Mbl Share Discussion Threads

[brwo349] 14/10/2010 21:38

He's pumped some real turkeys. Obvious to anyone with a brain but not CR.

[goonertone] 14/10/2010 20:52

CR

Miamisteve's comments noted thanks. I listened this morning and heard the bit about the brother but not the resteraunt.

Never listen to the likes of 8trader other than to occasionally go have a look at a share I'm unaware of, usually to depart fairly quickly and to be honest I think a large majority here wouldn't have ridden in on 8traders coat tails either its just not that sort of stock.

Anyway I am off to decide whether to still trudge up the motorway on Monday.

GT

[cockneyrebel] 14/10/2010 20:31

Fair enough Goonertone - you might be one of the ones that does a bit of research but I'm pretty sure there's a lot here that just followed him in here without doing it. The 'PC runs a tight ship' type posts that don't actually look that tight a sceptic might say.

Was the 'related party' declaration in the previous years accounts? If not why not?

The link to the pub story was because miamisteve said this above:

"Cowgill set out at the beginning to dispell rumours and slurs. Something about funneling off money to fund TA brothers restaurant, which I'd never heard about"

It's not TA's brothers restaurant according to that link but it's owned by TA too. That's why I posted the link.

Best of luck - I hope it does bounce for you. I'd just say to others tho that listening to the likes of HateTrader and all his rubbish to suck you in leaves you holding the baby if you do take his word as gospel.

CR

[cockneyrebel] 14/10/2010 20:17

You post it HateTrader.

While you're at it ask them why Sales Media Solutions were issued a 'Striking Off' action to strike them of the register last year. It was dropped in November but someone must have been pretty disgruntled with SMS I'd have thought.

Just one of the sort of questions you'd have been better off digging around to find out instead of chasing me all over ADVFN ramping your various rubbish.

CR

[cockneyrebel] 14/10/2010 18:59

Seems to me MUBL have been using the same method of supply via Sales Media Solutions Ltd under it's previous guise Media Sales Direct Ltd in the previous years.

Anyone know why, as this is the same guy's business basically that they changed the company from one to the other?

I've also looked through the co accounts for the previous year and I can't see a notice of a related party transaction in those accounts - is it in there? If it isn't why not?

CR

[kimboy2] 14/10/2010 18:47

Why not go and have your argument here;

[cockneyrebel] 14/10/2010 18:24

LoL - you suckered loads into these, RGT, MPS and no end of stocks Hatetader and left people fried - had the nerve to post on IDS thread that I should be in these and not IDS.

I post factual and honest. Every time I post opinion it's clearly marked imo.

I pointed out this wasn't an investment for me an why. Others took a different view, that's their choice. But you just post codswallop and ramps - suck people in and your gone - look at them in RGT - a disaster tho it did survive more than a week that your MPS ramp survived.

Good luck - I hope these bounce to £2 for all the holders but shooting the messenger doesn't ever save your bacon when the messenger has thought about the situation a bit more than the shareholders.

CR

[jeffian] 14/10/2010 18:18

"The cc will be on replay."

Where's that then? Can't find anything on the MBL website.

I was out all day so couldn't listen to the cc. Could some kind soul post a resumé, please. The posts above give a snippet of various issues raised but I can't get a clear picture of what was discussed. TIA.

[shanklin] 14/10/2010 18:14

8T

I don't think we need you to provoke CR any more than may already be the case.

There was general consensus at today's conference call, taken on board by MUBL, that communication from the company to its shareholders has been weak and needs to be strengthened, with today's CC being the first move along this path.

Not that I think its been the only reason but the company did point out that since Woolworths and others went into administration, the company has been flat out seeking to meet demand trebling which has put a great (albeit profitable) burden on the company. I also suspect that the company does not wish to provide an excess of information to its competitors as to what it is up to, which has also left shareholders feeling under-informed

Nature abhors a vacuum, and the minimalist approach to communication has led directly to a number of concerns and allegations which have undoubtedly hurt the share price It is to be hoped that more regular communication will help matters going forward.

Even with the profits warning, MUBL appears cheap in terms of TBV, yield, P/E and EV/E, so it is to be hoped it will return to a more sensible valuation in due course.

[cockneyrebel] 14/10/2010 18:05

Another handle for Hatetrader lol

That's honest ay lol.

CR

[cockneyrebel] 14/10/2010 18:04

LoL - you tell me who I've slandered.

I'm asking questions - if some of you did this a bit earlier you might not be holding a stock that had just warned.

Seems you want to hear all the lovely stuff, the happy happy but ask the searching questions that you need to know as an investor and suddenly everyone wants to hide it.

Free speech and fair opinion hasn't been made illegal - I'd say some of the bullish comments on here are what want looking at.

CR

[shanklin] 14/10/2010 18:01

Reposted below.