Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[syd777] 30/9/2016 15:11

Nice to see your still here PC.

[perfect choice] 30/9/2016 15:06

syd/jfacwc - PC is still here but just monitoring on the side-lines now. Trailing stop loss was effectively invoked as well as consideration placing will occur at some stage in the future. Still very positive on Nano future, this is just a matter of timing for me. Going to wait for the 11th October results to see what is said now before deciding my next move.

Critical short term objective for now is Dow's approval by Samsung and then how much of a part they play in supply. Samsung have announced they want to move to QD based production for all their TV range not just SUHD, so just a case of whether Dow supply as part of the SUHD progressive expansion or when Samsung expand further into the rest of their range. Samsung QDs are Cadmium free and have always been. They were developed by Hansol not Nanosys which people forget, Hansol are using part of the Nanosys production process under license, not the fill end to end IP. Nanosys themselves have declared openly all their R&D is based on cadmium free only so it is purely a matter of time now.

That's enough for now, back to work!

[slipperysidewinder] 30/9/2016 15:05

Firminator

It depends on whether you believe you can fool all of the people all if the time. Or not.

It's that simple.

[firminator1] 30/9/2016 14:58

Slippy you strike me as someone with a really balanced and objective view on nanoco. Would you advise i hold out until the 11th October for news and longer term or sell my shares this afternoon ?

[syd777] 30/9/2016 14:35

Low volume again sea of blue with small to medium trades from 11.58pm let's hope the trend continues until close,with another sly short closing later.

[slipperysidewinder] 30/9/2016 14:25

So we sit here until the 11th. My guess is smoke and mirrors followed by rights issue followed by share price collapse.

There will be nothing to report apart from the spending of huge amounts of shareholders cash.

[jfacwc] 30/9/2016 14:20

syd.. thought PC only admitted in dabbling in a bit of trading? No backing out... who wants to post on here anyway? while ssw about.Brucie... admire your patience. I just filter him.Whatever happens to nano... I sincerely hope ssw has not had any influence ... still think he's some kind of plant, although it's a wierd way of going about business.

[syd777] 30/9/2016 14:03

Ignor the kid and he'll give up.

[slipperysidewinder] 30/9/2016 14:02

Indeed I thing a lot of the long term longs who have sloped off after various excuses have probably salvaged what they can here and decided to set their sights on new horizons.

Good luck to them.

[slipperysidewinder] 30/9/2016 14:00

Brucie reducing his position and deciding to hold his tongue until at least 11th Oct is a salutary lesson for inexperienced longs who should be taking note.

[syd777] 30/9/2016 13:46

Bruice PC backed out too,Well the 11th could be a buying opportunity or a very bad missed opportunity,I'm betting on the £1.00 scenario.

[brucie5] 30/9/2016 13:38

Well, I have posted enough here for time being. Will refrain from further posting until the results, unless we have a RNS before then. I have reduced my position somewhat over recent days, in reflection of the uncertainty and greater short term confidence in certain other positions, but still hold a substantial proportion of my folio here. I find it a shame that Mapocho is not still here.

[slipperysidewinder] 30/9/2016 13:14

Onething

Get real. The same argument was used for like of info on the original Dow deal. I said all along it would fall apart and milestone and royalties would be Minsk and terms restrictive. I was right on all counts. And I will be here also.

[onething] 30/9/2016 12:56

It's addressed to SSW but the question is open to everyone really. Ie is it no surprise to receive zero feedback on sales and royalties, or it it a cause for concern?

[knobbly] 30/9/2016 12:52

Can't believe you are wasting your time responding to SSW, who it appears to have a clear agenda.

Ignore him and he will stop his bleating and move on.

[onething] 30/9/2016 12:49

Slippery, given your stated experience of technology and licensing, are you surprised that Nanoco is not releasing sales and royalty figures to the market? My assumption is that this would be compromising their clients' commercial confidentiality.Or should Nano be free to disclose as much information as they like, disregarding their clients' wishes? In which case we should wonder why we have not yet had the good news we are waiting for.

[roadster750] 30/9/2016 12:08

remember cannocrd media presentation
Fourteen minutes into presentation ME states Dow at point of final approval to supply the "big S"

[enteleon] 30/9/2016 11:41

Brucie5- Excellent, well balanced, well argued posting. We need more folk like you !

[brucie5] 30/9/2016 11:34

Slipperysidewinder30 Sep '16 - 11:30 - 5573 of 5576 0 0
Brucie

There is still no evidence the market will turn to cad free. I mean I've seen posts saying TV's will be cad free by 2015. Well that hadn't happened. Then 2016. That hasn't happened.

Now look at the big players. LG are not convinced and neither are Samsung?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slippery-

Samsung advertise their sets as CF. Take a look.

From April 2016

hxxps://news.samsung.com/global/why-are-quantum-dot-displays-so-good

What’s So Great About Samsung’s Quantum Dots?
Many previously developed quantum dot solutions were based on materials that involve cadmium, such as cadmium sulfide (CdS) or selenide (CdSe). Although these quantum dots share the same advantages as written above, they hold a deadly threat against the environment as toxic Cd2+ ions may be released through nanoparticle degradation.

Samsung’s quantum dots, however, are cadmium-free. They’re based on indium (In) instead. After much research and development, Samsung is currently the only company that produces cadmium-free quantum dot displays. Samsung started focusing on quantum dot technology in 2001, and has since registered over 150 patents on the subject.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, I understand that Nanosys' CF dots are not yet ready for sales; which leaves Hansol. And..?