Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[dr biotech] 06/1/2021 22:04

Seems the best they could do on proving the fraud was

1) a postal worker with disciplinary issues (that trump called a great patriot) the decided he didn’t actually hear what he claimed

2) a former stripper and convicted felon who even Guiliani tried to hush in court

3) the key witness in the laughable kraken, was a protrump podcaster who worked for the CIA for less than a year, about 20 years ago. No wonder it’s got nowhere. May be enough to convince the gullible or those that want to believe.

Twitter/YouTube not admissible in court.

Biggest winners tonight, China/Russia and other authoritarian regimes.

[k38] 06/1/2021 22:04

The Russians again...a Democrats vampire story to put kids to bed......lolI agree the man is not politician, he has no idea how to win the moment, don't know how to speak as politicians (lie) do.. but was good for ordinary Americans. His problem is...He doesn't know how and when to give up.

[diku] 06/1/2021 22:02

No support from Republicans?...they could see Trump theatrical played out...to keep the donations from his supporters flowing...





he had no support from Republicans so Democrats and supporters blackmailing the judges it was easy

[smurfy2001] 06/1/2021 22:01

This should be 40p already lagging behind as per usual !!

[daddy warbucks] 06/1/2021 21:53

Trump is doing the job the Russians would love to have done. Destroying democracy. Using the media to issue fake news, but claiming fake news when allegations are made against him. Inviting civil unrest with these unproved and unfounded claims of fraud. The man lacks any civil duty to his country or its citizens.

[k38] 06/1/2021 21:53

"....they just use the word Fraud on the outside but when it goes to Court they say it is not Fraud"What that tells you.... lolI don't know if he appointed the judges but what I said above stand.. after all he is the one who "lost" the election, he had no support from Republicans so Democrats and supporters blackmailing the judges it was easy.

[diku] 06/1/2021 21:48

Well Trump appointed the judges...Trump thought he could buy the judges being President... they just use the word Fraud on the outside but when it goes to Court they say it is not Fraud...

[k38] 06/1/2021 21:43

No proof.. how you can prove fraud if all judges are afraid to go against the system and do the right thing. Can you imagine what would happen if a judge had gone all the way..? either way.His career would be destroyed and risking life and death for himself and his family.

[diku] 06/1/2021 21:38

Fraud but no proof...well and truly planted in the minds of Trump supporters...but keep on donating money...

[k38] 06/1/2021 21:32

Fraud has been proved...people know, Democrats stole the election.

[xxxxxy] 06/1/2021 21:32

The governor of the Bank of England has said the UK should avoid becoming a financial services "rule taker" from the EU at all costs, even if it meals failing to strike a deal covering the sector.Andrew Bailey told MPs that following EU rules on financial services indefinitely would be too high a price to pay for access to the single market and free flow of trade for financial services."If the price of this is too high, we can't just go for it," the Bank of England governor said during a Wednesday afternoon appearance in front of the Treasury Select Committee."I would strongly recommend that we don't become a rule taker. I think that is a very bad place to end up in. If the price of that is no equivalence, then I'm afraid that will follow."The EU and UK struck an 11th-hour free trade agreement on Christmas Eve to avert a no deal Brexit when the transition period ended on 1 January. However, financial services were not covered by the agreement.The EU has granted the UK temporary waivers in two areas - clearing and securities settlement. Both sides have agreed to try and reach a separate, fuller agreement covering financial services by March. Bailey said he thought this was a realistic timescale for negotiations.UK negotiators are seeking to secure "equivalence" rights for Britain's financial services sector. This entails formal recognition from the EU that UK laws governing the sector are at the same standard as the EU's. It would mean finance firms could continue to sell services to the bloc uninhibited, although the EU would retain the right to withdraw equivalence rights at any point.READ MORE: UK and European Union strike historic Brexit trade dealThe EU has asked the UK to provide more information on its plans for future regulation of finance. Bailey said this was "quite problematic"."What's the motivation here? I can think of only one that is sensible," he said."The first motivation would be that the EU thinks the rules should never change - that's obviously mad."Secondly, they think that our rules should only change when their rules change. That would obviously be rule taking."The third one, which is the sensible one, is that both of us will change our rules when it's sensible to do so, we're both transparent about it, but obviously we'd be transparent at the time and we'll be transparent to everybody."Bailey pointed out that both the UK and EU were bound by international standards bodies governing finance, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. He said organisations like this form the basis of country-level regulation without any "regional overlay".READ MORE: Italy hands UK financial companies six-months post-Brexit operating extensionAgreeing equivalence would be preferable, Bailey said, but he qualified: "I don't start by saying we've got to get it, I don't start by saying it's the be all and end all."Sam Woods, deputy director of the Bank of England and head of the Prudential Regulation Authority, told MPs that regulators across the continent had already made progress aligning at a lower level. Woods said 30 "memorandum of understanding" had been signed with various EU organisations."There's already a lot of cooperative structure that's been bedded in, in a quiet way," he said.... Yahoo Finance

[k38] 06/1/2021 21:28

DikuNo.. I was against his actions after he found no support even from his own party so he had no chance with the judges. ...But even now, if he cooperate and pass power without anymore trouble he will keep his supporters.

