Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Jupiter US Smaller Companies LSE:JUS London Ordinary Share GB0003463402 ORD 25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +1.25p +0.15% 853.50p 850.50p 853.50p 852.00p 840.00p 847.00p 49,581 16:35:15
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Equity Investment Instruments 1.3 -0.6 -3.9 - 181.54

Jupiter US Smaller Share Discussion Threads

Showing 89851 to 89860 of 90025 messages
Chat Pages: 3601  3600  3599  3598  3597  3596  3595  3594  3593  3592  3591  3590  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/8/2010
02:07
gicikbebe6 - 20 Aug'10 - 15:25 - 23673 of 23673 One of your friends Chris? Gordon Kidd is a convicted child molester as well as mark hardy. Do not give them any of your personal information. they will both stalk and harass your kidds. Kidd and hardy are also thieves who stolen the company cash and assets. Do not send them any money. You have been warned.
dudishes
20/8/2010
08:06
.........meant to add.....if what you say about the court hearings & inevitable outcome is true (which it isn't imho) then how comes the Judge(s) allowed any appeal(s)? Usually if any case brought before the court is clear cut then no Judge would grant any appeal. And if the outcome would have been the same as if a group of shareholders (and not Hardy) had tried to prosecute then how comes CJ felt he needed to employ an army of legal expertise to defend himself? And how comes he wasn't granted any costs or expenses or compo? Or was he? ........... from what little selective facts from a distance I could judge..... it seemed to me MUCH was being made of the fact that Hardy had no legal standing and was harassing/victimising/persecuting CJ whilst Hardy apparently was on a crusade against CJ to help create a smokescreen for Hardy's own alleged devious activities elsewhere. Now - surely - none of that would apply if a group of shareholders had/were to present the case? For & on behalf of Great Ormond Street Hospital For Sick Children.
tippyex
17/8/2010
07:58
MikePStevens - 13 Aug'10 - 12:58 - 23653 "ab...he 's just worried about being prosecuted" ++++++++++++ ++++++++++++ If the above aint a thinly veiled threat then I don't know what is. What could I ever be prosecuted over??????? Or be worried about????? Stating the truth perhaps? BTW - your nonsense about nicks. According to ADVFN's terms & conditions I wouldn't need any permission from Celtic Football Club or The Big Yin (or the zillions of others with the name of Billy Connolly) as long as I didn't claim to be someone I patently wasn't. ........whereas, someone was pretending to be me using my name (& my daughter's) on CJ's corrupt website as well as on Facebook. Sad beyond words, eh? And/or identity theft.
tippyex
17/8/2010
07:35
MikePStevens I don't care what's on CJ's corrupt website. I haven't got a clue what's been posted there for several years. But I have been told by several people that there have been several 100s of posts on there transparently making direct reference to me being this or that, being guilty of doing this or that, been involved in this and that, lied about this and that.........constantly making comments based on innuendo and pure fiction....... and YOU accuse ME of being guilty of victimisation?????? CONTRAST THAT - my posts on here, are mainly asking CJ straightforward shareholder related questions (that never get answered) and my highlighting his shortcomings and inconsistancies and anomalies......all based on known facts and evidence. I have never hidden behind any nick. You and Ali Onder (who is always welcome in your home) CJ and his wee gang have always known who I am. CJ has even put many of my posts on here in the courtroom as evidence.....ffs!!!!!! .....and, what you posted above is done with your usual memory lapse, I even gave you my real name & identity in email exchanges with you back in 2003. Unlike you. In hiding even then. And ever since.
tippyex
16/8/2010
17:58
....as for your real name being used as a pseudonym on cj' s website you said on here yonks ago you didnt care about what was on there....now youre whinging...typical...if youve changed ya mind all you gotta do is write to cj or the site webmaster & ask for it to be removed...mind you, you used billy connolleys real name..was that with his permission then?...lol
mikepstevens
16/8/2010
11:56
ABarclayman/MikePStevens So long as you cowardly hide behind the cover & anonimity of your nick(s) on here it is simply not possible for me - as you claim - to make any defamatory remarks about you. None that are meaningful at any rate. The reason for which should be pretty obvious. I refuse to be intimidated by CJ claiming to hold me to account "for & on behalf of shareholders" or by thinly veiled threats on here by you of me being prosecuted - nor by malicious and criminally libellous nonsense sent to my ex-neighbours and elsewhere - nor by the constant juvenile comments on here branding me a liar and/or being accused of being "up to my neck" and such likes in entirely fictitious activity whilst being "in hiding". And not to forget my being branded a convicted child molester and my real name being used as a pseudonym on CJ's corrupt website and also on Facebook to pretend I'm in contact with Hardy's wife.
tippyex
15/8/2010
12:01
MikePStevens The website still doesn't have a front page (www.just-think-action.co.uk) so effectively the website is down although you can navigate directly to the forum if you happen to know the URL. The problem is that the index.php is missing or is inaccessible. This is largely a generic file for this type of website. Not sure why it would be missing, perhaps it's there but has the wrong access levels. You may wish to pass this on to whoever controls the site (if you are in touch with him/her). ca UPDATE: I see someone has taken note of my post and the site is now fully back up.
classaction
13/8/2010
10:16
Tippyex You need to stop the endless mischievous speculation about me old boy, just because i question you, your opinions and your relationship with Mr Hardy, past or present. Also i've not posted any defamatory comments, unlike you, so jettyboy's post isn't relevant to me. But obviously is to you, which is why you have to comment! You're much too easy to see through old boy. AB
abarclayman
13/8/2010
07:55
jettyboy - as MikePStevens/ABarclayman (surely one & the same?) might say it's a bit of a red herring. Certainly in some circumstances. As ADVFN and the Police will tell you - it is possible to use fabricated IP addresses which makes tracing a bit of a mare. Mind you - if you don't have that skill set......then yes, it is as you say "interesting".
tippyex
12/8/2010
21:36
posted on the Corac (cra) BB interesting! rat attack - 9 Aug'10 - 08:57 - 10397 of 10535 Interesting and about time (no doubt more will follow): Nighthawk Energy plc ("Nighthawk" or "the Company") Bulletin Board Legal Action The board of directors of Nighthawk, the US focused hydrocarbon production and development company, is pleased to advise of action that has been taken and is continuing in response to persistent defamatory and untrue postings on the Interactive Investor Trading Limited ("iii") and ADVFN plc ("ADVFN") bulletin boards. The postings concern the operations of Nighthawk and its management which the board considers to be extremely damaging to the Company and its reputation. The Company took steps to identify the posters who try to escape liability for their defamatory postings by hiding behind a cloak of anonymity, using anonymous email, social networking or bulletin board accounts to disseminate those postings. In some cases the names and other details used to register these accounts are fictitious and posters also can try and cover their tracks using numerous pseudonyms but they can be traced through their IP addresses. The operators of the bulletin board services can be prevented by confidentiality and data protection laws from disclosing the names and other personal information associated with the accounts. However, the English Courts can exercise their discretion and order such disclosure, provided certain criteria are met. In the High Court of Justice on 28 June 2010 Nighthawk obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order instructing iii and ADVFN to provide information in respect of various posters, who were posting material that the Court accepted could be defamatory. Both iii and ADVFN are assisting the Company with providing the relevant information including details of the posters. The identities of various individuals behind these postings have now been established and the Company and its directors are now considering with their legal advisers instituting civil proceedings against them for defamation. Further announcements will be made as appropriate!
jettyboy
Chat Pages: 3601  3600  3599  3598  3597  3596  3595  3594  3593  3592  3591  3590  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:42 V: D:20171217 03:57:00