ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

53.94
0.22 (0.41%)
08 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.22 0.41% 53.94 53.84 53.88 54.38 53.58 53.84 369,326,320 16:35:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0859 6.27 34.25B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 53.72p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 39.55p to 54.38p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 63,569,225,662 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £34.25 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.27.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 294051 to 294069 of 426975 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  11763  11762  11761  11760  11759  11758  11757  11756  11755  11754  11753  11752  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
07/1/2020
14:04
Neil Woodford and his chief executive Craig Newman received £13.8 million of dividends in 12 months leading up to the crisis that engulfed Woodford Investment Management, accounts for the business show.

Those dividends, revealed in filings lodged with Companies House today, were paid to Woodford Capital, owned by Woodford and his business partner Craig Newman. The 65% to 35% ownership split between the fund manager and his chief executive entitles Woodford to £9 million of the payout and Newman to £4.8 million. The payouts were generated by profits after tax of £16.3 million over the year to the end of March.

That comes on top of at least £60 million of dividends and distributions paid out over the four years to 2018, with Woodford entitled to nearly £40 million of that.

grahamite2
07/1/2020
13:54
Minerve, answer the question, you coward. Or can't you stand behind your words?
psychochopper
07/1/2020
13:22
Not hate Roberto, just prejudice. xxx.
utrickytrees
07/1/2020
13:21
psychochopper 7 Jan '20 - 13:17 - 288806 of 288806 (Filtered)
minerve 2
07/1/2020
13:17
Minerve 27 Jan '20 - 12:25 - 288793 of 288804

Wishing bad things on people isn't as bad as actually placing bad things on people - like Brexit.

-------

So, to be clear, you wish cancer on all Brexit (leave) voters? Including those earning low wages, for example, in the North East?

Would you say this in a public forum, or are you just another coward hiding among the electrons? That's what I would define as low-life.

psychochopper
07/1/2020
12:53
KevinPosted January 7, 2020 at 6:50 am | Permalink"revisit old legislation that may be failing"If you have been elected on a platform to #GetBrexitDone, any and all legacy EU law that remains in our legal system should be made subject both to your power of amendment, and to exclusive interpretation by our courts. Decisions of the ECJ should not be applicable in the UK as a living source of law. Just as you would not ratify a treaty with the Vatican giving their court the authority to interpret Latin phrases in our legal system, so you should not ratify or endorse, for example:1) Art. 174(1) of the Withdrawal Agreement, or Clause 131 of the Political Declaration, both of which provide that, where a dispute (arising under the relevant agreement) raises a question of interpretation of provisions or concepts of EU law, the ECJ shall have jurisdiction to give a binding ruling; or,2) Art. 4(5) of the WA, which provides an (apparently one-sided) obligation that: "In the interpretation and application of this Agreement, the [UK's] judicial and administrative authorities shall have due regard to relevant case law of the [ECJ] handed down after the end of the transition period" (emphases added).
xxxxxy
07/1/2020
12:53
I agree it's the bigger risk/reward business verses the penny-ante mortgage market.
coolhandfluke
07/1/2020
12:52
@Freddie

You aren't anybody unless you regularly get several red downticks imo

:)

crossing_the_rubicon
07/1/2020
12:51
Utrickytrees , been in employment all my life , though that does not suit your hate filled agenda.
bargainbob
07/1/2020
12:44
Without leverage you can not make serious money. The flipside is the risk that is taken on board.
alphorn
07/1/2020
12:42
Fewer execs, lower expenses and far less spiviness in order yes.

:)

Wonder how much likes of Barclays, Deutsche, RBS lose on derivatives and other leveraged trading antics.

crossing_the_rubicon
07/1/2020
12:40
Hi CTRI appreciate the low margin and competitive business they are in but they always make a few billion before exceptionals. This time there should be less exes. Don't you think?
coolhandfluke
07/1/2020
12:38
Alphorn's the same. Upticks get up his nose as well. Always mentioning them.
freddie01
07/1/2020
12:37
robwt = 12 upticks.

Oh it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb does it!

As if Minerve cares about ADVFN upticks and downticks.

LOL

What a sad loser.

If it didn't bother you, you wouldn't have mentioned it.

freddie01
07/1/2020
12:35
robwt = 12 upticks.

Oh it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb does it!

As if Minerve cares about ADVFN upticks and downticks.

LOL

What a sad loser.

minerve 2
07/1/2020
12:29
@Cool,

With historical low interest rates banks are struggling to make money apparently.
Deposits 0-0.75% versus Mortgages 2.75-3.75%

If they cant make money borrowing at 0.5% odd and lending at 3.25% then they deserve to fail. They make even more on "loans" than mortgages I'd wager.

It's the spiviness that costs most of the banking sector.

crossing_the_rubicon
07/1/2020
12:29
Poikka

Notice it was a quote. Perhaps you would want be to put '(sic)' there? :)

minerve 2
07/1/2020
12:27
Come on guys, enough vitriol
poikka
07/1/2020
12:26
Ahem, "no-one" :) :)
poikka
Chat Pages: Latest  11763  11762  11761  11760  11759  11758  11757  11756  11755  11754  11753  11752  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock