ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

IMB Imperial Brands Plc

1,826.00
-17.50 (-0.95%)
03 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Imperial Brands Plc LSE:IMB London Ordinary Share GB0004544929 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -17.50 -0.95% 1,826.00 1,826.50 1,827.50 1,855.50 1,826.00 1,846.50 1,548,159 16:35:28
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Cigarettes 32.48B 2.33B 2.6392 6.92 16.12B
Imperial Brands Plc is listed in the Cigarettes sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IMB. The last closing price for Imperial Brands was 1,843.50p. Over the last year, Imperial Brands shares have traded in a share price range of 1,553.50p to 1,964.50p.

Imperial Brands currently has 882,089,213 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Imperial Brands is £16.12 billion. Imperial Brands has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.92.

Imperial Brands Share Discussion Threads

Showing 6651 to 6668 of 8675 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  275  274  273  272  271  270  269  268  267  266  265  264  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/7/2021
08:40
I am beginning to think that trying to immitate a steam train as a woke alternative to cigarettes has had its day. Heated tobacco may prove a better way forward with a lot less display.
irenekent
16/7/2021
15:57
Holding nicely over the past month and yielding the highest dividend in the FTSE100 @ 8.74%.

I'm also expecting a 5% increase for next year.

spud

spud
13/7/2021
11:33
Imperial Brands' nicotine firm Nerudia set for major restructure with almost 80 Liverpool jobs at risk
It will impact staff at the firm's Liverpool R&D facility



Almost 80 North West jobs are at risk after Nerudia, a nicotine products manufacturer owned by a FTSE 100-listed firm, announced a major restructure.

A spokesman from Nerudia and Imperial Brands today confirmed a proposed restructuring of the business, which develops products to encourage smokers to switch to less harmful alternatives.

The move could mean the loss of 77 roles across the firm's R&D production facility in Speke, Liverpool.

The firm told BusinessLive the proposal came after "significant consideration", and will include redeploying staff internally and re-training them "wherever possible".

It added that job losses are "always regrettable" - and that it will ensure staff are treated "in a fair and responsible manner".

A statement from Imperial Brands said: “We have today announced a proposed restructuring of our Nerudia business which could potentially result in the loss of 77 roles across our R&D and production facility in Liverpool.

“The proposal was put forward after significant consideration and supports our ongoing work to transform Imperial by simplifying our operations and implementing new ways of working to place the consumer at the centre of our business."

A total of 160 people are based at the Merseyside site - meaning almost half of them will be affected by today's announcement.

When the £11m site opened back in 2014, Nerudia said it would become Europe's biggest nicotine manufacturing site.

Nerudia develops various products including vapour, heated tobacco and oral nicotine delivery. Manufacturing at the Speke site includes producing e-liquid for vaping. In 2017, it became part of Imperial Brands - a Bristol-based, FTSE 100-listed firm with over 30,000 employees worldwide. Imperial is the world's fourth-largest international cigarette company.

The statement continued: “As part of the consultation process we will be discussing a range of employee support measures which will include, wherever possible, internal redeployment and re-training.

“The prospect of job losses is always regrettable and we are committed to ensuring that our people are treated in a fair and responsible manner.”

spud

spud
01/7/2021
17:51
Spring Mountain starting to splash their cash here now. Added 0.8% of the company recently.
gary1966
01/7/2021
10:40
Yes, mine in too now :-)
philanderer
01/7/2021
08:09
Thanks for answers - also transferred from EQi, hence the query. Divi credited this morning
2bracken
30/6/2021
20:45
I've just been transferred from EQI to ii and am also waiting for ii to credit dividend.
rik shaw
30/6/2021
18:53
Dividend paid into HL account.
minerve 2
30/6/2021
18:47
2bracken , no dividend paid into my ii account. They were a day late with my MRW dividend this week as well. EQI who I was with before being taken over by ii always paid on the day.
philanderer
30/6/2021
18:46
A CEO is rated by business performance rather than share price performance making all that previous post complete and utter meaningless tripe.
medieval blacksmith
30/6/2021
18:43
What a difference a year makes…or perhaps not!

