ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

54.36
0.14 (0.26%)
27 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.14 0.26% 54.36 54.26 54.28 54.46 54.04 54.14 43,633,953 16:35:13
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0901 6.02 32.86B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 54.22p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 41.00p to 63.46p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 60,609,645,770 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £32.86 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.02.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 435276 to 435289 of 439300 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  17416  17415  17414  17413  17412  17411  17410  17409  17408  17407  17406  17405  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
30/8/2024
18:27
"We shouldn't measure everything in terms of GDP figures or economics. There is something called quality of life."Nigel Farage
xxxxxy
30/8/2024
16:46
After 131 trading days, buyback complete to date:
Total shares to date........................2,462,860,466
Aggregate cost to date... ..................£1,313,220,790.17
Average price paid to date..................53.321p
Percentage of £2 billion buyback completed..65.66%

hardup1
30/8/2024
16:36
What about the Punjabi labour mp throwing ants and mould in for free at his rented flats in Redbridge! This must be the norm for the Punjab so he won't see it as a problem.
coolhandfluke
30/8/2024
15:57
#elonwasright
thevladslayer
30/8/2024
13:27
Telegraph reporting today that Fees for Eton are to go up to £63,000 per annum as a result of Labours VAT changes.
careful
30/8/2024
11:15
By the way that post the other day about the 6 tactical support units, aircraft etc looking for a bloke from leeds. Nobody knows what for- could have been smoking in a garden possibly. Anyway they found him yesterday - mt rescue mainly - dead in a farm outbuilding up the road. No more info but could be they shot him - as he was white and could have been puffing away in the barn - not recommended -NHS or no NHS. Poor bloke. All that trouble for Berkeley Red. One less for kk and the NHS to worry about though so alls well that ends well
scruff1
30/8/2024
11:14
Lloyds stokes mortgage battle with higher first-time buyer limit


Lloyds Banking Group PLC (LSE:LLOY) has further stoked the current battle for mortgage lending business by raising the maximum sums it will lend first-time buyers.

Owner of the Halifax and the UK's biggest mortgage provider, Lloyds will now lend up to 5.5 times annual household income to new buyers compared to 4.49 times previously.

Someone with an income of £50,000 can now borrow £275,000 against £224,500 previously or a 22% increase.

Lloyds said the move would mean an extra £2 billion becoming available for first-time buyers.

Brokers said the decision might prompt other lenders to follow suit, though some cautioned it might also raise affordability concerns.

Around 4.5 times income is the norm for first-time buyers but in housing boom times this has risen to as high as seven times income.

Conditions for the Lloyds and Halifax offer however are that the borrower’s annual household income must be at least £50,000 with a minimum deposit of at least at least 10% of the property's value..

freddie01
30/8/2024
10:54
Sounds like you need a cigar interest Ace. After 8 years I'd bet good money that you'd be able to limit your consumption to a couple a week no problem. I'm walking to Scarborough today and will spend at least a couple of hours wandering the streets in search of a traditional tobacconist. Can't think of a better way to waste my time & money....superb!
utrickytrees
30/8/2024
10:39
He's probably a gen z'er. They're all fascists.
utrickytrees
30/8/2024
09:51
donkeystone......I find it best to look at the TVR RNS issued on the last trading day of each month to get an accurate amount of shares still in issue at that point.

That's very helpful. Thank you.

freddie01
30/8/2024
09:24
Grow up. Your immature posts are beneath contempt
kkclimber56
30/8/2024
08:38
scruff......."The argument they used against it was that staff would be forced to work in a smoky environment as I remember."
No, they would not be forced, that argument is invalid. They would know when applying for the job that smoking was permitted in the establishment so they would know the risk. I think in the same way this would segregate members of the public, it would also segregate staff as well. It would attract staff who were smokers. Non smokers would not apply for jobs in establishments where smoking was permitted.

hardup1
30/8/2024
08:15
hardup
You are missing the point - its not about freedom of choice (imo) as I try to explain above. Your post is an argument well discussed at the time of the ban. The argument they used against it was that staff would be forced to work in a smoky environment as I remember. Keep the red herring flying high

scruff1
30/8/2024
08:09
Its FA to do with the NHS either- a red herring, an excuse for imposing their no smoking wish
scruff1
Chat Pages: Latest  17416  17415  17414  17413  17412  17411  17410  17409  17408  17407  17406  17405  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock