at least the £2.68 that was achieved by the last tranche sale in May. I'm sure the Government would welcome the cash injection.

pulsey
27/10/2023
09:09
185p now

-----

That buy note this morning from Smithie6 Capital Markets was perhaps spot on.

smithie6
27/10/2023
09:08
Maxk - agreed

Another British stitch up to save face.

Imo Rose should not be paid a penny on departure and any bonuses/LTIP's etc clawed back

misterd1
27/10/2023
09:06
Bounce back is underway.

Profit in first 9 months £3.4 bln versus £2.4 bln in '22. Looks good to me.
p/e is very low

smithie6
27/10/2023
09:04
..'dishonest'

I don't think so.

His balance was way below the minimum at Coutts, so imo it wasn't at all dishonest to close his account. It broke rules to reveal some private info. Revealing the reason for closing his account, well, they probably are not allowed to reveal that to the public.

smithie6
27/10/2023
09:03
Laughable..



Yet the Travers Smith report states: “For the avoidance of doubt, Travers Smith do not consider there to be any evidence that the client’s pro-Brexit stance, or his party-political affiliations, were factors in the exit decision.”

maxk
27/10/2023
09:03
I would have thought that dumping Farage and being attacked by the hapless Ian Duncan Smith would be good for business.

Hard to read the markets these days.

careful
27/10/2023
08:57
"Legal" .....possibly."Dishonest" - certainly! Not a good look for a bank!
markingtime
27/10/2023
08:57
...they mentioned that some wrong doing did happen but that that it is a subject for the regulator.

It was a mess up....Coutts were entitled to close Mr Farage's account since his balance did not meet their rules.
But they broke rules by revealing info to the public domain. They probably should just have said no comment.
If Farage revealed his private info that is up to him but a bank can't reveal anything.

Impact on NWG ?

Zero imo !!

-------

Did this legal review perhaps cost say £1-5 million ??
Would have been better to pay say £100k to Farage as compensation with the agreement that withdraw complaint & subject closed.
NWG would have saved a few million phps.

smithie6
27/10/2023
08:56
Opens at 16.8p old money. UK stock market is broken.
smurfy2001
27/10/2023
08:54
Another blighty scam
ny boy
27/10/2023
08:50
The law firm said that debanking him was legal

Did they comment on the wrong doings of rose and all the other people involved?

Scandalous imo

misterd1
27/10/2023
08:40
Woke Britain is a disgrace. Glad Farage said No. A word most people are too cowardly to say these days.
craftyale
Chat Pages: Latest  170  169  168  167  166  165  164  163  162  161  160  159  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock