ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

MTFB Motif Bio Plc

0.50
0.00 (0.00%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Motif Bio Plc LSE:MTFB London Ordinary Share GB00BVVT4H71 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.50 0.40 0.55 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Motif Bio Share Discussion Threads

Showing 9001 to 9025 of 9925 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  361  360  359  358  357  356  355  354  353  352  351  350  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/2/2021
08:14
In your opinion. You don't speak for all of us!! There are many, I'm sure, who want at least some of their money back. As I said, you don't speak for all of us.
rfcmoore66
09/2/2021
08:10
Chatting to many investors we are pretty sure that the deal won’t be structured in a way that gives any meaningful value back to the long term investors. No sense that this BoD has put our interests over theirs when you look at the salaries they have paid themselves despite failing.

Genuinely believe they don’t realise how many shares individual investors held by the end of July 2020 to vote down any RTO that just shoves more wads of cash into their pockets.

I will wait for the finer details which of course will come once Gold has secured his last deferred salary payment in March but currently the mood is to vote against it

scottdavid70
08/2/2021
21:52
Nothing to do with Motif just an interesting link on FCA becoming more active

hxxps://apple.news/AAQ_EkO1aRAirdRwYvPys8g

scottdavid70
08/2/2021
16:53
What incentive would the RTO candidate have for giving up the rights to the Iclaprim profits? It would have to be in the interests of the 'new' Motif for them to agree to it.
bi11y ray va1entine
08/2/2021
15:16
If you think the contract will stay valid post RTO for long term suffering shareholders I think personally you will be disappointed
scottdavid70
08/2/2021
12:01
What are you going on about? They've already told us what the deal is with Iclaprim. Hercules owns it now, and Motif gets any monetization above the debt they owed them. They've literally spelled it out for you in black and white.
bi11y ray va1entine
07/2/2021
22:54
Never ever forget about Iclaprim of you care about getting a return on your money.

Bombard the company with questions about the situation. Trust me the health of your wealth depends on it

Gold and Lumsden wealth only depends on a shabby, thread bare RTO going through. Yours needs Iclaprim they don’t which is why it’s all gone black on Iclaprim

scottdavid70
07/2/2021
21:42
That’s exactly the mentality they hoped to achieve and accomplish and from your response they have done so
scottdavid70
07/2/2021
09:18
SD70- is not something back better than nothing? We may have to swallow hard at rewarding Lummy & Co! We can't change the past but maybe we can influence the future? Perhaps?
smcl
07/2/2021
08:50
Insider knowledge there perfectstorm - the way you say it would suggest that as we expect an annihilation of long term investors holdings.

Makes sense when Lumsden and Gold get hard cash for any RTO no matter the outcome for shareholders and a tasty BONUS is the cherry on top

What news of Iclaprim??? Sound of crickets?

scottdavid70
07/2/2021
08:34
The waiting is over, the RNS in the morning will finally put an end to the speculation.
perfectstorm
07/2/2021
02:50
Let’s be honest if Greedy Graham gets a £100,000 BONUS for a RTO which he has very little to do with and hasn’t got Iclaprim sold for the benefit of shareholders who invested here on the back of his proclamations. How is he deserving of BONUs?

How can anyone of sane mind say, that BONUS money which will come out of this last fund raise which has diluted shareholders further into OBLIVION II’s JUSTIFIED?

That and the extra £50,000 Jon Gold(en) touch is pocketing for the extra two months that should have been finalised in Jan could make the RTO even more attractive to “The Target”

Cleaning out the coffers only serves to remind us what we have all been put through for the benefit of a very select selfish few Board Members

scottdavid70
06/2/2021
10:36
Chuffer - working for free??? Recognition if of their failures?
Having empathy with investors?
Doing the conscionable thing?
Doing as a Director should and not bypassing a review of the Board in 2019 as stated in good Corporate Governance?

This is the Greed of Gold and the Lord of Lumsden we are taking about. Not only the wrong century for that type of consciousness from a Director but also and most definitely the wrong company

RTO just needs to be completed for Gold and Lumsden to cash in. Zero appetite to go the extra mile for lowly peasant investors I can assure you.