[polar fox] 06/1/2021 21:26

Amidst all the chaos in Washington, the US media has called Democrat Ossoff the winner of the second Senate seat in Georgia. This means that Biden has taken control of the Senate.

[stonedyou] 06/1/2021 21:25

22 Highly renowned scientists: Out of all of the COVID patients we’ve identified with the PCR test, 97% never had COVID


It’s confirmed: The pandemic is driven by the faulty PCR tests, just like Pfizer’s ex-Chief Science Officer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, told us months ago.

(Article republished from HumansAreFree.com)

“Almost all” of the tests for Covid-19 are producing false positives, Dr. Yeadon warns.

Today we learn that 22 highly renowned scientists conclude that the PCR test produces 97% false positives. So out of all of the Covid patients we’ve ever seen, 97% never had Covid.


STOP PCR TESTING NOW!


It’s confirmed: The pandemic is a hoax. 22 highly renowned scientists conclude that the PCR test produces 97% false positives. So out of all of the Covid patients we’ve ever seen, 97% never had Covid. STOP PCR TESTING NOW. #covid #COVID19 #stoppcrtestingnow pic.twitter.com/m7ky8eIeDn

— Karl Watchtay7 (@kvwatchtay7) December 18, 2020



The study is available here and here.

Anthony Fauci has also recognised the problem with PCR testing, calling it a “fatal flaw.”

A European lawsuit has solidified the fact that the widely used PCR test for detecting the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is up to 97 percent unreliable – so basically useless.

[diku] 06/1/2021 21:23

You have only just found out about Trump gone too far...

[k38] 06/1/2021 21:20

Exposing lies and election fraud is one thing but I think Trump now has gone too far.. he is about to lose all credibility and support. For the Democrats (Pelosi and Hillary) this is a great opportunity to go all the way and destroy him as a politician and businessman. Trump should be building his son political career... too late now.

[portside1] 06/1/2021 21:17

He will have to shot him self

[xxxxxy] 06/1/2021 21:02

2. Helen , Wednesday, January 06, 2021, 08:34:Student exchange programmes weren't invented by the EU and are not exclusive to it. Just like so many things that they're trying to take credit for. Erasmus is just one scheme, clearly not brilliant for the UK. Even if it was, going forward we shouldn't rely on anything that is under the EU's control.

[stonedyou] 06/1/2021 20:23

Normally, two doctors are needed to certify a death, one of whom has been treating the patient or who knows them and has seen them recently. That has changed. For Covid-19 only, the certification can be made by a single doctor, and there is no requirement for them to have examined, or even met, the patient. A video-link consultation in the four weeks prior to death is now felt to be sufficient for death to be attributed to Covid-19. For deaths in care homes the situation is even more extraordinary. Care home providers, most of whom are not medically trained, may make a statement to the effect that a patient has died of Covid-19. In the words of the Office for National Statistics, this ‘may or may not correspond to a medical diagnosis or test result, or be reflected in the death certification’. From 29 March the numbers of ‘Covid deaths’ have included all cases where Covid-19 was simply mentioned on the death certificate — irrespective of positive testing and whether or not it may have been incidental to, or directly responsible for, death. From 29 April the numbers include the care home cases simply considered likely to be Covid-19.

So at a time when accurate death statistics are more important than ever, the rules have been changed in ways that make them less reliable than ever. In what proportion of Covid-19 ‘mentions̵7; was the disease actually present? And in how many cases, if actually present, was Covid-19 responsible for death? Despite what you may have understood from the daily briefings, the shocking truth is that we just don’t know. How many of the excess deaths during the epidemic are due to Covid-19, and how many are due to our societal responses of healthcare reorganisation, lockdown and social distancing? Again, we don’t know. Despite claims that they’re all due to Covid-19, there’s strong evidence that many, perhaps even a majority, are the result of our responses rather than the disease itself.

[portside1] 06/1/2021 20:20

Trump will have to face trail on coursing riots He as lost all respect now

[stonedyou] 06/1/2021 20:14

"In 92% of all deaths that mention COVID-19, COVID-19 is listed as the underlying cause of death," Lancashire said.

“It’s kind of ridiculous, because if they took the time to just read, they’d understand a little better what’s going on here,” Anderson also said.

A majority of Americans suffer from some form of chronic illness that would be counted as a comorbidity in a COVID-19 death, according to the CDC. Other conditions, such as heart failure and respiratory issues, can develop over the course of infection with the coronavirus.

“This is completely unsurprising, as it’s pretty rare that someone wouldn’t have at least one issue caused by coronavirus prior to their death, and all it means is that in 94% of cases people who had COVID-19 also developed other issues, or had other problems at the same time,” epidemiologist Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz wrote on Medium, explaining the CDC's comorbidity statistics and examining the response to them.