Any idea on today’s big tick up. Generic China bounce or company specific |
So far so good. |
bottom,big shareholders are reducing their short positions and buying more stock |
Is this the bottom, or will there be another leg down? |
thanks Gents, or ladies...... |
Lomcovaks. Let's hope so. |
TDay, Could be relief rally as Chinese regulators signal easing up of pressure on the tech sector - many of which have ADRs listed in US. This from Zerohedge on Monday - |
Something is up. |
and IPO'd at $12.50 6 years ago..........unbelievable |
Yep. Started this year at US35 - now US9. |
Yep. Started this year at US35 - now US9. |
more free shares for insiders..... |
Buy now with a 10% stop might be a profitable trade a little further down the line... |
hey cazaman General Atlantic
They now have someone on the BOD as of 16th May, clearly tehy want to have a say in how the company is being run |
who is GA please? I am the bottom fisher |
correction, GA have now LOST 75% of their Clients money.......... |
when this gets below $1 it will de-list so no HFCAA needed |
"Hopefully a more active corporate strategy and better attitude towards investor relations.
Agree 100% 1jat and I think that is exactly why he's there, at the insistence of GA, who have lost 70% of their money.
Hutchmed is treated by CKHH as a subsidiary and acts accordingly. This needs to change otherwise no new institutional investors will touch it with a barge pole. |
Meanwhile, Hutchmed has appointed a new NED from General Atlantic. This is an interesting development, will the capital group and Barings also want a representative…;.and what will this consultant / spy in the camp deliver?
Hopefully a more active corporate strategy and better attitude towards investor relations. |
Sadly,militarism is far from logical and is driven by primitive instinct.The Western response to the invasion of Ukraine probably makes it less likely,i suspect,that China would invade Taiwan.However,if the world becomes increasingly embroiled in conflict,who knows what might opportunistically occur. |
they've had decades to do it, why would they do it now when they need the west so badly, they could have done it decades ago when they were far less reliant on the west and sanctions wouldn't have hurt them so much.
"The west now need to wake up and be making rapid plans to decouple instead of pretending this is not going to happen soon and stop sticking its head in the sand like you are doing!"
I'm not, I agree with you, the west do need to wake up, I just don't think China will invade Taiwan. |
Why would they have done it by now, don't get that comment what's your logic, makes no sense!
China have accelerated their de-coupling from the west. Contrary to your second point, its actually the west that needs China as this is how we've managed to export our inflation and many other problems including our carbon footprint and above all, improve our standard of living through cheap labour and goods and increase our average life spans.
The west now need to wake up and be making rapid plans to decouple instead of pretending this is not going to happen soon and stop sticking its head in the sand like you are doing! |
If China wanted to invade Taiwan I would have thought it would have done it by now. China needs the west which is its biggest customer. They will not invade Taiwan. |