If they did they would return the money they have earmarked for themselves since Feb 2018 and the Valentines Day massacre

Never forget

scottdavid70
06/2/2021
10:06
I said OTHER reasons, Scott. You've just retyped the same one again. Instead of waiting to see what deal they've come up with, you're just assuming it's a bad one and are using it as an excuse to complain.
bi11y ray va1entine
06/2/2021
08:40
You have to admit Scott has a point.
If the bod had any morals, they could of carried out the extended period (yet again)for zero pay but that will never happen.
Whatever cash that was left in the account has now vanished.
I’d liked to be surprised with an extraordinarily deal for shareholders but that will never happen as time will tell.
Pigs in troughs....

chuffer2
06/2/2021
00:33
I have worked them out - more loot for the man with the Gold(en) touch

See you on the other side of a RTO ever materialises

Where art thou Iclaprim and where doesth one fit into the future or do we just forget you ever existed? People would like that scenario it appears

scottdavid70
05/2/2021
21:22
Scott, if you can't work out any other reasons why the negotiations have continued right up to the deadline you're not thinking hard enough.
bi11y ray va1entine
05/2/2021
20:21
Don’t think this delay is because of Iclaprim or any decent upside for investors.

It’s just for Gold to pay himself ALL the money from the raise.

Remember he has £25,000 deferred payments per month last year waiting to be gobbled up on top of his £25,000 monthly. Snaffle snaffle that cash Me Gold

scottdavid70
05/2/2021
20:17
Just Remember your Chairman and President Mr JON GOLD stands to make ANOTHER £100,000 by taking an EXTRA TWO MONTHS TO DO THE RTO.

Therefore EATING UP ALL OF THE £650,000 RAISED IN MAY LAST YEAR.

That could have been good cash for the new company if he had done his job and got the RTO COMPLETED ON TIME.

This has just been one giant vacuum cleaner operation of hoovering up cash either by having it in your contract as Lumsden when he raised he got paid. Now we have a delay of 2 months that costs us as investors but allows Gold(en) touch to add another £100,000 PURE PROFIT into his account.

No one gets paid extra for being late, most get fired at Motif you get BONUSES

scottdavid70
05/2/2021
08:00
Everyone checking their accounts to see if their is a corporate action notice. Don’t bother until you have seen the details I promise you won’t want to vote it through after the consolidation is revealed.

Remember just getting a RTO done is good enough for yet ANOTHER $100,000 for Lumsden and over 300,000 for Mr Gold(en) touch.

Easy corporate street is the action you want not the lowly life of a peasant investor who invests based on their guidance. Scandalous stuff

scottdavid70
04/2/2021
23:06
I have invested in a company along with many others that pays $100,000 in PR fees and investor relations. Their job is to answer questions we have that relate to our investment as things change. They have changed dramatically and even though we have taken advice it means very little until it comes from the company
scottdavid70
04/2/2021
13:16
It's not about trying to defend anyone. I'm explaining that some of the questions you're asking could be answered by anyone familiar with the most basic elements of intellectual property law. So if you and your associates are so heavily invested here, how can you know so little about patents? It doesn't add up.
bi11y ray va1entine
04/2/2021
11:42
If you are trying to defend this BOD to me it won’t wash.

Iclaprim’s future and new patents are of HUGE interest and we should know more of what those patents mean as there is a contractual agreement. Tired of being kept like a group of mushrooms investors are

Could be a gamechanger as the RTO isn’t of any importance to the BoD as they have cash coming their way just on completion. Easy money for them and I don’t have any hope other than the almost certainty that huge dilution and consolidation are in current investors futures.

scottdavid70
03/2/2021
20:07
Scott, you often say that you're in contact with other investors who, along with you, hold a sizeable stake in this company. Isn't there someone in that group who you trust and who's knowledgeable enough to answer your questions? Most of them are general matters relating to contract law, patent law etc. They're not specifically about Motif's operations. I believe that's why the company doesn't spend time responding to them.
bi11y ray va1entine
03/2/2021
19:37
No they have a duty to keep us informed about what is happy with Iclaprim. That’s all they have to do and they haven’t.

Just another failure to add to the list of failings whilst in charge.

I will contact them again as I keep a log of all the emails they have ignored from me with genuine questions they haven’t answered

scottdavid70
Chat Pages: Latest  361  360  359  358  357  356  355  354  353  352  351  350  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock