Inland Homes Share Discussion Threads

[rikaughty] 22/9/2016 22:06

Ha ha ha. Read the comments on the above article. Class.

[sleepy] 05/9/2016 14:09

I thought the high was 88p

[duncan doughnut] 05/9/2016 13:26

It was nice to get back to the pre referendum high last week. As a long term holder I'm still confident these will hit new highs before the year is out. All the data suggests the recent trading environment has bounced back.

[igbertsponk] 31/8/2016 09:12

well the programme was probably right - a site in Beaconsfield with outline permission for 300 new houses should have gone for trillions. But I guess the likes of Berkeley Homes decided it wasn't for them.

[david77] 31/8/2016 08:55

There was a TV programme recently where a presenter was complaining that the MoD sold sites for less than they could have got. Wilton Park was one of the named sites.

[igbertsponk] 31/8/2016 08:33

Loan for Wilton Park appears to be for more than they paid for the whole site. A canny purchase indeed!

[shanklin] 31/8/2016 07:14

Interesting RNS today in terms of INL's debt arrangements with a...

"new £27m facility with Secure Trust Bank Plc, secured on 86 Former MoD houses at its Wilton Park, Beaconsfield development. This facility is for a five year term and will be used in part to refinance an existing £18.9 million facility at a significantly lower interest rate."

I wonder to what extent this addresses the issues raised in the RNS of 09-Jun-16, entitled "Re-financing arrangements" when they stated...

"Inland has historically funded the acquisition of its land purchases (including the prime 114 acre Wilton Park project in Beaconsfield) though a number of sources and at a range of interest rates. In view of the expansion of the Group and its growing stature in the sector, it is now considering a range of debt options and sources (including the retail bond market) for refinancing these liabilities at lower interest rates and / or improved terms and conditions."

It sounds as though they may continue to have piecemeal arrangements albeit that they can obtain them on better terms and pay down some of their more onerous loans.

At least this loan looks like a good move forward.

[source] 22/8/2016 13:05

I wish I was that clever too IgertSponk! :)

Regards,
Source.

[igbertsponk] 22/8/2016 12:04

Getting glad I didn't sell (though would have been clever to sell then buy back).

[mfhmfh] 19/8/2016 10:34

tipped in IC yesterday

[igbertsponk] 19/8/2016 10:04

Clickable.

[tom.muir] 19/8/2016 09:57

hxxp://www.ftsenews.co.uk/2016/08/18/inland-homes-loninl-new-price-targets-6/

[spud] 28/7/2016 11:22

And taken an additional 5k.

spud

[yupawiese2010] 27/7/2016 18:08

Further to my above post, we sold the majority of this site way back in November last year, so not sure what the implications are for Inland.

[yupawiese2010] 27/7/2016 17:46

Delays at Leighton Buzzard site due to collapse of Vantage.

[spud] 26/7/2016 10:29

Bought back in with 10k. Fall looks overdone imo.

spud

[shanklin] 25/7/2016 10:44

Good job INL didn't post a negative update!

[cerrito] 22/7/2016 11:22

Given that yupawiese2010 and Shanklin had told us about Venture I thought today's update pretty positive but we will need to wait to the December AGM to get a clearer picture of the Brexit impact

[qs99] 22/7/2016 10:07

about to turn blue me thinks...

[igbertsponk] 22/7/2016 09:13

The chart showing the share price is the clue to why the Director sold - into strength.

[joe say] 22/7/2016 08:22

That's a very good point Wan

Nov - share sale
Dec - AGM statement - no mention of issues
Feb - Appointment of an MD to oversee the company's construction activities

Clearly a Feb appointment (an external recruit) would not have happened overnight - so the timelines certainly give cause for suspicion

[wan] 22/7/2016 08:06

I sold out a while ago, but still keep a (tentative) eye on things here. Has anyone else wondered how (if at all) Wick's share sale in November 2015, fits with the timeline regarding the contractor issues?

[standish11] 22/7/2016 08:05

Darlocst. Smarm is certainly not smug. Anyone who has followed her posts over several years on various threads will appreciate her constructive input and her acknowledgement of trading losses.