Iofina Share Discussion Threads

[timbo237] 10/12/2013 08:42

Me too - I think we will be handsomely rewarded in time - just have to be patient.

[orslega] 10/12/2013 08:38

Well, I have been adding..... January sales come early!lol

[the librarian] 10/12/2013 08:13

Is that what it is? :)

[1madmarky] 10/12/2013 08:06

Lib, people are taking the Christmas money off the table. So they can buy things for people they don't even like :-D

[n3tleylucas] 10/12/2013 06:47

So the gap gets filled @149. Still think 133's well on here. Lot of nervy west country spa town types on here, tend to sell in a panic. Good for share trading though, need the fear.

[mail2] 10/12/2013 02:06

152 was were iof gapped higher.

[escapetohome] 09/12/2013 22:37

Oh I remember!

Well and truly discredited then - Oops!

[johncsimpson] 09/12/2013 22:01

Yes, coco was 'outed'. Had a split personality . . . caught out by a screenshot a bit like jonnybig. Could still be posting though.

[diggulden] 09/12/2013 21:55

Did you mean Coco, or EWCT?

Or.....

[escapetohome] 09/12/2013 19:57

I think it was Cocorico was saying a month or so ago - a gap to be filled at 1.50 in order for a stronger platform going forward - looks to be spot on.

My yearning for £1.80 satisfaction and £2.00 bliss by Christmas doesnt seem wildy out of quilter.

[woodpeckers] 09/12/2013 18:41

I was referring to the 'games' of people who I'm guessing are now short.

As I see it, the reason we have a lull in the share price is purely because we await news that the company will continue to roll out plants, which many of us here are pretty confident they will. There may well be shares that are moving faster at the moment, but I'm not a trader (always sell just before they take off and vice versa!)

Delays are normal in business and do not worry me in the scale of things. In a few months time this will be a much more relaxed board IMO due to a market that won't be able to get enough of us!

[johncsimpson] 09/12/2013 18:19

Absolutely right BAGUETTE your post 12098 - my apologies and on reflection it was sarcasm so my apologies there too. Have ticked you up though I was not being patronising in so doing.

[john10] 09/12/2013 17:52

" . . . I feel a sort of duty to caution them . O.K."

It really does amaze me that we have people who think that PIs are so stupid that they can't see through these games!

[woodpeckers] 09/12/2013 17:49

Baguette, really kind of you to be worried about us mere mortals, but.....

It really does amaze me that we have people who think that PIs are so stupid that they can't see through these games!

[baguette] 09/12/2013 17:40

JCS Thanks for telling me I "really should be very careful re my comments". How patronising, specially bearing in mind some of the shocking ramping that is endlessly regurgitated on this thread.

People maybe should remember that endless amounts of analysis of everything mean not a jot in terms of whether management deliver on the opportunities.

Look I am a big boy, more than capable of looking after myself and hanging on in there for the time being, but if any others are hanging on all the words dished out then I feel a sort of duty to caution them . O.K.

[rhwillcol] 09/12/2013 17:37

Baguette: just one comment from part of your post 12095 above:

".... from a bevy of people who think they "own" the company on this thread"

That is because many (or most) of us actually DO own the company talked about on this thread. It's called "being a shareholder".

[superg1] 09/12/2013 17:35

AOTN

I have a screen full of filtered, my guess is you mean SE. He is far too busy at Hawk and other business matters he is trying to pursue.

Some try and guess the whys etc?

What the IOF guys find is that is easier to ask him, so the answer is as above.

His other exploits have taken over. Hawk don't have the depth of the team IOF have.

[baguette] 09/12/2013 17:13

Oh you don't think the thing about slashing wrists is sarcasm - very strange !!. The message is absolutely clear anyone who makes any reasonable comment about the need to take a little heed of the current situation is always rewarded with sarcasm and lectures advising one to think straight, from a bevy of people who think they "own" the company on this thread.

My comment remains on here for anyone who wishes to take any notice (there may be none) and no sarcasm will remove it.

[johncsimpson] 09/12/2013 17:12

BAGUETTE

I wouldn't call it sarcasm either - I know I'm not your favourite poster but you really have to be very careful re your comment below:

. . . I do not think, with a succession of disappointing RNS's and a declining share price, that now is the time to encourage others to invest any further in IOF until some positively good news is actually to hand rather than nudge nudge wink winked

You may well be right, I sincerely hope you're not, being right or wrong has never been the issue re what you post but you have to allow people to make up their own minds. The other side of the coin (the positives that's been around for quite some time) would make you look rather foolish should IOF announce major news - say this week or next.

But if you are right, of course, then I might look foolish . . .

[peterz] 09/12/2013 16:55

Bag, it seems just a comment rather than sarcasm to me.

[baguette] 09/12/2013 16:44

Usual sarcasm in response

[angel of the north] 09/12/2013 16:40

So....should I slash my wrists then?
Non-Execs get paid....its a salary for work they do, they may not have any loyalty to the company other than their wage packet and perks. Perhaps he had too many fingers in too many pies and IOF weren't happy with what he delivered, or they were expecting more for their money?