Those of you who are clued up on IMB will know Stefan Bomhard has now completed one year service at IMB having been appointed to the Board as CEO on 1 July 2020. So here we are one year on and the fact of the matter is neither Bomhard’s arrival or turnaround plan have had any meaningful impact on the share price whatsoever. I’ll let the stats do the talking.

On 30 June 2020 IMB closed at 1539p. Exactly one year later the closing price is 1557p which means in the past 12 months the share price has gained just 18p (+1.15%). YTD 2021: +6.5p (+0.42%). On the plus side the YTD performance (so far) is a marked improvement on recent years noting between 2016 & 2020 the share price declined on average by 15% each year. In fact the last time IMB had a positive year was 2015 when it gained 21% (y/e c.3600p). Since then it’s been all downhill. 2016 (-1%), 2017 (-11%), 2018 (-25%), 2019 (-21%), 2020 (-18%).

Given the negligible increase of past 12 months I would best describe IMB’s share price movement as going sideways rather than being progressive, not really breaking any ground, certainly not showing any real signs of a recovery at this moment in time. For me, the first tangible sign of a recovery starts with a sustained move above 1700p, but in terms of real recovery that would be a breakout of 2000p.

Hopefully we’ll start seeing some upward momentum in the second year of Bomhard’s reign. In the meantime Mr Market is still being ruthlessly stubborn, still not prepared to re-rate the stock.

wunderbar
30/6/2021
18:39
Spud showing his true colours as the closet Little Englander. :)
medieval blacksmith
30/6/2021
17:57
Yep. Got mine early doors. spud
spud
30/6/2021
17:39
Can anyone with ii confirm if divi has been paid into account today? Thanks
2bracken
30/6/2021
15:25
Well they pretty much rule The United States Of Europe under Merkel...

spud

spud
29/6/2021
17:54
Dividend payment day tomorrow 👍
time 2 retire
18/6/2021
00:36
Another bizarre buyback example , is that of the multibillion investment company , responsible for investing everyone else's money....

I know , this sounds made up...

So their day job is investing everyone else's cash to make a return.
But when faced with surplus cash of their own... they bought back their own stock.

But you say , that shores up EPS and so makes even lower profits , spread over less shares to give a greater EPS and higher dividends ?

What could go wrong ?

Aside from the fact that it invited the world to conclude that if the company could not invest its own money why should it be trusted to invest anyone else's ?
Redemptions increased and FUM/AUM declined.

But it gets better.

After frittering £Bln's on its own stock SLA soon to be renamed "Abrdn" (no I am not making that up) ....
.... CUT it's dividend by about 33%

Yes you guessed it the share price has lost about 41% since the buyback started.

So what % of buybacks fail ?

fenners66
18/6/2021
00:23
I believe Warren Buffet was cited as some evidence of the infallibility of buybacks earlier.

There is a lot of inconsistency in Buffets approach to buybacks - yes Berkshire Hathaway does them , BUT Buffet avoided investing BH's cash in companies that did them.

Eventually he bit the bullet and bought US airline companies stocks a few years ago whilst they did about $50bn of share buybacks.

He ditched those stocks last year and LOST if memory serves correct about $11bn and I believe decided to go back to plan A and forget about investing in companies doing buybacks.

Those US airlines then went back to the markets cap in hand asking shareholders to stump up ... yes you guessed it ..... $50bn so they could survive.....

I did the research on that last year so may have got some details slightly wrong - but essentially that is the real story.

So the question remains - what % of buybacks are Fails ?

If you want to go all statistical and skew the figures by the value rather than the volume of buybacks , I am certain that the US airline industry example is a rather large % on its own

fenners66
Chat Pages: Latest  275  274  273  272  271  270  269  268  267  266  265  264  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock